Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:29:42.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Causal Reasoning and Language Competence in Narrative Comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Yukie Horiba
Yukie Horiba
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study investigates the role of causal reasoning in second language (L2) narrative comprehension. Subjects read and recalled texts that were either high or low in causal coherence. This read-and-recall procedure was repeated. Half of the subjects reported their thoughts during reading. The major finding was that first language (L1) readers recalled the high coherence texts better than the low coherence texts. Advanced L2 readers showed a similar advantage for thehigh coherence texts, but only in their second reading. Intermediate readers' recall was lower and showed no advantage for highly coherent texts. The verbal report data generally supported these patterns. These results indicate that L2 readers have difficulty detecting the higher order causal structure in texts. This structure is a central component of L1 readers' mental representation of the information in a text. As L2 readers' skills improve, their ability to detect causal relations increases, although even advanced L2 readers may need a second reading to do so.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 49 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, S. (1982). Scripts and recognition of unfamiliar vocabulary: Enhancing second language reading skills. The Modern Language Journal, 66, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In Britton, B. K. & Black, J. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L. (1984). Evidence of a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1987). Introspection in second language research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, C. R., Hummel, J. E., & Marsolek, C. J. (1990). Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 233–240.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldman, S. R., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1986). Children and adults' memory for embedded and sequential episodes in stories. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, M. L. A., & Honore, A. M. (1959). Causation in the law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y. (1990). Narrative comprehension processes: A study of native and non-native readers of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 188–202.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y., van den Broek, P. W., & Fletcher, C. R. (1992). Second language readers' memory for narrative texts: Evidence for structure-based top-down processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L. (1990). Causal relatedness and text comprehension. In Balota, D. A., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K. (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 361–375). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
O'Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory and Cognition, 15, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In Kieras, D. E. & Just, M. A. (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 253–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Omanson, R. C. (1982). The relation between centrality and story category variation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Nodes on a schema for stories. In Bobrow, D. G. & Collins, A. M. (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Samuels, S. J. (1977). Introduction to theoretical models of reading. In Otto, W. (Ed.), Reading problems (pp. 7–41). Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1975). The structure of episodes in memory. In Bobrow, D. G. & Collins, A. (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 237–272). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In Freedle, R. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In Mandl, H., Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. L. (1985). The causal basis for deciding importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. W., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1977). The construction and use of a propositional text base (Tech. Rep. No. 63). Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P. W. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P. W., & Trabasso, T. (1986). Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Walters, J., & Wolf, Y. (1986). Language proficiency, text content and order effects in narrative recall. Language Learning, 36, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar