Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:27:40.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literature and Church Discipline in Early Modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Nigel Smith
Nigel Smith*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That English literature is suffused with religion is news to no one; the English language is throughout history part of the structure of the Church or churches. But there is a way in which Church history and English literature have been missing each other for a good many years. This is in part because, until recently, religion in literature has been the preserve of relatively small groups of enthusiasts with partisan views. Their work has appeared unattractive or irrelevant to a largely secular mainstream that has been preoccupied with the ‘political’ (as opposed to the religious) in early modern literary studies (this is especially so with regard to the drama). But we now have an account of Church history that is more sophisticated and variegated, more attuned to confessional variety and its politics, local and national. This is crying out for engagement with literary studies in ways that literary scholars would find compelling, not least in offering many solutions to the kinds of questions they have come to ask. To some extent the dialogue has already begun, and indeed several exemplary studies are cited in what follows. Nonetheless, we are at the beginning of what may well be a long and extremely fruitful interdisciplinary encounter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 43: Discipline and Diversity , 2007 , pp. 317 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For two benchmark publications of this kind, see Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan, eds, Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism (London and Ithaca, NY, 1985; 2nd edn, 1994)Google Scholar; Drakakis, John, ed., Alternative Shakespeares (London and New York, 1985).Google Scholar

2 Knapp, Jeffrey, Shakespeare’s Tribe: Church, Nation, and Theater in Renaissance England (Chicago, IL 2002).Google Scholar

3 See, e.g., Parker, John, The Aesthetics of Antichrist: from Christian Drama to Christopher Marlowe (Ithaca, 2007 forthcoming).Google Scholar

4 Perkins, William, A declaration of the true maner of knowing Christ crucified (London, 1596), 33 Google Scholar. See also his Two Treatises: of the nature and practise of Repentance: of the combat of flesh and spirit (London, 1597).Google Scholar

5 See Waldron, Jennifer, ‘Eloquence of the Body: Aesthetics, Theology, and English Renaissance Theater’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2004.Google Scholar

6 Pritchard, Allan, ‘Puritans and the Blackfriars Theater: the Cases of Mistresses Duck and Drake’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 45: 1 (1994), 92–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Another topic that has returned with much interest: see most recently Asquith, Clare, Shadowplay: the Hidden Beliefs and Coded Politics of William Shakespeare (New York, 2005).Google Scholar

8 Waldron, , ‘Eloquence of the Body’, 5.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., 6.

10 Gosson, Stephen, Playes confuted inftue actions: prouing that they are not to be suffred in a Christian common weale, by the waye both the cauils of Thomas Lodge, and the play of playes, written in their defence, and other obiections of players frendes, are truely set downe and directlye aunsweared (London, 1582)Google Scholar; also available in two modern editions, ed. Freeman, Arthur (New York, 1972), ed. Davison, Peter (New York, 1972).Google Scholar

11 Hunt, Arnold, ‘The Lord’s Supper in Early Modern England’, P&P 161 (1998), 39–83.Google Scholar

12 For the religious politics of Measure for Measure and its context, see now Lupton, Julia, Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology (Chicago, IL, 2005)Google Scholar, ch. 5; Shuger, Debra, Political Theologies in Shakespeare’s England: the Sacred and the State in ‘Measure for Measure’ (Basingstoke and New York, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Nigel, The Two Economies of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure ’, English 36(1987), 197–232.Google Scholar

13 Peter Lake with Questier, Michael, The Anti-Christ’s Lewd Hat: Protestants, Papists and Players in Post-Reformation England (New Haven, CT, 2002)Google Scholar. Forthcoming work on the history plays and Hamlet.

14 Hunt, , ‘Lord’s Supper’, 54–6.Google Scholar

15 One interpretation among very many here in this tradition would be Wall, John N., Transformations of the Word: Spenser, Herbert, Vaughan (Athens, GA, 1988)Google Scholar. The point in respect of studies of the seventeenth-century religious lyric in particular is that literary scholarship and the new Church history referred to in this essay have yet to connect.

16 Wilcox, Helen, ‘Something Understood: the Reputation and Influence of George Herbert to 1715’, unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1984 Google Scholar; Smith, Nigel, ‘George Herbert in Defence of Antinomianism’, Notes and Queries, ns 31 (1984), 334–5 Google Scholar; Achinstein, Sharon, Literature and Dissent in Milton’s England (Cambridge, 2003), 200–8.Google Scholar

17 The classic general case is made by Kolakowski, Keszek, Chrétiens sans église: la conscience religeuse et le lien confessionnel au XVIIesiècle (Paris, 1969)Google Scholar, and elaborated variously in different particular areas: see for instance Lewalski, Barbara K., Protestant Poetics and the Seven teenth-Century Religious Lyric (Princeton, NJ, 1979)Google Scholar, Pt I.

18 See Smith, Nigel, ‘Elegy for a Grindletonian: Poetry and Heresy in Northern England, 1615–1640’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33: 2 (2003), 335–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and more generally Como, David, Blown by the Spirit: Puritanism and the Emergence of an Antinomian Underground in Pre-Civil-War England (Stanford, CA, 2004).Google Scholar

19 Aglin, William, ‘Heare followeth certaine vearses made upon the death of this afore said Author Roger Breietley: by William Aglin: minister’, in London, Lambeth Palace Library, MS 3461, 230.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 238.

21 Green, Ian, The Christian’s ABC: Catechism and Catechizing in England c.1530-1740 (Oxford, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Print and Protestantism in Early Modern England (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar

22 I have benefited greatly from consulting Sarah Mortimer’s impressive ‘Refuting Satan: Owen, Socinianism and the Interpretation of Scripture’, unpublished M.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 2003. I have discussed these issues further in Smith, Nigel, ‘ “And if God was one of us”: John Biddle and Socinianism in Seventeenth-Century England’, in Loewenstein, David and Marshall, John, eds, Heresy, Literature and Politics in Early Modern English Culture (Cambridge, 2007), 160–84.Google Scholar

23 Biddle, John, A Brief Scripture-Catechism for Children (London, 1654), 19.Google ScholarPubMed

24 See further, Williams, George Hunston, ed., The Polish Brethren: Documentation of the History and Thought of Unitarianism in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and in the Diaspora 1601–1685 (Missoula, MO, 1980).Google Scholar

25 For the lives of Best and Biddle, see Stephen D. Snobelen, ‘Best, Paul (1590–1657)’, ODNB [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/2291], and idem, ‘Biddle, John (1615/16-1662)’ [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/2361 [accessed 24 Jan 2007].

26 John Biddle, Preface to second edition of A Confession of Faith touching the Holy Trinity in The Apostolical and True Opinion concerning the Holy Trinity (1653), BL, Thomason Tracts E1479(1), sig. [D51:].

27 See Nye, Stephen, A brief history of the Unitarians, called also Socinians in four letters, written to a friend (London, 1687), 31 Google Scholar, where Erasmus is cited defending the Arians.

28 Biddle, , A Confession of Faith (2nd edn, London, 1653), 38.Google Scholar

29 Biddle, , Scripture-Catechism, 5.Google Scholar

30 See Rogers, John, ‘Milton and the Heretical Priesthood of Christ’, in Loewenstein, David and Marshall, John, eds, Heresy, Literature and Politics, 203–20.Google Scholar

31 See Toland, John, Amyntor, or, A defence of Milton’s life (London, 1699)Google Scholar; idem, Clito; a poem on the force of eloquence (London, 1700)Google Scholar. On the history of Paradise Lost’s reception, see Zwierlein, Anne-Julia, Majestick Milton: British Imperial Expansion and Transformations of ‘Paradise Lost’, 1667–1837 (Münster, 2001).Google Scholar

32 And as extensively discussed in Stachniewski, John, The Persecutory Imagination: English Puritanism and the Literature of Religious Despair (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar, Pt I.