^{page 251 note 1} The edition cited is that with a vindication of Foxe by G. Townsend, London 1843-9, the text being a reprinting of the edition by S. Cattley, London 1837-41. All references will be cited as A. & M.

^{page 252 note 1} A. & M. v, 647-52. Lambeth Palace Library, Reg[ister of Archbishop] Warham, ff. 159^r-75^v.

^{page 252 note 2} Reg. Warham, ff. 150^r, 159^v, 160^r.

^{page 252 note 3} Mozley, J. F., John Foxe and his Book, London 1940, 218-20Google Scholar. Mozley argues that the Kent Lollards were accused of this article, but not found guilty on that particular charge. This opinion is based on conjecture only.

^{page 252 note 4} Reynolds’ Chapel, Norwich, Reg. Alnwick, ff. 108^r-9^v.

^{page 252 note 5} Westminster Cathedral MS B.2.8. I am grateful to Mr J. Fines for drawing my attention to this MS and to Fr B. Fisher for arranging the supply of a microfilm of it to me.

^{page 252 note 6} Ussher’s transcripts from this and other MSS are preserved in T[rinity] C[ollege] D[ublin] MS D.3.4. The neatness of the Westminster Cathedral MS suggests that it cannot be the original court-book, and a duplication in the text at f. 82^r suggests a copyist’s error. It seems possible that the MS may have been sent to Archbishop Chichele as a certification of action taken against heretics, in accordance with his request in the convocation of 1428. Reg. Chichele, ed. Jacob, E. F., Canterbury and York Society, Oxford 1938-47, III, 190 Google Scholar.

^{page 253 note 1} T.C.D. MS D.3.4, ff. 119^r, 122^v, 128^v.

^{page 253 note 2} Fasciculi Zizaniorum, ed. Shirley, W. W., RS 1858, 417-32Google Scholar. A. & M. III, 591. A footnote reference in Foxe says ‘ex Waldeno,’ and it is more probable that this refers to the Fasciculi than to the Doctrinale.

^{page 254 note 1} My italics, J.A.F.T.

^{page 254 note 2} A. & M. in, 589-90. Westminster Cathedral MS B.2.8, passim.

^{page 254 note 3} Since this paper was delivered, this article has appeared; Fines, J., ‘The Post-Mortem Condemnation for Heresy of Richard Hunne, in EHR LXXVIII, 528-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

^{page 255 note 1} T.C.D. MS D.3.4, f. 122^v. Guildhall Library, London, Reg. Fitzjames, ff. 25^r-6^v. A. & M. iv, 175.

^{page 255 note 2} Reg. Fitzjames, f. 4^r. A. & M. iv, 126. Ussher’s transcripts throw some additional light on the case, but do not enable any further check to be made on Foxe. Mozley, op. cit. 217-18, attempts to argue round Āis charge, and while he is not completely con vincing, his arguments have some degree of force.

^{page 255 note 3} A. & M. iv, 174. The names found in T.C.D. MS D.3.4 include those of John and Thomas Forge, and Thomas Goodred, f. 123^r, Thomas Walker alias Talbot, John Cal verton, and Richard Woolman, f. 123^v, Roger Hilliar, f. 124^r.., George Browne, f. 124^v, and Robert Rascal, f. 125^r.

^{page 255 note 4} A. & M. iv, 123, 214.

^{page 255 note 5} P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice] Significations (C. 85), file 115, no. 10.

^{page 256 note 1} A. & M. iv, 123.

^{page 256 note 2} Ibid. iv, 123, 208-9.

^{page 256 note 3} P.R.O. Significations (C. 85), file 115, no. 13.

^{page 256 note 4} T.C.D. MS D.34, f. 128^v. ‘Known man’ was a term used among the Lollards to describe themselves.

^{page 256 note 5} A. & M. iv, 227.

^{page 256 note 6} Joint Record Office, Lincoln, Episcopal Court Book C.j/2, ff. 23^v-4^r.

^{page 257 note 1} A. & M. IV, 235. Diocesan Registry, Salisbury, Reg. Audley, f. 163^r.