Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:37:10.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change and Change Back: the Development of English Parish Church Chancels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Carol F. Davidson
Carol F. Davidson*
Affiliation:
Victoria History of the Counties of England, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The eleventh-century core of the church at Wittering, Northamptonshire (Fig. 1a), is typical of the type of church which served local communities in the Anglo-Saxon period. It has a rectangular nave and a short, square chancel. Kilpeck, Herefordshire (Fig. 1b), is an equally typical example of a post-Conquest, twelfth-century local church. It also has a rectangular nave, but it has a longer, apsidal chancel. Such early twentieth-century authors on the development of English parish churches as A. Hamilton Thompson and Alfred Clapham suggested that the use of apses for smaller, post-Conquest churches is an example of French/Norman influence overriding the existing English/Anglo-Saxon forms. They cite the widespread use of apses after the Conquest not only for smaller churches, but also for virtually every major church built in the wake of the Conquest, and the use of apses for churches of all sizes in France in the late eleventh and twelfth centuries. The use of square ends for later medieval parish church chancels such as those at Polebrook, Northamptonshire (Fig. 2a), or Linton, Herefordshire (Fig. 2b), Clapham suggested, marked a return to native English forms after the immediate impact of the Conquest had passed. But is this actually the case? Or are the rectangular, square-ended chancels so typical of later medieval English parish churches a response to new demands being placed upon these buildings? This paper will explore this issue, and ask whether the use of square-ended chancels represents a continuity with, or a change from, older forms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 35: Continuity and Change in Christian Worship , 1999 , pp. 65 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The term local church is used here to encompass both parish churches and those churches which served local communities, but which had not yet attained parochial status.

2 Thompson, A. Hamilton, The Ground Plan of the English Parish Church (Cambridge, 1911), p. 53 Google Scholar; Fairwcathcr, F. H., Aisleless Apsidal Churches of Great Britain (Colchester, 1933), pp. 4–5 Google Scholar; Clapham, A. W., English Romanesque Architecture After the Conquest (London, 1934), p. 101 Google Scholar; Cook, G. H., The English Medieval Parish Church (London, 1955), p. 83.Google Scholar

3 Clapham, English Architecture, p. 102; Randall, Gerald, Tlie English Parish Church (London, 1988), p. 27.Google Scholar

4 Morris, Richard, Churches in the Landscape (London, 1989), pp. 165–7.Google Scholar

5 See Richard Morris, ed., The Church in British Archaeology, Council for British Archaeology [hereafter CBA] Research Report, 47 (Oxford, 1983), fig. 24, and W. J. Rodwell, Rivenhall: Investigation of a Villa, Church, and Village, 1950-1977, CBA Research Report, 55 (Oxford, 1986), p. 89, fig. 62, for comparative tables of the plans of excavated churches.

6 Beresford, Maurice and Hunt, J., Wharram Percy: Deserted Medieval Village (London, 1990), pp. 60–1 Google Scholar, figs 43-4; Rodwell, Rivenhall, p. 91.

7 Taylor, H. M. and Taylor, J., Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 3 vols (Cambridge, 1965-78), 3, p. 1028 Google Scholar. The other churches on his list can all be identified as having been major monastic, or cathedral churches.

8 W. J. Rodwell and K. A. Rodwell, ‘St Peter’s church, Barton-on-Humber: excavation and structural study, 1978-81’, Antiquaries Journal, 62 (1982), fig. 3; Bercsford and Hunt, Wharram Percy, pp. 60-1, figs 43-4; Taylor and Taylor, Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 2, p. 641; John Blair, Jane Croom, and Eddie Colman, The early church at Cumnor’, Oxoniensia, 56 (1989), p. 41; W. F. Grimes, The Excavation of Roman and Medieval London (London, 1968), pp. 185-6, fig. 42; Edwin J. Rose, ‘The church of Saint John the Baptist, Reedham, Norfolk: the reuse of Roman materials in a secondary context’, JBAA, 147 (1994), p. 6; W.J. Rodwell and K. Rodwell, Historic Churches: A Wasting Asset, CBA Research Report, 19 (London, 1977), p. 58, fig. 25; Rodwell, Rivenhall, p. 93, fig. 65.

9 Ibid., p. 138.

10 Taylor and Taylor, Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 2, fig. 239.

11 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England), An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in Herefordshire. Volume 1: South-West (London, 1931), pp. 156-7.

12 See Fairwcathcr, Aislelas Apsidal Churches, pp. 25-54, for a list of standing apsidal churches in Britain.

13 Ibid., pp. 4-5.

14 M. F. Hcarn, The rectangular ambulatory in English mediaeval architecture’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 30 (1971), pp. 187-208.

15 Taylor and Taylor, Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 3, p. 1028.

16 Blocklcy, Kevin, ‘Pershore Abbey’, Current Archaeology, 150 (1996), p. 218.Google Scholar

17 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England), An Inventory of Historical Monuments in Dorset. Volume 2, South East, pt. 2 (London, 1970), pp. 308-12.

18 Webb, Geoffrey, Architecture in Britain in the Middle Ages (Harmondsworth, 1956), p. 27.Google Scholar

19 Woodman, Francis, The Architectural History of Canterbury Cathedral (London, 1981), figs 11-13, 24, 28.Google Scholar

20 Thompson, Ground Plan, pp. 44-52; Clapham, Architecture After the Conquest, pp. 101-5.

21 Blair, Croom, and Colman, ‘Cumnor’, p. 41.

22 David Parsons, ‘Sacrarium: ablution drains in early medieval churches’, in L. A. S. Butler and R. K. Morris, eds, The Anglo-Saxon Church: Papers on History, Architecture, and Archaeology in Honour of H. M. Taylor, CBA Research Report, 60 (London, 1986), p. 107; Randall, English Parish Church, p. 28.

23 Davidson, C. F., ‘Written in stone: architecture, liturgy, and the laity in English parish churches c.1125-c.1250’ (University of London Ph.D. thesis, 1998), p. 150.Google Scholar

24 Addleshaw, G. W. O., The Architectural Setting of Anglican Worship (London, 1948), p. 26.Google Scholar

25 Taylor, H. M., The position of the altar in early Anglo-Saxon churches’, Antiquaries Journal, 53 (1973), pp. 53–4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fcrnie, Eric, The Architecture of the Anglo-Saxons (London, 1983), p. 41 Google Scholar; Parsons, ‘Sacrarium’, pp. 101-5.

26 Krautheimcr, Richard, Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (Harmondsworth, 1965), p. 43.Google Scholar

27 Taylor, The position of the altar’, pp. 54-6.

28 Parsons, ‘Sacrarium’, p. 106; Rodwell and Rodwell, ‘Barton-on-Humber’, fig. 6.

29 Fairwcather, Aisleless Apsidal Churches, pp. 25-6; Lawrence R. Hoey, ‘Stone vaults in English parish churches in the early Gothic and decorated periods’, JBAA, 147 (1994), p. 38.

30 Rodwell, Rivenhall, fig. 97.

31 Klauscr, Theodor (trans. J. Halliburton), A Short History of the Western Liturgy (2nd edn, Oxford, 1969), p. 101.Google Scholar

32 Bond, Francis, Gothic Architecture in England (London, 1905), p. 220.Google Scholar

33 Parsons, ‘Sacrarium’, p. 107.