Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:46:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dangers of Diversity: Heresy and Authority in the 1405 Case of John Edward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Ian Forrest
Ian Forrest*
Affiliation:
Oriel College, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When John Edward of Brington in Northamptonshire abjured heresy in the ‘Greneyerd’ of Norwich cathedral close on Palm Sunday 1405, he was presented to the gathered crowds as a living example of the dangers of diversity in the Christian faith. Because heresy was feared as a fundamental challenge to doctrine, authority, and social harmony, the agents of Church and crown went to great lengths in the period between 1382 and the Reformation to advertise its depravity and illegality. The anti-heresy message was not, however, a simple one, and the judicial performances that constitute the Church’s propaganda campaign on this issue sometimes used highly equivocal rhetoric and images. In these performances heresy was capable of being represented as a minority sectarian problem, or one diffused throughout society. In truth it was both, and so the anti-heresy message had to encompass much more nuance than one might imagine. This essay focuses on the campaign against the lollards in late medieval England, in particular John Edward’s staged abjuration, which is recorded in a letter sent by the presiding bishop, Henry Despenser, to his archbishop, Thomas Arundel. This certification presents a compelling tableau vivant encompassing the penitent, the crowds, and the authorities of Church, crown, and city. In their efforts to stage-manage the abjuration of heresy, however, these authorities had not only to navigate the complexity of anti-heretical rhetoric and present it to a large audience, but, perhaps more importantly, had to overcome considerable rancour and division within their own ranks, to present a unified front against the threat of heresy. For they had to show diat there was a unity from which heretics were deviating. Edward’s abjuration, therefore, offered an important opportunity to demonstrate repentance, and to invite the clergy and people of Norwich to consider the dangers posed by their own tendencies towards disunity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 43: Discipline and Diversity , 2007 , pp. 230 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Edward is mentioned in Hudson, A., ‘Lollardy: the English Heresy?’, in idem, Lollards and their Books (London, 1985), 141–63, at 156 Google ScholarPubMed; Hudson, A., The premature Reformation: Wycliffite Texts and Lollard History (Oxford, 1988), 291, 326.Google Scholar

2 For studies of anti-heresy and inquisition, see Hudson, A., ‘The Examination of Lollards’, in idem, Lollards and their Books, 125–40 Google ScholarPubMed; Aston, M., ‘Bishops and Heresy: the Defence of the Faith’, in idem, Faith and Fire: Popular and Unpopular Religion, 1350–1600 (London, 1993), 73–94 Google Scholar. My recent book The Detection of Heresy in Late Medieval England (Oxford, 2005), discusses anti-lollard rhetoric and legal practice, without going into the detail of the Edward case.

3 London, Lambeth Palace Library, Register of Thomas Arundel, vol. i, fols 390r-v. To avoid repeating identical references, this MS will not be cited again in the notes.

4 Moore, R. I., The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar, famously argues that the prosecution of heresy had as much to do with the Church’s perception of its own unity as it did with its perception of heretics as devi ants. On publicity in the punishment of heretics, see Hamilton, B. H., The Medieval Inquisition (London, 1981), 55 Google Scholar; Bethencourt, F., L’Inquisition à l’epoque moderne: Espagne, Italie, Portugal Xve-XIXesiècle (Paris, 1995), 249.Google Scholar

5 There are good articles by Richard Davies (Despenser) and Simon Walker (Erpingham) in the ODNB.

6 For Tottington, see Greatrex, J., Biographical Register of the English Cathedral Priories of the Province of Canterbury c.1066-1540 (Oxford, 1997), 566 Google Scholar; for Derlyngton, see Emden, A. B., A Biographical Register of the University of Cambridge to 1500 (Cambridge, 1963), 185–6.Google Scholar

7 For legislation on preaching prior to 1405, see Decretales Gregorii IX, 5.7.13 (CIC 2: 787–8; Cambridge University Library, Ely Diocesan Registry, MS G/1/2, fols 41v-42r; London, Lambeth Palace Library, Register of William Courtenay, fol. 26r. For discussion, see Spencer, H. L., English Preaching in the Late Middle Ages (Oxford, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Forrest, , Detection of Heresy, 60–8.Google Scholar

8 This theme is important in Strohm, P., England’s Empty Throne: Usurpation and the Language of Legitimation, 1399–1422 (NewHaven, CT, 1998), 32–62.Google Scholar

9 Aston, M., Thomas Arundel: a Study of Church Life in the Reign of Richard II (Oxford, 1967), 139–40 Google Scholar; Walsingham, Thomas, Historia Anglicana, ed. Riley, H. T., RS, 2 vols (London, 1863–4), 2:7–8.Google Scholar

10 Aston, M., ‘The Impeachment of Bishop Despenser’, BIHR 38 (1965), 128–37, at 147 Google Scholar; Allington-Smith, R., ‘Not a Yorkist but Anti-Lancastrian: Henry Despenser, Bishop of Norwich, 1370–1406’, The Ricardian 10: 124(1994), 16–18.Google Scholar

11 John, T., ‘Sir Thomas Erpingham, East Anglian Society and the Dynastic Revolution of 1399’. Norfolk Archaeology 35 (1970), 96–108, at 100 Google Scholar; Castor, H., The King, the Crown, and the Duchy of Lancaster. Public Authority and Private Power, 1399–1461 (Oxford, 2000), 64 Google Scholar; Calendar of the Patent Rolls Preserved in the Public Record Office (HMSO, 1891-) [hereafter: Patent Rolls] 1399–1401, 274; Patent Rolls 1401–5, 47.

12 Rotuli Parliamentorum, ed. Strachey, J., 6 vols (London, 1767–7), 3: 456–7.Google Scholar

13 Mourin, K., ‘Norwich, Norfolk and Sir Thomas Erpingham’, in Curry, A. ed., Agincourt 1415: Henry V, Sir Thomas Erpingham and the Triumph of the English Archers (Stroud, 2000), 78–90, at 82.Google Scholar

14 Patent Rolls 1401–5, 67, 274; Goodman, A., Margery Kempe and her World (Edinburgh, 2002), 29.Google Scholar

15 John, , ‘Erpingham’, 99.Google Scholar

16 Concilia Magnae Britanniae et Hibemiae, ed. Wilkins, D., 4 vols (London, 1737), 3: 256 Google Scholar; Strohm, , England’s Empty Throne, 40–5.Google Scholar

17 Walsingham, , Historia Anglicana, 2: 188–9 Google Scholar

18 Patent Rolls 1401–5, 128; Walker, S., ‘Rumour, Sedition and Popular Protest in the Reign of Henry IV’, P&P 166 (2000), 59–62.Google Scholar

19 McNiven, P., Heresy and Politics in the Reign of Henry IV: the Burning of John Badby (Woodbridge, 1987), 81–6.Google Scholar

20 Tanner, N. P., The Church in Late Medieval Norwich 1370–1532 (Toronto, 1984), 160 Google Scholar; Harper-Bill, C., ‘The Medieval Church and the Wider World’, in Atherton, I., Fernie, E., Harper-Bill, C., and Smith, H., eds, Norwich Cathedral: Church, City and Diocese (London, 1996), 281–313, at 297–8.Google Scholar

21 Greatrex, , Biographical Register, 470.Google Scholar

22 Calendar of Entries in the Papal Registers Relating to Great Britain and Ireland: Papal Letters (HMSO, 1893-) [hereafter: Papal Letters] 1362–1404, 518, 525.

23 Papal Letters 1396–1404, 11–12, 273–4, 318–19.

24 Ibid., 526–7, 586–7.

25 Greatrex, , Biographical Register, 470.Google Scholar

26 The Records of the City of Norwich, ed. Hudson, W. and Tingey, J. C., 2 vols (Norwich, 1906), 2: 31–3 Google Scholar; McRee, B. R., ‘Peacemaking and its Limits in Late Medieval Norwich’, EHR 109 (1994), 831–66, at 847–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Records of the City of Norwich, 1: 66, 2: 54; Calendar of the Close Rolls Preserved in the Public Record Office: Henry IV, 5 vols (HMSO, 1927–38), 2: 245; John, , ‘Erpingham’, 101.Google Scholar

28 Records of the City of Norwich, 1:81-2.

29 McRee, , ‘Peacemaking’, 851 Google Scholar; Attreed, L., ‘Urban Identity in Medieval English Towns’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 32 (2002), 571–93, at 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Patent Rolls 1401–5, 273; Tanner, , Late Medieval Norwich, 144–5.Google Scholar

31 Aston, M., ‘Were the Lollards a Sect?’, in Biller, P. and Dobson, B., eds, The Medieval Church: Universities, Heresy, and the Religious Life; Essays in Honour of Gordon Leff, SCH.S 11 (Woodbridge, 1999), 163–91 Google Scholar; McSheffrey, S., ‘Heresy, Orthodoxy and English Vernacular Religion 1480–1525’, P&P 186 (2005), 47–80.Google Scholar

32 Forrest, , Detection of Heresy, 143–58.Google Scholar

33 Moore, R. I., ‘Heresy as Disease’, in Lourdaux, D. W. and Verhelst, D., eds, The Concept of Heresy in the Middle Ages (Louvain, 1976), 1–11 Google Scholar; Ormerod, P. and Roach, A. P., The Medieval Inquisition: Scale-Free Networks and the Suppression of Heresy’, Physica A 339 (2004), 645–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Nutton, V., ‘The Seeds of Disease: an Explanation of Contagion and Infection from the Greeks to the Renaissance’, Medical History 27 (1983), 1–34 Google Scholar; The Middle English Translation of Guy de Chauliac’s Treatise on ‘Apostemes’, ed. Wallner, B. (Lund, 1988), 152.Google Scholar

35 C.24 q.3 C.27 (C1C 1: 997–8); Glossa ordinaria to Decretales Gregorii IX, 5.7.9; Balbus, Johannes, Catholicon (Lyon, 1492), v Google Scholar. Heresis; Pagula, William of, Summa summarum, V. X. q.41 (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 293, fol. 178v).Google Scholar