Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T21:51:34.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disciplined Disobedience? Women and the Survival of Catholicism in the North York Moors in the Reign of Elizabeth I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Emma Watson*
Affiliation:
University of York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The history of post-Reformation Catholicism in Yorkshire can be divided into two distinct periods: pre- and post-1570. Only in the aftermath of the 1569 Northern Rebellion did the Elizabethan government begin to implement fully the 1559 religious settlement in the north, and to take firm action against those who persistently flouted religious laws by continuing to practise the traditional religion of their forefathers. In the Northern Province, serious efforts to enforce conformity and to evangelize did not begin until the arrival of Edmund Grindal as Archbishop of York in 1571. He was joined a year later by the Puritan sympathizer Henry Hastings, Earl of Huntingdon, as President of the Council of the North and together they spear-headed the region’s first real evangelical challenge to traditional religion. 1571 also saw the enactment of the first real penal law against Catholics, although only in 15 81 was the term ‘recusant’ coined. Grindal and Huntingdon formed a powerful team committed to Protestant evangelization and the eradication of Catholicism in the North, however, in Yorkshire, their mission was not entirely successful. The North Riding consistently returned high numbers of recusants in the Elizabethan period, and was home to some well-established Catholic communities. In the West and East Ridings recusancy was not so widespread, although religious conservatism persisted, and Catholicism remained a much more significant force across Yorkshire than elsewhere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007

References

1 Aveling, Hugh, Northern Catholics (London, 1966)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Post Reformation Catholicism in East Yorkshire 1558–1790’, East Yorkshire Local History Society 11 (1960), 531 Google Scholar; idem, , ‘The Catholic Recusants of the West Riding of Yorkshire 1558–1790’, Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society: Literary and Historical Section, vol. 10, pt 6 (Leeds, 1963), 191229.Google Scholar

2 Ibid; and also Beckinsale, B. W., ‘The Characteristics of the Tudor North’, Northern History 4 (1969), 718 Google Scholar; Cliffe, J. T., Yorkshire Gentry from the Reformation to the Civil War, University of London Historical Studies 25 (London, 1969), 169.Google Scholar

3 Haigh, C., English Reformations (Oxford, 1993), 266.Google Scholar

4 Watson, Emma, ‘ “A stiff-necked, wilful and obstinate people”: the Catholic Laity in the North York Moors c.1559-1603’, Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 77 (2005), 181204.Google Scholar

5 See, for example, Crawford, Patricia, Women and Religion in England 1300–1700 (London, 1993)Google Scholar; Rowlands, Marie, ‘Recusant Women 1560–1640’, in Prior, Mary, ed., Women in English Society 1500–1800 (London, 1985), 14975.Google Scholar

6 Bastow, Sarah, ‘ “Worth Nothing but Very Wilful”: Catholic Recusant Women of Yorkshire 1536–1642’, Recusant History 25 (2001), 591603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Aveling, , Northern Catholics, 147.Google Scholar

8 Shells, W. J., ‘Household, Age and Gender among Jacobean Yorkshire Recusants’, in Rowlands, Marie B., ed., English Catholics of Parish and Town 1558–1788, Catholic Record Society Publications, Monograph 5 (London, 1999) [hereafter: CRSP], 13152 Google Scholar, suggested this for the early seventeenth century, but the same can be argued for the later sixteenth.

9 Duffy, Eamon, Voices of Morebath: Reformation and Rebellion in an English Village, (New Haven, CT, 2001), 1701.Google Scholar

10 Binns, Jack, ‘Sir Hugh Cholmley of Whitby 1600–1657: His Life and Works’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, 1990, 50.Google Scholar

11 York, Borthwick Institute [hereafter: Borthwick], V1 582, fol. 234r. Jane Burton is not named in 1582, only listed as Robert’s wife, but she appears repeatedly under her own name in subsequent visitation returns.

12 Recusant Roll 1 (1592-1593), ed. Calthrop, M. M. C., CRSP 18 (1916), 84102 Google Scholar; Recusant Roll 2 (1593-1594), ed. Bowler, Hugh, CRSP 57 (1965), 199222 Google Scholar; Recusant Roll 3 (1594-1595) and Recusant Roll 4 (1595-1596), ed. Bowler, Hugh, CRSP 61 (1970), 11327, 24555 Google Scholar; Peacock, Edward, A List of the Roman Catholics in the County of York in 1604 (London, 1872), 89110.Google Scholar

13 Aveling, , Northern Catholics, 956.Google Scholar

14 Green, M. A. E., Calendar of State Papers Domestic, Elizabeth 1591–1594 (London, 1867), 305 Google Scholar. George Tocketts does not appear in any visitation returns.

15 See Cartwright, J. J., Chapters in the History of Yorkshire (Wakefield, 1872), 6672 Google Scholar for Gargrave’s list.

16 Aveling, , Northern Catholics, 160 Google Scholar; Shells, W.J., ‘Catholics and their Neighbours in a Rural Community: Egton Chapelry 1590–1780, Northern History 34(1998), 10933, at 111.Google Scholar

17 Hollings, Alice, Goathland: the Story of a Moorland Village (Whitby, 1971), 16 Google Scholar; York, Borthwick, V 1595–6 (CB3), fol. 145v; V1600 (CB.1B), fol. 23 iv.

18 York, Borthwick, V1586, fol. nor, V1590-1/CB1, fol. 199r;-, V1594, fol. 133r;, V1595-6/CB3, fol. 148r;, V1600/CB.1B, fol. 233v.

19 journal Sheils, , ‘Catholics and their Neighbours’, 115, 119.Google Scholar

20 Green, , CSPD 1591–1594, 305.Google Scholar

21 Moody, Joanna, The Private Life of an Elizabethan Lady: the Diary of Lady Margaret Hoby 1599–1605 (Stroud, 2001).Google Scholar

22 Crawford, , Women and Religion, 7580.Google Scholar

23 Foreign education became illegal from 1585 and there was a danger that heirs might renounce their rights for the priesthood. However some Catholics, such as the Meynells of North Kilvington, still ensured that their children received a Catholic education. Aveling, Hugh, ed., ‘Recusancy Papers of the Meynell Family’, CRSP 56 (London, 1964), xv, xvii Google Scholar. There is only one visitation presentment for the employment of a Catholic schoolmaster: York, Borthwick, Vi 595–6/CB3, fols 148v-149r.

24 Crawford, , Women and Religion, 61.Google Scholar

25 Newman, Christine, ‘The Role of Women in Early Yorkshire Recusancy a Reap praisal’, Northern Catholic History 30 (1989), 616, at 10.Google Scholar

26 York, Borthwick, V1594, fols 133r, 136V; V1586, fol. 120r, V1590-1/CB1, fol. 199V; V1595-6/CB3, fols 148r, 150r; V1600/CB.1B, fols 233v, 234r, 237r, 242r, 248v.

27 York, Borthwick, V1586, fol. 108v; V1590-1/CB1, fols 164r, 184r; V1594, fol. 139r; V1595-6/CB3, fol. 153v; V1600/CB.1B, fol. 235v.

28 Binns, , Cholmley, 42, 44, 48 Google Scholar; Rowlands, , ‘Recusant Women’, 154.Google Scholar

29 Aveling, , Northern Catholics, 149.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., 130; Bossy, John, The English Catholic Community (London, 1975), 136 Google Scholar; Crawford, , Women and Religion, 61.Google Scholar

31 Dickens, A. G., ‘The Extent and Character of Recusancy in Yorkshire, 1604’, Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 37 (1948–51), 2449, at 25.Google Scholar

32 Patrouch, Joseph, A Negotiated Settlement: the Counter-Reformation in Upper Austria under the Habsburgs (Boston, 2000)Google Scholar is a good illustration of the way in which local landowners could be used to aid authorities in implementing religious change, and of the resistance they could offer.

33 York, Borthwick, Prob. Reg. 26, fol. 321v.

34 York, Borthwick, Prob. Reg. 28, fols 590v-501r.

35 York, Borthwick, V1590-1/CB1 fol. 190r; Fylingdales and Lythe each returned 40 female recusants in the Elizabethan visitations.

36 York,Borthwick, Prob. Reg. 18, fols ioivand 183r;PR 19, fol. 351v, PR21, fol. 316r.

37 York, Borthwick, Prob. Reg. 27, fols 460v-461r.

38 Bastow, , ‘ “Worth Nothing but Very Wilful”’, 599.Google Scholar