Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:41:10.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LEARNING FORMULAIC SEQUENCES THROUGH VIEWING L2 TELEVISION AND FACTORS THAT AFFECT LEARNING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Eva Puimège Open the ORCID record for Eva Puimège [Opens in a new window]  and
Elke Peters
Eva Puimège*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
Elke Peters
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eva Puimège, PhD Fellowship of the Research Foundation – Flanders, KU Leuven, Faculty of Arts, Campus Antwerp, Sint-Andriesstraat 2, B-2000 ANTWERP. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study explores the incidental learning of formulaic sequences (FS) from audio-visual input and factors affecting the learning of FS. A pretest-posttest, within-participant design was adopted. English-as-a-foreign-language learners (L1 = Dutch; n = 42) watched a one-hour English-language documentary without subtitles. Learning gains were measured at the level of form recall and meaning recall. Significant learning gains were found in both the form recall and meaning recall tests, indicating that several knowledge aspects of FS can be learned incidentally from audio-visual input. The findings also revealed a positive relationship between learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge and the learning gains. Further, several item-related factors affected the learning gains (e.g., collocate-node relationship, frequency). Finally, the findings showed the incremental nature of learning FS, as preknowledge of the meaning of the FS prior to the TV viewing was the strongest predictor of learning the form of FS.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 42 , Special Issue 3: Language Learning from Multimodal Input , July 2020 , pp. 525 - 549
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 275–311. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bibCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 54–74. doi: 10.1177/1362168813505389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–109. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Compleat Lexical Tutor (Version 8.3) [Online resource]. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2007). Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 38–63.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36, 570–590. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt056Google Scholar
Durrant, P. (2014). Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19, 443–477. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.19.4.01durCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163–188. doi: 10.1177/0267658309349431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20, 29–62. doi: 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S. (2008). Corpora and collocations. In Lüdeling, A. & Kytö, M., (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 1212–1248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing. Which mode of input is most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/S0272263119000494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? System, 59, 29–44. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166, 94–126. doi: 10.1075/itl.166.1.03ferCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In Granger, S. & Meunier, F. (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–49). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grant, L., & Bauer, L. (2004). Criteria for redefining idioms: Are we barking up the wrong tree? Applied Linguistics, 25, 38–61. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.1.38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, J. W., & Iwasaki, M. (2007). A truly multivariate approach to MANOVA. Applied Multivariate Research, 12, 199–226. doi: 10.22329/amr.v12i3.660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H., & Wolter, B. (2016). Collocational processing in light of the phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter? Language Learning, 66, 296–323. doi: 10.1111/lang.12143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, M., & Meara, P. (1999). Test of a model for predicting second language lexical growth through reading. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 308–328. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.56.2.308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch12Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2632–2640). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0530Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7–36. doi: 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Lin, P. M. S. (2014). Investigating the validity of Internet television as a resource for acquiring L2 formulaic sequences. System, 42, 164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macis, M. (2018). Incidental learning of duplex collocations from reading: Three case studies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30, 48–75.Google Scholar
Macis, M., & Schmitt, N. (2017). Not just “small potatoes”: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 321–340. doi: 10.1177/1362168816645957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014). Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118–141. doi: 10125/44357Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 94–106. doi: 10.2307/747835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2016). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 298–320. doi: 10.1177/1362168816639619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2017). L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research, 33, 13–32. doi: 10.1177/0267658315620265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 381–402. doi: 10.1177/1362168815618428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 75–94. doi: 10.1177/1362168813505384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113–138. doi: 10.1177/1362168814568131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners' vocabulary knowledge. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 142–168. doi: 10.1075/itl.00010.petCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. (2019). The effect of imagery and on-screen text on foreign language vocabulary learning from audio-visual input. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/tesq.531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimège, E. (2016). Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134–148. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Noreillie, A., Heylen, K., Bulté, B., & Desmet, P. (2019). The impact of instruction and out‐of‐school exposure to foreign language input on learners’ vocabulary knowledge in two languages. Language Learning, 69, 747–782. doi: 10.1111/lang.12351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 551–557. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019a). Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: An exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 424–438. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019b). Learners’ English vocabulary knowledge prior to formal instruction: The effect of learner-related and word-related factors. Language Learning, 69, 943–977. doi: 10.1111/lang.12364Google Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H. (2018). The images in television programs and the potential for learning unknown words: The relationship between on-screen imagery and vocabulary. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 191–211. doi: 10.1075/itl.00012.rodCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning from viewing television. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics . Advance online publication. doi: 10.1075/itl.18034.rodCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez, R. (2015). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 26, 549–569. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt054Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2019). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P. (2012). Effects of meaning- and formed-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb–noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1, 3–37.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 245–265. doi: 10.1111/ijal.12092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (2012). Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on language resources and evaluation. Istanbul: LREC.Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 155–172). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2012). Formulaic language and language disorders. The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 62–80. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How do frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19, 667–686. doi: 10.1177/1362168814559800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2011). Learning collocations: Do the number of collocates, position of the node word, and synonymy affect learning? Applied Linguistics, 32, 259–276. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59, 335–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2018). Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing: What accounts for L2 performance? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 395–416. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668. doi: 10.2307/27896758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Puimège et al. Supplementary material

Supporting Information

Download Puimège et al. Supplementary material(File)
File 81.9 KB