Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:15:42.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classroom Interaction and Discourse Options

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Claire J. Kramsch
Claire J. Kramsch
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article takes a social-theoretical view of the reality created by a foreign language in the classroom. It examines the interaction of teacher and learners in their various activities along a continuum that extends from instructional to natural discourse and is determined by the way participants present themselves to one another and negotiate turns-at-talk, topics, and repairs. Suggestions are made for broadening and diversifying the discourse options in the classroom to enrich the social context of the language learning experience.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 169 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, P., Fröhlich, M., and Spada, N.. 1983. The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. L. 1980. Turns, topics and tasks: patterns of participation in language learning and teaching. In Larsen-Freeman, pp. 165–87.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. L. 1984. The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics 5:156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applegate, J. L. and Delia, J. G.. 1980. Person-centered speech, psychological development and the context of language usage. In St. Clair and Giles, pp. 245–82.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. 1951. Interaction process analysis. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. L'économic des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckman, T.. 1967. The social construction of reality. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Breen, M. and Candlin, C. N.. 1980. The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 1:89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N. (ed.), Questions and politeness—Strategies in social interaction, pp. 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G.. 1983. Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1984. Communicative methodology in language teaching. The roles of accuracy and fluency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N. 1984. Examining asymmetric discourse in a complaint of rape: Where does discourse analysis stop? Paper presented at the Colloquium on Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis and Second Language Acquisition at the 18th Annual TESOL Convention, Houston.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. 1972. Basic and normative rules in the negotiation of status and role. In Sudnow, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. 1981. Routine im Gespräch. Zur pragmatischen Fundierung der Idiomatik Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. and Pica, T.. 1984. Small group work in the ESL classroom: Does it facilitate language acquisition? Paper presented at the 18th Annual TESOL Convention, Houston.Google Scholar
Edmondson, W. and House, J.. 1981. Let's talk and talk about it. A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. and Schultz, J.. 1981. When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Ethnography and language in educational settings, ed. by Green, Judith L. and Wallat, Cynthia, in Advances in discourse processes 5, ed. by Roy O. Freedle, pp. 147–160. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Færch, C. and Kasper, G. (eds.). 1983. Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E.T. 1976. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1982. What place does the native language have in the teaching of English? Paper presented at the 1st TESOL-France Convention, Paris.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. 1978. Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In Hatch, E. (ed.), Second language acquisition: A Book of readings, pp.401–35. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Illich, I. 1973. Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. 1979. Errors in speech act realization and use of gambits. Canadian Modern Language Review 35;395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. 1981. Discourse analysis and second language teaching. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. 1983. Interaction in the classroom: Learning to negotiate roles and meaning. Unterrichtspraxis 2:175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. 1984a. Sensitizing the learner to discourse processes. Paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. 1984b. Interaction et discours dans la classe de langue. Paris: Hatier-Credif.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.). 1980. Discourse analysis in second language research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. 1983. Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly 17;359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., Adams, L., McLean, M., and Castanos, F.. 1976. Doing things with words—verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situation. In Fanselow, John and Crymes, Ruth H. (eds.), On TESOL 76, pp. 137–53. Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Porter, P. A.. 1984. Group work, interlanguage talk and classroom second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 18th Annual TESOL Convention, Houston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. 1979. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, P. 1983. How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto.Google Scholar
Schein, E. 1969. Process consultation: Its role in organizational development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. 1983. Learner interaction in the classroom and its effects on language acquisition. In Sehger and Long, pp. 246–67.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. and Long, M. H. (eds.). 1983. Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
StClair, R. N. and Giles, H. (eds.). 1960. The social and psychological contexts of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. 1983. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sudnow, D. (ed.). 1972. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1983. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, USC.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1979. Processes and consequences of conversational style. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. A. 1984. Cross-cultural differences in speech-act realization. Paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Brussels.Google Scholar
Treichler, P. and Kramarae, C.. 1983. Women's talk in the ivory tower. Communication Quarterly 31; 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. A. W. 1982. Analyzing interaction in second language classrooms. Unpublished dissertation, University of Lancaster, England.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M. and Gass, S.. 1983. Target language input from non-native speakers. Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto.Google Scholar