Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:11:41.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Easifying second language learning1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Andrew D. Cohen  and
Edna Aphek
Andrew D. Cohen
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Edna Aphek
Affiliation:
Neve Sehechter, Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent research has focused increasingly on the good language learner (Rubin 1975; Naiman, Frohlich, and Stern 1978; Wesche 1977; Hosenfeld, 1976; Bialystok and Frohlich 1977a, 1977b; Cohen and Robbins 1976; Cohen 1977). A distinction that has gained currency is that between acquiring a second language and the conscious learning of the language through what Krashen (1977) refers to as “monitoring.” The studies reported in this paper concentrate on the identification of successful learning strategies—strategies that could actually be taught to language learners to help them maximize the benefits of conscious language learning. It is not very clear which behaviors actually promote success. Learners themselves may not pay conscious attention to what they do. In order to identify strategies, therefore, we must focus our attention on basic aspects of the language learning process and also on the interaction between the learner and the teacher.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1981 , pp. 221 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. C. 1975. Mnemonotechnics and second-language learning. American Psychologist 30.821–28.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., and Frohlich, M.. 1977a. Aspects of second language learning in classroom settings. Working Papers on Bilingualism 13.1–26.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., and Frohlich, M.. 1977b. Second language learning and teaching in classroom settings: learning study. Year one. Toronto: Modern Language Centre, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. 1977. Successful second-language speakers: a review of research literature. Balshanut Shimushit 1.3–23. ERIC ED 142 085.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D.. (In press). Testing language ability in the language classroom. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., and Robbins, M.. 1976. Toward assessing interlanguage performance: the relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' explanations. Language Learning 26.45–66.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., and Aphek, E.. 1979a. Easifying second language learning. Report funded by Brandeis University and submitted to the Jacob Hiatt Institute, Jerusalem, Israel. ERIC FL 009 721.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., and Aphek, E.. 1979b. Retention of second-language vocabulary over time: experimenting with associations. Revised version of a paper presented at the 13th Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, Feb. 27–Mar. 4, 1979.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1977. Cognitive processes in second language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 15.1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, L. W. 1976. The second time around: cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. Stanford University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Henning, G. 1973. Remembering foreign language vocabulary: acoustic and semantic parameters. Language Learning 23.185–96.Google Scholar
Hosenfeld, C. 1976. Learning about learning: discovering our students' strategies. Foreign Language Annals 9.117–29.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1977. Some issues relating to the monitor model. On TESOL '77 teaching and learning English as a second language, ed. by Brown, H. D., Yorio, C. A., and Crymes, R. H., 144–58. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
Marshall, J.C., Newcombe, F., and Holmes, J. M.. 1975. Lexical memory: a linguistic approach. Studies in long term memory, ed. by Kennedy, A. and Wilkes, A., 315–22. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., and Stern, H. H.. 1978. The good language learner. Toronto: Modern Language Center, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Ott, C. E., Blake, R. S., and Butler, D. C.. 1976. Implications of mental elaboration for the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 14.37–48.Google Scholar
Pollio, H. 1966. The structural basis of word association behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Raugh, M. R., and Atkinson, R. C.. 1975. A mnemonic method for learning a second-language vocabulary. Journal of educational psychology 67.1–16.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. 1976. The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly 10.77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. 1975. What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9.41–51.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1969. Language transfer. General Linguistics 9.67–92.Google Scholar
Stevick, E. W. 1976. Memory, meaning and method. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B. 1977. Learning behaviors of successful adult students on intensive language training. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Service Commission of Canada.Google Scholar