Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T20:00:13.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WORD FREQUENCY, COLLOCATIONAL FREQUENCY, L1 CONGRUENCY, AND PROFICIENCY IN L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING

WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR L2 PERFORMANCE?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

Brent Wolter  and
Junko Yamashita
Brent Wolter*
Affiliation:
Ocean University of China Idaho State University
Junko Yamashita
Affiliation:
Nagoya University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Brent Wolter, Department of English and Philosophy, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Avenue, Stop 8056, Pocatello, Idaho 83209-8056. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and L2 proficiency, on L2 collocational processing. Two groups of L1 Japanese speakers of English (intermediate and advanced) and one group of English native speakers (NSs) performed an online acceptability judgment task on four types of adjective-noun constructions: (1) congruent collocations, (2) English-only collocations, (3) Japanese-only collocations, and (4) baseline items. Response times were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling and correlations. In contrast to NSs, nonnative speakers (NNSs) processed congruent collocations significantly faster than English-only collocations. As for frequency, all three groups demonstrated sensitivity to both word-level and collocation-level frequency. However, the distributions differed across the three groups. We concluded that age/order of acquisition effects (Carroll & White, 1973) provided the best explanation for the congruency results. Regarding the frequency results, we concluded that the findings conflict with claims that NNSs may process formulaic sequences differently than NSs (e.g., Wray, 2002, 2008).

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 395 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to acknowledge the help of the participants who took part in this study and the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, K. (2016). MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.6. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.Google Scholar
Biskup, D. (1992). LI influence on learners’ renderings of English collocations: A Polish/German empirical study. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Bejoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 85–93). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2014). Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 784–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2015). Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 299–317.Google Scholar
Carrol, G., Conklin, K., & Gyllstad, H. (2016). Found in translation: The influence of the L1 on the reading of idioms in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 403–443.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J., & Bock, K. (1997). That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory and Cognition, 25, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Google Scholar
Durrant, P. (2014). Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19, 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103–1123.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning, 67, 130–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166, 94–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Cowie, A. P. (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and application (pp. 145–160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B. (2013). Research on L2 learners’ collocational competence and development—A progress report. In Bardel, C., Lindqvist, C., & Laufer, B. (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use—New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 29–56). Eurosla Monograph Series 2: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B., & Stenius Staehr, L. (2009). Processes in the development of L2 collocational knowledge—A challenge for language learners, researchers and teachers. In Barfield, A. & Gyllstad, H. (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations (pp. 224–231). Basingstoke, UK, and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izura, C., Pérez, M. A., Agallou, E., Wright, V. C., Marín, J., & Stadthagen-González, H. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JACET Committee of Basic Words Revision (Ed.). (2003). JACET list of 8000 basic words: JACET 8000. Tokyo: Japan Association of College English Teachers.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopka, A., & Bock, K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 68–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-29. Retrieved from https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lmerTest.Google Scholar
Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13, 928–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, , Russell, V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Gradual unlearning and catastrophic interference: A comparison of distributed architectures. In Hockley, W. E., & Lewandowsky, S. (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennett B. Murdock (pp. 445–476). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). Connectionism and language learning. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 121–149). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 109–165). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1990). Eurocentres vocabulary size tests 10KA. Zurich: Eurocentres Learning Service.Google Scholar
Miki, K. (2010). An access to English homographic words of Japanese EFL learners. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Nishinomiya, Japan: Kwansei Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Canal, P. Vespignani, F., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2013). Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 762–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling—Sound consistency in word naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 183.Google ScholarPubMed
Naimi, B. (2015). USDM: Uncertainty analysis for species distribution models. R package version 1.1-15. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=usdm.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2004). What are collocations? In Allerton, D. J., Nesselhauf, N., & Skandera, P. (Eds.), Phraseological units: Basic concepts and their application (pp. 1–21). Basel, Switzerland: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R., Burgess, C., Dell, G., & Eberhard, K. (2001). Disassociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1223–1237.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, N. E., & Sharkey, A. J. C. (1995). An analysis of catastrophic interference. Connection Science, 7, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the “holistic” nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11, 258–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Heuven, W. J. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 776–784.Google ScholarPubMed
Snider, N., & Arnon, I. (2012). A unified lexicon and grammar? Compositional and non-compositional phrases in the lexicon. In Gries, S., & Divjak, D. (Eds.), Frequency effects in language (pp. 127–163). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sprenger, S., Levelt, W., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In Wood, D. (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London, UK: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 34–80.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2015). Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation? Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1193–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar