No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mary and the Middle Ages: From Diversity to Discipline
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
For just over a thousand years the Virgin Mary was central to any attempt to defend or explain Christian Orthodoxy. From the formulations at Ephesos and Chalcedon Mary formed part of the understanding of a God made Flesh and of a picture of redemption which was all-embracing in its promise and tantalizing in its accessibility. This essay shows just how wide and diverse were the medieval ways of thinking about Mary and the ways of exploring the possibilities inherent in the figure of the Mother of God. In liturgy and prayer, in homilies and devotional poetry, in a vast array of material forms Mary was made familiar, above all as mother, as intercessor and companion. Unlike the sacraments, among them the all-important Eucharist, Mary was rarely a subject of discipline or of scrutiny; she entered people’s lives early and seemingly effectively. She stood, however, as a boundary-marker of Christian identity, the quintessential barrier between Christians and Others. Mary did become a subject of discipline to people in the lands of conquest and disease outside Europe.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007
References
1 Brown, Peter, Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianisation of the Roman World (Cambridge, 1995), 3.Google Scholar
2 Cameron, Averil, Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: the Development of Christian Discourse (Berkeley, CA, 1991), 104.Google Scholar
3 Foskett, Mary F., A Virgin Conceived: Mary and Classical Representations of Virginity (Bloomington, IN, 2002), 141–64.Google Scholar
4 Green, Arthur, ‘Shekhinah, the Virgin Mary, and the Song of Songs: Reflections on a Kabbalistic Symbol in its Historical Context’, American Jewish Studies Review 26 (2002), 1–52 Google Scholar; Schäfer, Peter, ‘Daughter, Sister, Bride, and Mother Images of the Femininity of God in the Early Kabbala’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 68 (2000), 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Tanner, Norman P., ed., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols (London, 1990), 1: 5–5*.Google Scholar
6 Ibid., 24–24*.
7 Boeft, Jan den, ‘Propaganda in the Cult of Isis’, in Horst, Pieter W. van der, Menken, Maarten J. J., Smit, Joop F. M. and Oyen, Geert van, eds, Persuasion and Dissuasion in Early Christianity, Ancient Judaism, and Hellenism (Leuven, 2003), 9–23.Google Scholar
8 Cooper, Kate, ‘Empress and Theotokos: Gender and Patronage in the Christological Controversy’, in Swanson, R. N., ed., The Church and Mary, SCH 39 (Woodbridge, 2004), 39–51 Google Scholar; eadem, , ‘Contesting the Nativity: Wives, Virgins, and Pulcheria’s imitado Mariae ’, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 19 (1998), 31–43.Google Scholar
9 Cooper, Kate, The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity (Cambridge, MA, 1996)Google Scholar; Chazelle, Celia M., The Crucified God in the Carolingian Era: Theology and An of Christ’s Passion (Cambridge, 2001), 56–9, 242–58, 268–9 Google Scholar; Mayr-Harting, Henry, Ottoman Book Illumination: an Historical Study (2nd edn, London, 1999), 139–56 Google Scholar; Clayton, Mary, The Cult of the Virgin Mary in Anglo-Saxon England (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
10 De sancta Maria, PL 88, 265.
11 De virginitate, PL 88, 266–76.
12 The Non-Dramatic Works of Hrosvitha: Text, Translation, and Commentary, ed. Wiegand, Gonsalva (Saint Louis, MI, 1936).Google Scholar
13 For a discussion of Fulbert’s work, see Fassler, Margot, ‘Mary’s Nativity, Fulbert of Chartres, and the Stirps Jesse: Liturgical Innovation circa 1000 and its Afterlife’, Speculum 75 (2000), 389–434, at 402–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 On monastic and clerical sensibilities around the year 1000, see Fulton, Rachel, From Judgement to Passion: Devotion to Christ and ¡he Virgin Mary, 800–1200 (New York, 2003).Google Scholar
15 Anima mea: prières privées et textes de dévotion du Moyen Âge latin; Autour des Prières ou Méditations attribuées à saint Anselme de Cantorbéry (XIe-XIIe siècle), ed. and French trans. Cottier, Jean-François (Turnhout, 2001), 114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, lines 7–9. English translations are my own.
16 Ibid., 230, lines 1–3.
17 Ibid., lines 12–14.
18 Tractatus de conceptione sanctae Mariae, ed. Thurston, Herbert and Slater, Thomas (Freiburg-in-Breisgau, 1904), 11.Google Scholar
19 The Letters of St Bernard of Clairvaux, trans. James, Bruno Scott (London, 1953), letter no. 215, 289–93, at 289 Google Scholar; for the Latin, see Sancti Bernardi opera VII, ed. Leclercq, Jean and Rochais, H. (Rome, 1974), 388–92.Google Scholar
20 On the Song of Songs, trans. Walsh, Kilian and Edwards, Irene M., Cistercian Fathers Series 31 (Kalamazoo, 1979)Google Scholar; for the Latin, see Sancti, Bernardi opera I—II, ed. Leclercq, J., Talbot, C. H., and Rochais, H. M. (Rome, 1957).Google Scholar
21 Commentaria in Canticum canticorum, ed. and trans. Deutz, Helmut and Deutz, Use, Fontes Christiani 70, 2 vols (Tumhout, 2005).Google Scholar
22 Christiansen, Eric, The Northern Crusades (2nd edn, Harmondsworth, 1997), 221.Google Scholar
23 For an example from late fourteenth-century Paris, see Musée national du Moyen Age (Paris, 2003), 58 Google Scholar, plate 71.
24 Die Sammlung von Meisterliedem in der Heidelberger Handschrift cpg 680: Edition und Kommentar, ed. Wunderle, Elisabeth (Göppingen, 1993), no. 22.Google Scholar
25 For Frauenlob, see Newman, Barbara, Frauenlob’s Song of Songs: a Medieval German Poet and His Masterpiece (University Park, PA, 2006), 23, 25, 188–97.Google Scholar
26 Gerson, Jean, Oeuvre completes VII, ed. Glorieux, Palémon (Paris, 1968), no. 385, 948–67, at 963 Google Scholar. On the critique of Trintarian image making, see Mills, Robert, ‘Jesus as Monster’, in Bildhauer, Bettina and Mills, Robert, eds, The Monstrous Middle Ages (Cardiff, 2003), 28–54, at 45–6.Google Scholar
27 Os, Henk van, The Way to Heaven: Relic Veneration in the Middle Ages (Amsterdam, 2000), 123–4 Google Scholar and colour image on 125.
28 Musée national du moyen age, 106–7; also van Os, Way to Heaven, 40 and image on 39.
29 Os, Van, Way to Heaven, 129 Google Scholar, figure 156.
30 The Treasures of the Cracow Monasteries, ed. Nowak, Janusz Tadeusz and Turdza, Witold (Cracow, 2000), 29.Google Scholar
31 Antwerp Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten c. 1450; and second wing in Berlin Staatliche Museen.
32 Winston, Anne, ‘Tracing the Origins of the Rosary: German Vernacular Texts’, Speculum 68 (1993), 619–36, at 624–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Klapper, Joseph, ‘Mitteldeutsche Texte aus Breslauer Handschriften’, Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 48 (1918), 83–98 Google Scholar, esp. 83–7; cited 83, 85.
34 Winston, , ‘Tracing the Origins of the Rosary’, 622.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 625–7. For more details about precedents to the rosary, see Winston-Allen, Anne, Stories of the Rose: the Making of the Rosary in the Middle Ages (University Park, PA, 1997)Google Scholar, ch. 1.
36 Winston, , ‘Tracing the Origins of the Rosary’, 627–31.Google Scholar
37 Schmitt, Jean-Claude, ‘La confrérie du rosaire de Colmar (1485): textes de fondation, “exempla” en allemande d’Alain de la Roche, listes des prêcheurs et des sæurs dominicaines’, Archivum fratrum praedicatorum 40 (1970), 97–124, at 106.Google Scholar
38 For a colour reproduction, see Clifton, James, ed., The Body of Christ in the Art of Europe and New Spain 1150–1800 (Munich and New York, 1997), no. 65, 142–3.Google Scholar
39 On the image and this tract, see Zalewska, Katarzyna, ‘ Corona beatissimae Virginis Mariae: Das mittelalteriche gemalte Marientraktat aus der Bernhardinerkirche in Breslau’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 55 (1992), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Marrow, James H., Passion Iconography in Northern European Art of the Late Middle Ages and Early Renaissance: a Study of the Transformation of Sacred Metaphor into Descriptive Narrative (Courtrai, 1979).Google Scholar
41 Mecham, June L., ‘Reading between the Lines: Compilation, Variation, and the Recovery of an Authentic Female Voice in the Dornenkron Prayer Books from Wienhausen’, Journal of Medieval History 29 (2003), 109–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I am grateful to Professor Mecham for enlight ening conversations and exchanges on this most interesting text.
42 Wei, Ian P., ‘Guy de l’Aumône’s Summa de diversis questionibus theologie ’, Traditio 46 (1988), 275–323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 281. I am extremely grateful to Ian Wei for sharing with me so generously his erudition on quodlibetal questions and Paris theology in general, and for pointing me to the relevant bibliography.
43 Boyle, Leonard E., ‘The Quodlibets of St. Thomas and Pastoral Care’, The Thomist 38 (1974), 232–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glorieux, Palemón, La littérature quodlibétique de 1260 à 1320, 2 vols (Paris, 1925 and 1935)Google Scholar; Glorieux, Palemón, ‘L’enseignement au moyen âge: techniques et méthodes en usage à la faculté de théologie de Paris au xiiiesiècle’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyenãge 35 (1968), 65–186, at 128–34 Google Scholar
44 Translation, together with instructive comments, is offered in Belduc, Michelle, ‘The Poetics of Authorship and Vernacular Religious Devotion’, in Nunn, Susan Karrant, ed., Varieties of Devotion in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Turnhout, 2003), 125–43, at 131–5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; citation from 133–4.
45 Alighieri, Dante, La divina commedia, ed. Salvo, Tommaso di, 3 vols (Bologna, 1987), 3: 594 Google Scholar; English translation Alighieri, Dante, The Divine Comedy, trans. Sisson, C. H. (Oxford, 1993), 490.Google Scholar
46 Peltomaa, Leena Mari, The Image of the Virgin Mary in the Akathistos Hymn (Leiden, 2001), 21.Google Scholar
47 Brading, David, Mexican Phoenix: Our Lady of Guadalupe; Image and Tradition 1531–2000 (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar. A summary of Brading, ’s argument is offered in ‘Divine Idea and “Our Mother”: Elite and Popular Understanding in the Cult of Our Lady of Guadalupe of Mexico’, in Cooper, K. and Gregory, J., eds, Elite and Popular Religion, SCH 42 (Woodbridge, 2006), 240–60.Google Scholar