Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:55:27.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REGULATORY FIT EFFECTS ON THE ACQUISITION OF LEXICAL STRESS

A CLASSROOM-BASED STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2021

Minyoung Cho Open the ORCID record for Minyoung Cho [Opens in a new window]
Minyoung Cho*
Affiliation:
Korea University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Minyoung Cho, English Language and Literature, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul02841, Korea (ROK). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Higgins’s (2000) regulatory fit theory proposes that a fit between one’s regulatory state and strategic means for reaching a goal increases motivational strength and engagement. This study investigates how regulatory fit affects the L2 acquisition of lexical stress in an authentic learning context. Ninety EFL students were assigned to either gain frame or loss frame conditions. They engaged in speech practice in which they mimicked a model speech in English to win a chance to enter a prize raffle. The reward system was framed differently in the two framing conditions, with the intention of eliciting the participants’ use of eager or vigilant strategies, thus creating fit and nonfit conditions. Acquisition of lexical stress was assessed using pre- and posttest scores. Multiple regression analysis showed no regulatory fit effects and no loss frame effects but did show a significant beneficial effect of the gain frame on the acquisition of lexical stress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , December 2021 , pp. 1094 - 1115
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers and the editor of SSLA for their insightful feedback and suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1994). Understanding words. In Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., Pollitt, A., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Language and understanding (pp. 83–95). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance” fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. H., Kee, Y. H., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, S. H. (2016). Improving motor performance during initial skills acquisition through regulatory fit: An experimental study based on ball throwing task and small financial reward. Current Psychology, 35, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Connell, K., Hüls, S., Martínez-García, M. T., Qin, Z., Shin, S., Yan, H., & Tremblay, A. (2018). English learners’ use of segmental and suprasegmental cues to stress in lexical access: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 68, 635–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Routledge.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–41). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P.D., & Henry, A. (2015) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, A. R. (1995). Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 530–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A-G, & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A.-M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, L. R., Markman, A. B., Maddox, W. T., & Baldwin, G. C. (2008). Differential effects of regulatory fit on category learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 920–927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y., & McDonough, K. (2018). Korean L2 speakers’ regulatory focus and oral task performance. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56, 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 967–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (2014). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T., & Cornwell, J. F. (2016). Securing foundations and advancing frontiers: Prevention and promotion effects on judgment & decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Y., Kim, Y., & Murphy, J. (2017). The role of task repetition in learning word-stress patterns through auditory priming tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissling, E. M. (2018). Pronunciation instruction can improve L2 learners’ bottom-up processing for listening. Modern Language Journal, 102, 653–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalot, F., Quiamzade, A., & Zerhouni, O. (2018). Regulatory focus and self-determination motives interact to predict students’ nutrition-habit intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 25, 477–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Laroche, M., Roussel, P., Cury, F., & Boiché, J. (2019). Understanding the dynamics of physical activity practice in the health context through regulatory focus and self-determination theories. PLoS ONE, 14: e0216760 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P.D., & Henry, A. (Eds.), Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning (pp. 109–138). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Maddox, W. T., Baldwin, G. C., & Markman, A. B. (2006). A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual category learning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1377–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, W. T., & Markman, A. B. (2010). The motivation-cognition interface in learning and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, A. B., Baldwin, G. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). The interaction of payoff structure and regulatory focus in classification. Psychological Science, 16, 852–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, A. B., Maddox, W. T., Worthy, D. A., & Baldwin, G. C. (2007). Using regulatory focus to explore implicit and explicit processing in concept learning. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 132–155.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, M. (2009). Persistence in Japanese language study and learners’ cultural/linguistic backgrounds. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 10.1–10.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. (2004). Attending to word-stress while learning new vocabulary. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papi, M. (2018). Motivation as quality: Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 707–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A. V., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., & Jiang, C. (2019). Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2 × 2 model of L2 self-guides. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papi, M., & Khajavy, G. H. (2021). Motivational mechanisms underlying second language achievement: A regulatory focus perspective. Language Learning, 71, 537–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, E. T., & Suter, R. W. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning, 30, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousu, M. C., Corrigan, J. R., Harris, D., Hayter, J. K., Houser, S., Lafrancois, B. A., Onafowora, O., Colson, G., & Hoffer, A. (2015). Do monetary incentives matter in classroom experiments? Effects on course performance. The Journal of Economic Education, 46, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21, 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. In Oxford, R. (Ed.), Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century (pp. 9–70). University of Hawai`i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, M., & Landon, M. (2009). The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 51–65.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language learning, 41, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivational construct in language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K., & Foote, J. A. (2014). Interactive alignment of multisyllabic stress patterns in a second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 815–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, W. T., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58, 357–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 1084–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar