Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:05:53.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION OF UNSTRESSED ENGLISH VOWELS BY EARLY AND LATE KOREAN AND JAPANESE BILINGUALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

Borim Lee ,
Susan G. Guion  and
Tetsuo Harada
Borim Lee
Affiliation:
Wonkwang University
Susan G. Guion
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Tetsuo Harada
Affiliation:
Waseda University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The production of unstressed vowels in English by early and late Korean- and Japanese-English bilinguals was investigated. All groups were nativelike in having a lower fundamental frequency for unstressed as opposed to stressed vowels. Both Korean groups made less of an intensity difference between unstressed and stressed vowels than the native speakers (NSs) of English as well as less of a difference in duration between the two types of vowel than the NSs. The Japanese speakers, whose native language has a phonemic length distinction, produced more nativelike durational patterns. Finally, the vowel quality (first and second formant frequencies) of unstressed vowels was different from the NS group's for the late bilinguals, for whom unstressed vowels were widely dispersed in the vowel space according to their orthographic representations, and from the early Korean bilinguals, who substituted the Korean high central vowel. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of the phonological status of first language phonetic features and age of acquisition.This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation (KRF-2003-042-A00048) and partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (DC05132). A draft of this research was presented at the English phonology workshop division held for the 50th anniversary of the English Language and Literature Association of Korea (June 2004). The authors would like to thank four anonymous SSLA reviewers and Jonathan Loftin for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 487 - 513
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C. (1979). English speech rhythm and the foreign learner. The Hague: Mouton.
Anderson, P.J. (1993). The interstress interval as an indicator of perceived intelligibility among nonnative speakers of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wichita State University, Kansas.
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301–339.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1993). The learnability of English metrical parameters by adult Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 31/32, 129–142.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1997). The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics, 35, 167–181.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. & Cupples, L. (2004). Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and nonnative speakers of English: Evidence from onset gating. Memory and Cognition, 32, 21–30.Google Scholar
Beckman, M.E. (1982). Segment duration and the ‘mora’ in Japanese. Phonetica, 39, 113–135.Google Scholar
Beckman, M.E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.
Beckman, M.E. & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory timing and the prosodic interpretation of syllable duration. Phonetica, 45, 156–174.Google Scholar
Beckman, M.E. & Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309.Google Scholar
Best, C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Best, C.T., McRoberts, G.W., & Sithole, N.M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 345–360.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116–137.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language learning and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Browman, C.P. & Goldstein, L. (1992). Targetless schwa: An articulatory analysis. In G. J. Docherty & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 26–36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Y.G. (2000). The age effect in second language acquisition: Is it too late to acquire native-level competence in a second language after the age of seven? In Y. Oshima-Takane, Y. Shirai, & H. Sirai (Eds.), Studies in language sciences 1 (pp. 159–169). Tokyo: Japanese Society of Language Sciences.
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dauer, R.M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar
Davis, S.M. & Kelly, M.H. (1997). Knowledge of the English noun-verb stress difference by native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 445–460.Google Scholar
Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation teaching. Language Learning, 48, 393–410.Google Scholar
Derwing, T.M. & Rossiter, M.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–17.Google Scholar
Erdmann, P.H. (1973). Patterns of stress-transfer in English and German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 229–241.Google Scholar
Fear, B.D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1893–1904.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J.E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flege, J.E. & Bohn, O.-S. (1989). An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 35–62.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., Frieda, E.M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E. & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.Google Scholar
Fokes, J., Bond, Z.S., & Steinberg, M. (1984). Patterns of English word stress by native and non-native speakers. In M. P. R. van den Broecke & A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 682–686). Dordrecht: Foris.
Francis, A.L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H.C. (2000). Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1668–1680.Google Scholar
Francis, A.L. & Nusbaum, H.C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 349–366.Google Scholar
Fry, D.B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 765–768.Google Scholar
Fry, D.B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–152. (Reprinted in Acoustic phonetics: A course of basic readings, by D. B. Fry, Ed., 1976, New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gay, T. (1978). Physiological and acoustic correlates of perceived stress. Language and Speech, 21, 347–353.Google Scholar
Glen, R. (2003). Japanese lexically specified accent: A word-level prominence system with both pitch and loudness as components. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Gottfried, T.L. & Suiter, T.L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin tones. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 207–231.Google Scholar
Guenther, F.H., Husain, F.T., Cohen, M.A., & Shinn-Cunningham, B.G. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900–2912.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica, 60, 98–128.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503–533.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G., Flege, J.E., Liu, S.H., & Yeni-Komshian, G.H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205–228.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G., Flege, J.E., & Loftin, J.D. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27–42.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G., Harada, T., & Clark, J.J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals' acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226.Google Scholar
Guion, S.G. & Pederson, E., (in press) Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production: A festschrift in honour of James E. Flege. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hammill, D.D., Brown, V.L., Larsen, S.C., & Weiderholt, J.L. (1994). Test of adolescent and adult language ( 3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Hammond, R.H. (1986). Error analysis and the natural approach to teaching foreign languages. Lenguas Modernas, 13, 129–139.Google Scholar
Harada, T. (2004, May). Age of acquisition effects on English stress in Japanese-English bilinguals. >Paper resented at the 2004 American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Portland, OR.
Homma, Y. (1971). Visicorder de mita Kyoto hogen no akusento [Pitch accent in Kyoto speech through a visicorder]. Bulletin of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 137, 11–15, 6.Google Scholar
Homma, Y. (1985). Nichi eigo no onkyoo onseegaku [Acoustic phonetics in English and Japanese]. Tokyo: Yamaguchi Shoten.
Householder, F.W. (1971). Linguistic speculations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huss, V. (1978). English word stress in the post-nuclear position. Phonetica, 35, 86–105.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell.
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P.K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., et al. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.S. & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects on second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Kim, H.-S. & Han, J.-I. (1998). Vowel length in modern Korean: An acoustic analysis. In B.-S. Park & J. H. Yoon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Korean Linguistics (pp. 412–418). Seoul: Hanshin.
Kondo, Y. (2000). Production of schwa by Japanese speakers of English: An acoustic study of shifts in coarticulatory strategies from L1 to L2. In M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp. 29–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koo, H.-S. (1997). Umhyang chukjungkwa jikak pandane uihan hankukin yeongeoui unyul yeongu [A study using acoustic measurements and perceptual judgment to identify prosodic characteristics of English as spoken by Koreans]. Speech Sciences, 2, 95–108.Google Scholar
Koopmans-van Beinum, F.J. (1980). Vowel contrast reduction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Academische Pers B.V.
Kuhl, P.A. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.A. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11,850–11,857.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1996). Elements of acoustic phonetics ( 2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, H.-B. (1989). Korean grammar. London: Oxford University.
Lee, H.-Y. (1996). Kukeo umsunghak [Korean phonetics]. Seoul: Taehaksa.
Lee, H.-Y. (1997). Kukeo unyullon [Korean prosody]. Seoul: Hankukyeonguwon.
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1173–1181.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J. J. Ohala & J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 13–44). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Long, M.H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.Google Scholar
Mairs, J.L. (1989). Stress assignment in interlanguage phonology: An analysis of the stress system of Spanish speakers learning English. In S. M. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 260–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McAllister, R., Flege, J.E., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.Google Scholar
Mochizuki-Sudo, M. & Kiritani, S. (1991). Production and perception of stress-related durational patterns in Japanese learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 231–248.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Munro, M.J. & Derwing, T.M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310.Google Scholar
Neustupny, J.V. (1966). Nihongo no akusento wa kootee akusento ka? [Is the Japanese accent a pitch accent?]. Bulletin of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 121, 1–7.Google Scholar
Nosofsky, R.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1979). The concept of the sensitive period in developmental studies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 25, 83–103.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–472.Google Scholar
Pennington, M. & Richards, J. (1986). Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 207–225.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Pike, K.L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Piske, T., MacKay, I.R.A., & Flege, J.E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Port, R.F., Dalby, J., & O'Dell, M. (1987). Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1574–1585.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–292.Google Scholar
Rietveld, A.C.M. & Koopmans-van Beinum, F.J. (1987). Vowel reduction and stress. Speech Communication, 6, 217–229.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sluijter, A.M.C. & van Heuven, V.J. (1996a). Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. Proceedings of ICSLP 96 (pp. 630–633). Philadelphia: Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories, Alfred I. DuPont Institute.
Sluijter, A.M.C. & van Heuven, V.J. (1996b). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A.M.C., van Heuven, V.J., & Pacilly, J.J.A. (1997). Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 503–513.Google Scholar
Sugito, M. (1969). Dootai sokutee niyoru nihongo akusento no kaimei [The solution of Japanese accent through dynamic measurements]. Gengo Kenkyuu [Studies on Language], 55, 14–39.Google Scholar
Sugito, M. (1980). Akusento, intoneshon no hikaku [Comparison of accent and intonation]. In T. Kunihiro (Ed.), Nichieigo hikaku koza: Onsei to keitai [Series of Japanese and English contrastive linguistics: Phonology and morphology] (pp. 107–183). Tokyo: Taishukan.
Tomlin, R.S. & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Bergem, D.R. (1994). A model of coarticulatory effects on the schwa. Speech Communication, 14, 143–162.Google Scholar
van der Mark, S. (2002). The acoustic correlates of Blackfoot prominence. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 24, 169–216.Google Scholar
Vance, T.J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vanderslice, R. & Ladefoged, P. (1972). Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word accentuation rules. Language, 48, 819–838.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F. (1989). Becoming a native listener. American Scientist, 77, 54–59.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Pegg, J.E. (1992). Infant speech perception and phonological acquisition. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 285–311). Timonium, MD: York Press.
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 130–155). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.Google Scholar