Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:23:09.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A COMMENTARY ON TERMINOLOGY CHOICE IN GENERATIVE ACQUISITION RESEARCH

THE CASE OF “INCOMPLETE GRAMMARS” IN HERITAGE LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, BY LAURA DOMÍNGUEZ, GLYN HICKS, AND ROUMYANA SLABAKOVA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2019

Ricardo Otheguy*
Affiliation:
City University of New York
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ricardo Otheguy, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonfiglio, T. P. 2010. Mother tongues and nations: The invention of the native speaker. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L., Hicks, G., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Terminology choice in generative acquisition research: The case of “incomplete acquisition” in heritage language grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, 241–255. doi: 10.1017/S0272263119000160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R. 2016. The linguistic competence of second-generation bilinguals: A critique of “incomplete acquisition.” In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I. L., & O’Neill, T. (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013, [RLLT 9] (pp. 301320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar