No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
The theme of this volume has been defined as ‘the sources, materials and methods of ecclesiastical history’. After the illuminating, fruitful and often racy subjects which have been discussed in earlier volumes in this series, a theme such as this may at first sight appear to be sober to the point of dullness. I hope to show that it is not, and I make no excuse for presenting it. We are historians, knowing that the study of history is a complex affair, demanding a high degree of imaginative understanding and at the same time a great deal of patient, accurate and often very exacting craftsmanship. Before we can understand what ecclesiastical history is about, either we must go back to its sources, with all the problems of time, language and palaeography which that process entails, or we must at least possess sufficient knowledge to enable us to form some reasonable opinion about the validity of the methods used by those who have cleared the ground for us. Not all historians have the time, or indeed the inclination, to edit texts, but all of us are to an increasing extent dependent upon the work of those who do edit them. A medieval scholar might perhaps have compared the two sides of the historian’s work, the interpretation of ideas and the transcription or calendering of records, to those two great ‘types’ of the contemplative and the practical life, the sisters Mary and Martha. The two were interdependent, and they lived in one house. True, it was the spiritually-minded Mary who chose the good part, while Martha’s obsession with the practical problems of housekeeping earned her a gentle but unmistakable reproof which historians would do well to take to heart.
1 HE V, 14.
2 The Diary of a Country Parson, ed Beresford, J. (Oxford 1924) I, p 75.Google Scholar
3 Murphy, G., Early Irish Lyrics (Oxford 1956) p 4.Google Scholar
4 Rule of St Benedict, cap 43.
5 Haddon, A.W. and Stubbs, W., Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents, 3 vols (Oxford 1871) III p 198.Google Scholar
6 Chronica Majora, ed Luard, H.R., RS, 7 vols (1880) V, pp 254–5.Google Scholar
7 Acts 6, 1-2.
8 Smith, D.M. A guide to the Archive Collections in the Borthwick Institute of Historical Research (York 1973).Google Scholar
9 LRS 48, p 10.
10 Register qf William Melton, fol 489V.
11 Ibid fol 449.
12 Rolls and Register of Oliver Sutton, Stow Roll, m. 2.
13 SS 169 (1970) p 77 and SS 170 (1970) p 19.
14 Register of William Melton, fol 5oov.
15 Marrett, W.P., A Calendar of the Register of Henry Wakefield, Bishop of Wor cester 1375-95 (Wore Hist Soc, 1972).Google Scholar
16 Register of Robert Braybrooke, fols 109 and 163.
17 Lucretius, De Natura Rerum, II, 79.