Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:33:49.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INITIAL PROFICIENCY AND L2 GRAMMAR DEVELOPMENT DURING SHORT-TERM IMMERSION ABROAD

CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL INSIGHTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2020

Janire Zalbidea Open the ORCID record for Janire Zalbidea [Opens in a new window] ,
Bernard I. Issa Open the ORCID record for Bernard I. Issa [Opens in a new window] ,
Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg Open the ORCID record for Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg [Opens in a new window]  and
Cristina Sanz
Janire Zalbidea*
Affiliation:
Temple University
Bernard I. Issa
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Cristina Sanz
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Janire Zalbidea, Department of Spanish and Portuguese, Temple University, Anderson Hall 413, 1114 W. Polett Walk, Philadelphia, PA19122. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first goal of this study was to examine how individual differences in initial L2 proficiency help explain L2 grammar development in oral production during short-term immersion abroad. The second goal of the study was methodological, and evaluated challenges that can result from operationalizing learners’ initial L2 proficiency as pretest performance on outcome measures (as opposed to independent proficiency measures) in analyses of L2 change. L2 Spanish learners participating in summer study abroad completed an elicited imitation task and two oral production tasks. Production data were analyzed for changes in relevant grammatical complexity and accuracy dimensions. Results indicate that learners with higher initial L2 proficiency experience greater L2 grammar advancement from short-term immersion, and that pretest performance can be an unreliable operational estimate of initial proficiency when analyzing L2 gains. We discuss findings following cognitive accounts of SLA, and highlight methodological implications for further research in immersion contexts and beyond.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 239 - 267
Check for updates
Open Practices
Open materials
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The experiment in this article earned Open Data and Open Materials badges for transparent practices. The data and materials are available at https://osf.io/nca3m/?view_only=2f238b3cec1b471797c9a89bdaa98d6f

This research was partially funded by a Professional and Scholarly Development Award from the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. We are grateful to Alfonso Hernanz, Lauren Jones, Helen Spader, Fermin Luna, and Kyrie Miranda for their assistance with various aspects of this research. We would also like to thank the SSLA editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. All errors are our own.

References

REFERENCES

Alarcón, I. V. (2010). Gender assignment and agreement in L2 Spanish: The effects of morphological marking, animacy, and gender. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3, 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker‐Smemoe, W., Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. A. (2014). Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 464–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, H. W. (2016). Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish Elicited Imitation Task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 647–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, R. D., Davidson, D. E., & Ginsberg, R. B. (1995). Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. In Freed, B. F. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 37-66). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, R. D., & Robinson, J. L. (1995). On the value of formal instruction in study abroad. In Freed, B. F. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 318–334). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. Guilford.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J. (2009). Study abroad research: Findings, implications, and future directions. In Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. J. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 218–233). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. E. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2010). Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, L., & Engle, J. (2004). Assessing language acquisition and intercultural sensitivity development in relation to study abroad program design. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). Contributions of initial proficiency and language use to second-language development during study abroad: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence. In Sanz, C. & Morales-Front, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice (pp. 421–435). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). Language learning and study abroad. In Freed, B. F. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 3–33). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golonka, E. M. (2006). Predictors revised: Linguistic knowledge and metalinguistic awareness in second language gain in Russian. Modern Language Journal, 90, 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short‐term intensive language exposure. Modern Language Journal, 99, 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of International Education (2019). Open Doors Data Summary. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors/Data/US-Study-Abroad/Duration-of-Study-Abroad Google Scholar
Isabelli‐García, C. (2010). Acquisition of Spanish gender agreement in two learning contexts: Study abroad and at home. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B., & Zalbidea, J. (2018). Proficiency levels in study abroad: Is there an optimal time for sojourning? In Sanz, C. & Morales-Front, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice (pp. 453–463). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H. (2015). Multiple regression. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing qualitative methods in second language research (pp. 131–158). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachigan, S. K. (1991). Multivariate statistical analysis: A conceptual introduction (2nd ed.). Radius Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition (KBIT-2): Manual. NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Lafford, B., & Collentine, J. (2006). The effect of study abroad and classroom contexts on the acquisition of Spanish as a second language: From research to application. In Salaberry, R. & Lafford, B. (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition: From research to application (pp. 103–126). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, K. R., & Shea, C. E. (2017). L2 speaking development during study abroad: Fluency, accuracy, complexity, and underlying cognitive factors. Modern Language Journal, 101, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llanes, A., & Muñoz, C. (2009). A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System, 37, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2017). Instructed Second Language Acquisition (ISLA): An overview . In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 1–12). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marijuan, S., & Sanz, C. (2018). Expanding boundaries: Current and new directions in study abroad research and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Data, open science, and methodological reform in second language acquisition research. In Gudmestad, A. & Edmonds, A. (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 219–228). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C., & Valls‐Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 610–641.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2012). Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2000). Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Rabie, S., & Norris, J. M. (1999). A multilanguage comparison of measures of syntactic complexity [Funded project]. University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. O., McAbee, S. T., Redick, T. S., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2015). The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1343–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. Modern Language Journal, 102, 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, V. (2003). L’acquisition de la variation native par les apprenants L2 pendant un séjour dans la communauté linguistique native et dans la sale de classe: Le cas des apprenants irlandais du Français langue seconde. Journal of Educational Thought, 37, 283–301.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D. R. (2017). Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 752–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (2012). Profiles of more and less successful L2 learners: A cluster analysis study. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraday, M., & Wieczorek-Taraday, A. (2018). Regression toward the mean. In Frey, B. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (pp. 1393–1395). Sage.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, B., & Ortega, L. (2017). Fluency and multilingualism in study abroad: Lessons from a scoping review. System, 71, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Berg, M., Connor-Linton, J., & Paige, R. M. (2009). The Georgetown consortium project: Interventions for student learning abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 18, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., & Gass, S. M. (2018). Individual differences in advanced proficiency. In Malovrh, P. A. & Benati, A. G. (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 157–178). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S. L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 680–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, R., & Chen, L. (2015). The need to control for regression to the mean in social psychology studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Zalbidea et al. supplementary material

Appendix S1-S4

Download Zalbidea et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 535.3 KB