No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Roman Imperium and the Restoration Church
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2018
Abstract
This article examines the late-seventeenth-century Church of England's understanding of rulers’ ecclesiastical imperium through analysing a pamphlet debate about Julian the Apostate and Church-state relations in the fourth-century Roman empire. In 1682 an Anglican cleric, Samuel Johnson, printed an account of Julian's reign that argued that the primitive Christians had resisted the emperor's persecutory policies and that Johnson's contemporaries should adopt the same stance towards the Catholic heir presumptive, James, duke of York. Surveying the reaction to Johnson, this article probes the ability of Anglican royalists to map fourth-century Roman onto seventeenth-century English imperium, their assertions about how Christians should respond to an apostate monarch, and whether these authors fulfilled such claims when James came to the throne. It also considers their negotiation of the question of whether miracles existed in the fourth-century imperial Church. It concludes that, despite Rome's territorial dimensions, imperium remained a fundamentally legal-constitutional concept in this period, and that the debate over Julian highlights the fundamentally tense and ambivalent relationship between Church and empire.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2018
References
1 Van Dam, Raymond, ‘The Many Conversions of the Emperor Constantine’, in Mills, Kenneth and Grafton, Anthony, eds, Conversion in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Rochester, NY, 2003), 127–51.Google Scholar
2 Marvell, Andrew, The Rehearsal Transpros'd and the Rehearsal Transpros'd the Second Part, ed. Smith, D. I. B. (Oxford, 1971), 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On this tradition, see also Poole, William, ‘John Milton and the Beard-Hater: Encounters with Julian the Apostate’, Seventeenth Century 31 (2016), 161–89Google Scholar.
3 ‘Anthropopolita, Philaretus’, Some Seasonable Remarks upon the Deplorable Fall of the Emperour Julian (London, 1681)Google Scholar.
4 It is mentioned briefly by Poole, ‘Milton and the Beard-Hater’, 172, see also 167–8; but otherwise the essential article is that by Melinda Zook (n. 9 below).
5 Quantin, Jean-Louis, The Church of England and Christian Antiquity (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar.
6 Bowersock, G. W., Julian the Apostate (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Gleason, Maud W., ‘Festive Satire: Julian's Misopogon and the New Year at Antioch’, JRS 76 (1986), 106–19Google Scholar.
7 It is a later addition to Theodoret's ecclesiastical history: ODCC, s.n. ‘Julian the Apostate’.
8 On the plentiful sources for the reign, see Bowersock, Julian, ch. 1; on the early modern tradition, see Poole, ‘Milton and the Beard-Hater’. Bennet, John, Constantius the Apostate (London, 1683)Google Scholar, included a list of sources.
9 Johnson, Samuel, Julian the Apostate (London, 1682)Google Scholar. Johnson's career is surveyed in Zook, Melinda, ‘Early Whig Ideology, Ancient Constitutionalism, and the Reverend Samuel Johnson’, JBS 32 (1993), 139–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; but beyond listing the responses and correctly identifying George Hickes's Jovian (London, 1683) as pre-eminent, she does not discuss the debate in detail.
10 Oxford, Bodl., MS Wood F.47, fol. 407r (the note ‘AA34’ referred to in Anthony Wood, Life and Times, ed. Andrew Clark, 5 vols [Oxford, 1891–1900], 3: 18–19); see also MS Wood F.47, fol. 629r; ibid., fol. 627v is the note ‘FF43’ referred to in Wood's Life.
11 Pelling, Edward, The Apostate Protestant (London, 1685), 42Google Scholar; Hickes, Jovian, 238; idem, A Sermon Preached … at Bow Church on the 30th of January (London, 1682); see Rose, Jacqueline, ‘Robert Brady's Intellectual History and Royalist Antipopery in Restoration England’, EHR 122 (2007), 1287–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Hickes, Jovian, 83, 208; Northleigh, John, The Triumph of our Monarchy (London, 1685), 15Google Scholar; Anon., The Life of Boetius Recommended to the Author of the Life of Julian (London, 1683), 31–2; Long, Thomas, A Vindication of the Primitive Christians (London, 1683)Google Scholar, sig. B3r, p. 386; Dryden, John and Tate, Nahum, The Second Part of Absalom and Achitophel, in deForest Lord, George, ed., Poems on Affairs of State, 7 vols (New Haven, CT, 1963–75), 3Google Scholar: ll. 352–99.
13 Nahum Tate, ‘Old England’, in Lord, ed., Poems, 3: ll. 21–2.
14 Hickes, Jovian, 204–17, 239–40, 243–4, 269, 193.
15 Meredith, Edward, Some Remarques upon a Late Popular Piece of Nonsense (London, 1682), 4Google Scholar.
16 Hickes, Jovian, 85–6, 90–1; Bennet, Constantius, 40–2.
17 Dowell, John, The Triumph of Christianity (London, 1683), 159–61Google Scholar, 164–5, 176.
18 Long, Vindication, 173, 296–8.
19 Meredith, Remarques, 27–32; Northleigh, Triumph, 456–8, 450.
20 Johnson, Julian's Arts, 170, iii, 84, 164–5, 170–86; Howard, Robert, A Letter to Mr Samuel Johnson (London, 1692), 4Google Scholar.
21 Johnson, Julian's Arts, 188–90, 197; Anon., Letter of Remarkes, 9–11; the latter was attributed to William Atwood by Hopkins, William, Animadversions on Mr Johnson's Answer to Jovian (London, 1681)Google Scholar, sigs a2r–v, and to the Earl of Anglesey by Wood, Anthony A., Athenae Oxonienses: An Exact History of all the Writers and Bishops who have had their Education in the University of Oxford, ed. Bliss, Philip, 4 vols, 3rd edn (London, 1813–20), 4Google Scholar: col. 185.
22 Parker, Samuel, Religion and Loyalty, 2 vols (London, 1684–5), 1Google Scholar: 142–3 (§19); Dowell, Triumph, 163.
23 Howard, Sir Robert, The History of the Reigns of Edward and Richard II (London, 1690)Google Scholar, preface, xi; Anon., The Account of the Life of Julian the Apostate Vindicated (London, 1682), 32.
24 Bennet, Constantius, 15–17; Long, Vindication, ch. 3. On the army, see Hickes, Jovian, 170–2; Pelling, Apostate Protestant, 42–3; Parker, Religion and Loyalty, 2: 2.
25 Hopkins, Animadversions, 16; Hickes, Jovian, 127; Bennet, Constantius, sig. [A6]r; Long, Vindication, 8, 63.
26 Long, Vindication, 74. Hickes dismissed Marius as an Arian: Jovian, 107–9.
27 Bennet, Constantius; Long, Vindication, sig. B3v; Dowell, Triumph, 167; Hickes, Jovian, 162.
28 Hickes, Jovian, 115–21, sig. A8v; Hopkins, Animadversions, 107–9; Long, Vindication, 78–81; cf. Bennet, Constantius, 24.
29 Parker, Religion and Loyalty, 2: 29.
30 Hickes, Jovian, 96, 106–7 (the reference to opposition to Nebuchadnezzar is to Dan. 3: 16–18); Colclough, David, Freedom of Speech in Early Stuart England (Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar, ch. 1.
31 Parker, Religion and Loyalty, especially vol. 1, pt I.
32 Brown, Peter, Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity (Madison, WI, 1992), 67–8Google Scholar.
33 Long, Vindication, 158–64.
34 13 Car. II c.1.
35 In the 1650s, John Evelyn stated that Oliver Cromwell ‘imitated the Apostate Julian’ when the Protector banned Anglicans from teaching: Evelyn, John, Diary, ed. de Beer, Esmond S., 6 vols (Oxford, 1955), 3Google Scholar: 163.
36 Morley Registratius, Ri. and Wickham Legg, J., ‘The Degradation in 1686 of the Rev. Samuel Johnson’, EHR 29 (1914), 723–42Google Scholar.
37 Northleigh, Triumph, sig. C3r.
38 Andrew M. Coleby, ‘Northleigh, John (1656/7–1705)’, ODNB, online edn (2004), at: <http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/20331>, accessed 26 May 2016.
39 Goldie, Mark, ‘The Political Thought of the Anglican Revolution’, in Beddard, R. A., ed., The Revolutions of 1688 (Oxford, 1991), 102–36Google Scholar.
40 Theodor Harmsen, ‘Hickes, George (1642–1715)’, ODNB, online edn (January 2008), at: <http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/13203>, accessed 26 May 2016; Hickes, George, An Apologetical Vindication of the Church of England (London, 1687)Google Scholar.
41 Kenrick, Daniel, A Sermon Preached at the Cathedral-Church of Worcester at the Lent-Assize, April 7th 1688 (London, 1688), 9Google Scholar, [20–1], 29.
42 ‘Hickes’, ODNB.
43 Johnson, Julian's Arts (printed in 1683 but hidden from the government: see CSPD, Jan.-Aug. 1683, 336); Grey, Anchitell, Debates of the Honourable House of Commons, 10 vols (London, 1763), 9Google Scholar: 288–9; Howard, History, preface.
44 Hopkins, Animadversions, 6–7, 77, 101; Howard, Letter.
45 Dowell, Triumph, 66.
46 Long, Vindication, 365, 112.
47 Dowell, Triumph, 25, 98, 90–6; cf. Augustine, City of God 5.21.
48 Dowell, Triumph, 47–9.
49 Ibid. 43–4; compare his earlier critical stance in The Clergies Honour (London, 1681), 60–1. Ironically, the episode had been cited by Johnson (Julian, 47–8) and his supporters (Anon., Account of the Life, 29); cf. Meredith, Remarques, 23. It comes from Tyrannius Rufinus's continuation of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, 1.36: Tyrannii Rufini, Opera Omnia, PL 21, col. 504.
50 Dowell, Triumph, 101–17, 122–3; see also his The Leviathan Heretical (Oxford, 1683). By defending, in Leviathan, ch. 42, Naaman's concealing his true belief and bowing to the idol in the house of Rimmon (2 Kings 5: 17–19), Hobbes endorsed the idea that one could legitimately hide one's faith. Nicodemus was the disciple who came to Jesus in the night (John 3: 2); Nicodemism, a timid or hidden Christianity.
51 Shaw, Jane, Miracles in Enlightenment England (New Haven, CT, 2006), 2–3Google Scholar, chs. 2, 7; see also Walsham, Alexandra, ‘Miracles in Post-Reformation England’, in Cooper, Kate and Gregory, Jeremy, eds, Signs, Wonders, Miracles: Representations of Divine Power in the Life of the Church, SCH 41 (Woodbridge, 2005), 273–306Google Scholar, especially 286–7.
52 Warburton, William, Julian, or a Discourse concerning the Earthquake and Firey Eruption, 2nd edn (London, 1751)Google Scholar.
53 Cartwright, Thomas, A Sermon Preached upon the Anniversary Solemnity of the Happy Inauguration of our Dread Soveraign Lord King James II: In the Collegiate Church of Ripon, February the 6th. 1685/6 (London, 1686), 15Google Scholar.