Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:16:01.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2005

Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers how implicit and explicit knowledge are dissociable but cooperative. It reviews various psychological and neurobiological processes by which explicit knowledge of form-meaning associations impacts upon implicit language learning. The interface is dynamic: It happens transiently during conscious processing, but the influence upon implicit cognition endures thereafter. The primary conscious involvement in SLA is the explicit learning involved in the initial registration of pattern recognizers for constructions that are then tuned and integrated into the system by implicit learning during subsequent input processing. Neural systems in the prefrontal cortex involved in working memory provide attentional selection, perceptual integration, and the unification of consciousness. Neural systems in the hippocampus then bind these disparate cortical representations into unitary episodic representations. These are the mechanisms by which Schmidt's (1990) noticing helps solve Quine's (1960) problem of referential indeterminacy. Explicit memories can also guide the conscious building of novel linguistic utterances through processes of analogy. Formulas, slot-and-frame patterns, drills, and declarative pedagogical grammar rules all contribute to the conscious creation of utterances whose subsequent usage promotes implicit learning and proceduralization. Flawed output can prompt focused feedback by way of recasts that present learners with psycholinguistic data ready for explicit analysis. Other processes of acquisition from output include differentiation, analysis, and preemption. These processes of conscious construction in working memory underpin relationships between individual differences in working memory capacities and language learning aptitude.Thanks to Rod Ellis for first suggesting that I try to write this and to the staff and students at Department of Applied Language Studies and Linguistics University of Auckland (2003), the TESOL Program Temple University Japan (2003), the Chester Language Development Reading Group, and the LOT winter school (2004) for helping me think it through. I am particularly grateful to Michel Paradis, Michael Swan, Karen Roehr, Anne Feryok, and Tamar Keren-Portnoy for pointing their giant biological cameras of consciousness at a prior draft, and for sharing their awareness with me in kindly and constructive fashion. I have learned a lot from it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 305 - 352
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, L. Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69–84.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1992). Automaticity and the ACT-super(*) theory. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 165–180.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133.Google Scholar
Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baars, B. J. (1997a). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 292–309.Google Scholar
Baars, B. J. (1997b). In the theatre of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baars, B. J., Banks, W. P., & Newman, J. B. (Eds.). (2003). Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baars, B. J., & Franklin, S. (2003). How conscious experience and working memory interact. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 166–172.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Implicit memory and errorless learning: A link between cognitive theory and neuropsychological rehabilitation? In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory ( 2nd ed., pp. 309–314). New York: Guilford.
Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–424.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85–97.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 518–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. A. (1994). When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia, 32, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. (1996). Infants' reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations. Child Development, 67, 3135–3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second-language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic, and perceptual strategies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 190–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.). (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brent, M. R. (1994). Surface cues and robust inference as a basis for the early acquisition of subcategorization frames. In L. Gleitman & B. Landau (Eds.), The acquisition of the lexicon (pp. 433–470). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brooks, P., Tomasello, M., Lewis, L., & Dodson, K. (1999). Children's overgeneralization of fixed transitivity verbs: The entrenchment hypothesis. Child Development, 70, 1325–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Carroll, S. E. (1995). The hidden danger of computer modelling: Remarks on Sokolik and Smith's connectionist learning model of French gender. Second Language Research, 11, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E. (1999). Input and SLA: Adults' sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning, 49, 37–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania, 85, 308–323.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In J.-A. Meyer & H. Roitblat (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognition (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (Eds.). (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Chun, A. E., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Errors, interaction, and corrections: A study of native-nonnative conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science, 280, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleeremans, A. (2003). The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, and dissociation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J. (1998). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 81, 576–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–169.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. C., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruise, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993). Attention and non-attentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189–202.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Case, R. (1981). Syntactic form, semantic complexity, and short-term memory: Influences on children's acquisition of new linguistic structures. Developmental Psychology, 17, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Green, E. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2004). Neural mechanisms for access to consciousness. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences ( 3rd ed., pp. 1145–1158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., et al. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 678–680.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J.-P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 100, 8520–8525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. M., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's “processing instruction: An update.” Language Learning, 52, 805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness explained. Allen Lane, UK: Penguin.
Dennett, D. C. (2001). Are we explaining consciousness yet? Cognition, 79, 222–237.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., & Gao, S.-J. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science, 23, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (2004). Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 181–202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edelman, G. M. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
Ellis, N. C. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994a). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ellis, N. C. (1994b). Implicit and explicit processes in language acquisition: An introduction. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ellis, N. C. (1994c). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211–282). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ellis, N. C. (1995a). Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments. Language Awareness, 4, 123–146.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1995b). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 103–128.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297–339.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C. (2004). The associative-cognitive CREED. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ellis, N. C. (in press). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics.
Ellis, N. C. (submitted). Selective attention and transfer in SLA: Frequency, contingency, and salience: Overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics.
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 559–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53–83). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, N. C., Lee, M. W., & Reber, A. S. (1999). Phonological working memory in artificial language acquisition. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wales, Bangor.
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2000). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(suppl. 1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1998). Generalization, simple recurrent networks, and the emergence of structure. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 543–548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A. D., Bruna, O., et al. (2000). A comparison of “errorless” and “trial-and-error” learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, A. P. (2001). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faw, B. (2003). Pre-frontal executive committee for perception, working memory, attention, long-term memory, motor control, and thinking: A tutorial review. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frackowiak, R. S. J., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., Price, C. J., Zeki, S., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Human brain function ( 2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.
French, R. M., & Cleeremans, A. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical, and computational consensus in the making. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 3–66). London: Hogart Press. (Original work published 1923.)CrossRef
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the development of second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 1–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural source of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, M. A., Meeter, M., & Myers, C. E. (2003). Computational models of the hippocampal region: Linking incremental learning and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of argument structure semantics. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003a, February). Constructing meaning. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Tables in Linguistics, Georgetown, Washington, DC.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003b). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Sethuraman, N. (1999). Learning argument structure generalizations. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Golinkoff, R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R., Mervis, C. B., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: The case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language, 21, 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gould, S. J. (1982). The panda's thumb: More reflections on natural history. New York: W.W. Norton.
Gregg, K. R. (2003). The state of emergentism in SLA. Second Language Research, 19, 95–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, E. R. (1959). Association by contiguity. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 158–195). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Han, C. J., O'Tuathaigh, C. M., van Trigt, L., Quinn, J. J., Fanselow, M. S., Mongeau, R., et al. (2003). Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 100, 13,087–13,092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behaviour. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hebb, D. O. (1961). Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal. In J. F. Delafresnaye (Ed.), Brain mechanisms and learning (pp. 37–46). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hofstadter, D., & Group, T. F. A. R. (1996). Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanism of thought. New York: Basic Books.
Hofstadter, D., & Mitchell, M. (1994). The copycat project: A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory: Vol. 2. Analogical connections (pp. 31–112). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hulstijn, J. H., & DeKeyser, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Testing SLA theory in the research laboratory [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., et al. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. London: Longman.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.
Jerison, H. J. (1976). Paleoneurology and the evolution of mind. Scientific American, 234, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (2003). Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (2002). Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 39–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of working memory: Individual differences in comprehension. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science ( 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kanwisher, N. (2001). Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition, 79, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Tulving, E., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., & Brown, G. M. (1994, June). Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: Levels of processing effect. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro- and macro-developmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kazdin, A. E. (2000). Behavior modification in applied settings ( 6th ed.). New York: Wadsworth.
Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (in press). Investigating the empirical link between interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In L. Ortega & J. Norris (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case-marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543–587.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 48, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. (2004). The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach. Englewood, CO: Roberts.
Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2000). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 343–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 45–78). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschke, J. K., & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect.” In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 121–154). Timonium, MD: York Press.
LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing: The brain's art of mindfulness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Lachter, J., & Bever, T. (1988). The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning: A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition, 28, 195–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 33, 41–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., & White, L. (Eds.). (1993). The role of instruction in second language acquisition [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265–318). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lockhart, R. S. (2002). Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory, 10, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983a). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359–382.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983b). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177–193.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1987). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. H. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339–354). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.
Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences in L2 learning (pp. 181–210). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B. (1987a). Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 315–327.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1987b). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B. (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan (Ed.), Linguistic categorization (pp. 195–242). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Implicit and explicit processes: Commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B. (2001a). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2001b). Emergentist approaches to language. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 449–470). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 255–277.Google Scholar
Mangan, B. (1993). Taking phenomenology seriously: The “fringe” and its implications for cognitive research. Consciousness and Cognition, 2, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1982). The child's construction of grammatical categories. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 240–266). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Markman, E. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Matessa, M., & Anderson, J. R. (2000). Modeling focused learning in role assignment. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Teaching the /r/-/l/ discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. (1995). Constructive memory and memory distortions: A parallel distributed processing approach. In D. L. Schacter (Ed.), Memory distortions: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past (pp. 69–90). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McClelland, J. L. (1998). Complementary learning systems in the brain: A connectionist approach to explicit and implicit cognition and memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 843, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. (2001). Failures to learn and their remediation: A Hebbian account. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives—Carnegie Mellon symposia on cognition (pp. 97–121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McClelland, J. L., Fiez, J. A., & McCandliss, B. D. (2002). Teaching the /r/-/l/ discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.
McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, W. (1999). Competition, attention, and young children's lexical processing. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 331–358). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovitch, M. (1992). Memory and working-with-memory: A component process model based on modules and central systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartsz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–108.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2003). The radical middle: Nativism without Universal Grammar. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 43–62). Oxford: Blackwell.
O'Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS/NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–420). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Parkin, A. (1987). Memory and amnesia: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). London: Longman.
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1975). Equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., et al. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414, 546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
Poulisse, N. (1999). Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in first and second language production. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1984). On the use of compensatory strategies in second language performance. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 8, 70–105.Google Scholar
Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2003). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reason, J. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 515–549). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reber, A. S., Kassin, S. M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. W. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492–502.Google Scholar
Rees, G. (2001a). Neuroimaging of visual awareness in patients and normal subjects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 150–156.Google Scholar
Rees, G. (2001b). Seeing is not perceiving. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 678–680.Google Scholar
Rees, G., Kreiman, G., & Koch, C. (2002). Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 3, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, T. (2003). Emergent constraints on word-learning: A computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H., & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 89–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L. I. (2000). Why retrieval is the key process in understanding human memory. In E. Tulving (Ed.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain: The Tallinn conference (pp. 52–75). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 272–326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Saffran, J. R. (2001). The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422–451.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1984). The strengths and limitations of acquisition: A case study of an untutored language learner. Language, Learning, and Communication, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–210). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Schooler, L. J., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 219–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott Kelso, J. A. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scott Kelso, J. A. (2002). The complementary nature of coordination dynamics: Self-organization and agency. Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems, 5, 364–371.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T., Fletcher, P., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1994). Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature, 368, 633–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sharwood Smith, M. (1978). Applied linguistics and the psychology of instruction: A case for transfusion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1, 91–117.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness raising and the second-language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–168.Google Scholar
Singer, W. (1999). Neural synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24, 49–65.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skousen, R. (1995). Analogy: A non-rule alternative to neural networks. Rivista di linguistica, 7, 213–231.Google Scholar
Skousen, R., Lonsdale, D., & Parkison, D. (Eds.). (2003). Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolik, M. E., & Smith, M. (1992). Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and second language acquisition: A connectionist model. Second Language Research, 8, 39–58.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Research, 30, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1999). Memory: From mind to molecules. New York: Scientific American Library.
Stadler, M. A., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1998). Implicit learning handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stahl, S. A. (1999). Vocabulary development. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C. E., Corkin, S., Gonzalez, R. G., Guimaraes, A. R., & Baker, J. R. (1996, August). The hippocampus participates in novel picture encoding: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive process they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraban, R., & Roark, B. (1996). Competition in language-based categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1997). Analyzing IL in natural settings: A sociolinguistic perspective of second-language acquisition. Communication and Cognition, 30, 137–150.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. Modern Language Journal, 75, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Tomasello, M. (Ed.). (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Akhtar, N. (2000). Five questions for any theory of word learning. In R. Golinkoff (Ed.), Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition (pp. 179–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralisation errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention, and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 353, 1295–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., & Houle, S. (1994, June). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission findings. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
VanLehn, K., Jones, R., & Chi, M. (1992). A model of the self-explanation effect. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Westport, CT: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2002). From parts to wholes and back again. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 403–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, A. D., Schacter, D. L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A. M., et al. (1998). Building memories: Remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science, 281, 1188–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. E., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. E., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, aptitude, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1–48.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53, 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.