Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:24:20.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Distance and the Magnitude of the Language Learning Task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

S. P. Corder
S. P. Corder
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A learner brings to the classroom many characteristics which are relevant to predictions about his career as a language learner. These characteristics are the product of his membership of a community; he shares its language and its attitudes to, beliefs about, motivations for and traditions in, language learning in general, and in the learning of specific second languages. And he possesses particular features of personality as formed by his personal history of maturation and experience. I am concerned in this paper with the role of only two of these characteristics, both related to the community he belongs to: the nature of his mother tongue and any other languages known to him, and the beliefs current in his community, which he presumably shares, as to the nature, extent and probable success in the learning task which lies ahead of him.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Fall 1979 , pp. 27 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, N., Madden, C. & Krashen, S. 1974. Is there a Natural Sequence in Adult Second Language Acquisition? Language Learning, 24. 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M. 1968. Zum Pidgin-Deutsch der Gastarbeiter. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung, 35. 130–139.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1967. The Significance of Learners' Errors, IRAL 5.4. 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1973. Introducing Applied Linguistics. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1977a. Language Continua and the Interlanguage Hypothesis. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) Proceedings of the Vth Neuchatel Colloquium, Librairie Droz: Geneva.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1977b. Simple Codes and the Source of the Second Language Learner's Initial Heuristic Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(1) 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1977c. The Language of Kehaar. RELC Journal, 8.2. 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, L.J. 1975 The Learner's Interlanguage as a System of Variable Rules, TESOL Quarterly, 9.4.401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. 1973 Should we teach Children Syntax? Language Learning, 23.2. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. 1974. Natural Sequences in Child Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning, 24.1.37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1974. Is Second Language Learning like the First? TESOL Quarterly, 8.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. & Wagner-Gough, J. 1976. Explaining Sequence and Variation in Second Language Acquisition. In Brown D. (ed.) Papers in Second Language Acquisition, Special Issue No. 4 Language Learning.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. 1977 Implicational Patterns in Interlanguage Syntax Variation, Language Learning, 27.2.383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1977 Towards the Characterization of the Strategy of Transfer in Second Language Learning, I.S.B. 2.1. 58–146.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1978. Giving the Learners a Break; Natural Language Institutions as a Source of Predictions about Transferability, WPB 15 59–93.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1977 Some Issues relating to the Monitor Model. On TESOL 77, TESOL: Washington.Google Scholar
Lado, R. 1961. Linguistics across Cultures, University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1975. The Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes by Adult Second Language Students, TESOL Quarterly 9.4. 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, L. 1966. How not to Interfere with Language Learning, In Language Learning; the Individual and the Process, Int. Rev. American Linguistics, 40. 77–83.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (forthcoming). Erwerbsequenzen und Lehrprogression. Überlegungen zur Steuerung des Zweitsprachenwerbs ausländischer Arbeiterkinder, Forschungsgruppe Wuppertal.Google Scholar
Platt, J. 1977. The ‘Creoloid’ as a Special Type of Interlanguage, I.S.B. 2.3. 22–39.Google Scholar
Rosansky, E. 1976. Methods and Morphemes in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning, 26.409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J.H. 1974. The Implications of Pidginisation and Creolisation for the Study of Adult Second Language Acquisition, TESOL Quarterly, 8.2. 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E., Cohen, A.D. & Dumas, G. 1976. A Closer Look at some Inter-language Terminology; A Framework for Communication Strategies. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 9. 76–91.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. 1975 The Use of Overgeneralization and Transfer Learning Strategies by Elementary and Intermediate Students in ESL, Language Learning, 25.73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. 1973 Some thoughts on Natural Syntactic Processes. In Bailey, , and Shuy, R.W. (eds.) New Ways of Analysing Variation in English, Georgetown University Press: Washington.Google Scholar
Valdman, A. 1978. On the Relevance of the Pidginisation-Creolisation Model for Second Language Learning, Proceedings of the VI th Neuchatel Colloquium 1977, Studies in Second Language Acquisition (2) 55–75.Google Scholar