^{Page 23 of note 1} Letts, M., Mandeville’s Travels. Text and translations (The Hakluyt Society, ser. II, vols. CI, CII), London 1953, 1, 11–12 Google Scholar; cf. 236-7, 423.

^{Page 23 of note 2} Hasluck, F. W., Christianity and Islam under the Sultans, II, Oxford 1929, 363-9Google Scholar. cf.Browning, R., Greece—Ancient and Medieval (Inaugural lecture, Birkbeck College), London 1966, 9 Google Scholar.

^{Page 24 of note 1} The following works may be consulted on the subject of education in the last centuries of Byzantium: Fuchs, F., Die höheren Schulen von Konstantinopel im Mittelalter (Byzantinisches Archiv, 8), Leipzig 1926 (reprinted, Amsterdam 1964)Google Scholar; Schemmel, F., ‘Die Schulen von Konstantinopel vom 12.-15. Jahrhundert’, Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift, XXV, 237, no. 8 (1925), 236-9Google Scholar; Tafrali, O., Thessalonique au quatorzième siècle, Paris 1913 Google Scholar; Bréhier, L., ‘Notes sur l’histoire de l’enseignement supérieur à Constantinople’, Byzantion, III (1926-7), 73–94 Google Scholar; idem, ‘L’enseignement classique et l’enseignement religieux à Byzance’, Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses, XXI (1941), 34-69; idem, Le monde byzantin, III: La civilisation byzantine, Paris 1950, 456-503; Runciman, S., Byzantine Civilisation, London 1933, 223-39Google Scholar; Buckler, G., ‘Byzantine Education’, in Byzantium. An Introduction to East Roman Civilization, ed. Baynes, N. H. and Moss, H. St. L. B., Oxford 1948, 200-20Google Scholar; Koukoules, Ph., Βυζαντινών βίος καί πολιτισμός: Vie et Civilisation byzantines (Collection de l’Institut français d’Athènes, 10), I, 1, Athens 1948, 35–137 Google Scholar; Tatakis, B., La philosophie byzantine (= Bréhier, E., Histoire de philosophie, fase, suppl. II), 2nd. ed., Paris 1959, 228–314 Google Scholar; Hunger, H., ‘Von Wissenschaft und Kunst der frühen Palaiologenzeit’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen byzantinischen Gesellschaft, VIII (1959), 123-55Google Scholar; Browning, R., ‘The Patriarchal School at Constantinople in the twelfth century’, Byzantion, XXXII (1963), 167–202 Google Scholar, XXXIII (1963), 11-40.

^{Page 24 of note 2} Basil, Regulae brevius tractatae, Interrogatio CCXCII: PG, XXXI, 1288 B. Council in Trullo, canon 64: PG, CXXXVII, 736 B-C.

^{Page 25 of note 1} Saint Basile, Aux Jeunes Gens sur la manière de tirer profit des lettres helléniques, ed. Boulenger, F., Paris 1952, 43-4Google Scholar; Socrates, , Ecclesiastical History, iii, cap. 16, ed. Bright, W., Oxford 1878, 156-8Google Scholar. Dölger, F., ‘Der Klassizismus der Byzantiner, seine Ursachen und seine Folgen’, Geistige Arbeit, V, 12 (1938), 3–5 Google Scholar (= F. Dölger, ∏APAΣ∏OPA, Ettal 1961, 38-45); idem, ‘Zur Bedeutung von φιλóσoφoς und φιλoσoφία in byzantinischen Zeit’, in F. Dölger, Byzanz und die europäische Staatenwelt, Ettal 1953, 197-208.

^{Page 25 of note 2} John of Damascus, Fons Scientiae (∏ηγή Γνώσεως), in PG, XCIV, 524 C-525 A, 532 B. Cf. the remark of Eustathios of Thessalonica (PG, CXXXV, 645) that the honey to be found in pagan learning may be wild, but it is none the less sweet.

^{Page 26 of note 1} See Hussey, J. M., Church and Learning in the Byzantine Empire, 867-1185, London 1937, 73–88 Google Scholar; idem, Ascetics and Humanists in eleventh-century Byzantium, Cambridge 1960.

^{Page 26 of note 2} Hussey, Church and Learning, 89-102; Cambridge Medieval History, ed. J. M. Hussey, IV, 2, Cambridge 1967,195-6.

^{Page 27 of note 1} Browning, R., ‘A new source on Byzantine-Hungarian relations in the twelfth century. The inaugural lecture of Michael δ τοϋ Άγχιάλου as ΰπατος τών φιλοσόφων’, Balkan Studies, II (1961), especially 181-5, 189-90Google Scholar. Cf.Dölger, F., in Camb. Med. Hist., IV, 2, 245 Google Scholar.

^{Page 28 of note 1} Cf. Bréhier, ‘L’enseignement classique’, loc. cit., 67-8.

^{Page 28 of note 2} Tim, I. vi. 20. Cf. Syméon le Nouveau Théologien: Traités Théologiques et Éthiques, ed. Darrouzès, J., I (Sources Chrétiennes, 122), Paris 1966, Theol. i, 116 line 271 f.Google Scholar, and passim.

^{Page 28 of note 3} See now Underwood, P. A., The Kariye Djami, 3 vols., New York 1966, London 1967 Google Scholar.

^{Page 29 of note 1} On the uses of the name Hellene, see, e.g. K. Lechner, Hellenen und Barbaren im Weltbild der Byzantiner, Dissertation, Munich 1954; S. Runciman, ‘Byzantine and Hellene in the fourteenth century’, бόμος Κωνσταντίνου ‘Αρμενοπούλου, Thessalonike 1952, 27-31; Ditten, H., ‘Βάρβαροί, “Ελληνες und ‘Ρωμαΐοι bei den letzten byzantinischen Geschichtsschreibern’, Actes du XII^e Congrès International d’Études Byzantines, II (Belgrade 1964), 273-99Google Scholar.

^{Page 30 of note 1} Fuchs, Die höheren Schulen, 54-8; Schemmel, op. cit., 237; Bréhier, ‘L’enseignement classique’, loc. cit., 56-7. On the condemnation of Aristotle’s scientific works in the West, see Bolgar, R. R., The Classical Heritage and its Beneficiaries, Cambridge 1954, 180-82, 412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

^{Page 31 of note 1} Fuchs, Die höheren Schulen, 59-60.

^{Page 31 of note 2} Fuchs, op. cit., 60.

^{Page 31 of note 3} On the life and works of Planoudes, see Maximi monachi Planudis Epistulae, ed. Treu, M., Breslau 1890, especially 188-95Google Scholar; Krumbacher, K., Geschichte der byzantinischen Litteratur, 2nd. ed., Munich 1897, 99, 543-6Google Scholar; Beck, H.-G., Kirche und theologische Literatur im byzantinischen Reich, Munich 1959, 686-7Google Scholar; Tatakis, La philosophie byzantine, 239-41; Sarton, G., Introduction to the History of Science (Carnegie Institute of Washington), II, Baltimore 1931, 973-4Google Scholar; III, 1 (1947), 119-21; Wendel, C., in Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, XX (1950)Google Scholar, s.v. Planudes; Vogel, K., in Camb. Med. Hist. IV, 2, 275-6Google Scholar. Planoudes’s treatise on Arithmetic (ψηφοφορία κατ’ “Ινδους) was re-edited by his contemporary Nicholas Rhabdas, on whom see Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 681-2Google Scholar; Vogel, , loc. cit., 277, 278 Google Scholar. On Manuel Moschopoulos, see Krumbacher, op. cit., 546-9; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 679-81Google Scholar; Beck, op. cit., 680-81.

^{Page 32 of note 1} On Pachymeres, see Krumbacher, , op. cit., 95, 288-91Google Scholar; Sarton, , op. cit., II, 972-3Google Scholar; Beck, op. cit., 679. On Thomas Magister and Demetrios Triklinios, see Krumbacher, op. cit., 548-50, 554-6; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 996-7Google Scholar; Beck, op. cit., 704-05.

^{Page 32 of note 2} Letters of Theodore Hyrtakenos, ed. La Porte-du Theil, J. F. G., in Notices et Extraits des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale, VI (1800), 34, no. 15 Google Scholar.

^{Page 33 of note 1} The intellectual atmosphere of Thessalonica and Constantinople in the fourteenth century is described by, e.g., Verpeaux, J., Nicêphore Choumnos, homme d’état et humaniste byzantin (ca 1250/1255-1327), Paris 1959, 186-7, 190 Google Scholar; Tafrali, Thessalonique au XIV^e siècle, chapter iii; Guilland, R., Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, l’homme et l’oeuvre, Paris 1926, 58–78 Google Scholar; P. Tannery, Quadrivium de Georges Pachymère (Studi e Testi, 94), Vatican 1940 (Preface by V. Laurent, ‘Le Quadrivium et la formation intellectuelle sous les Paléologues’); Beck, H.-G., Theodores Metochites. Die Krise des byzantinischen Weltbildes im 14. Jahrhundert, Munich 1952 Google Scholar; Hunger, H., ‘Von Wissenschaft und Kunst der frühen Palaiologenzeit’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen byzantinischen Gesellschaft, VIII (1959), 137-55Google Scholar. For the quality of άστειότης as ‘das beste Gegenstück zum lateinischen ,,humanitas” ‘, see Beck, Theodoros Metochites, 64. The archaizing Greek of late Byzantine writers is discussed most recently by Kriaras, E., ‘Diglossie des derniers siècles de Byzance: Naissance de la littérature néo-hellénique’, Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Byzantine Studies (Oxford 1967), 284-92Google Scholar.

^{Page 33 of note 2} The dispute between Choumnos and Metochites is the subject of an exhaustive study by I. Ševčenko, Études sur la Polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos. La vie intellectuelle et politique à Byzance sous les premiers Paléologues (Corpus Bruxellense Historiae Byzantinae, Subsidia, III), Brussels 1962. Cf. Verpeaux, Nicéphore Choumnos, 52-62, 152-7.

^{Page 34 of note 1} Nikephoros, Gregoras, Historia Bynantina, ed. Schopen, L., Bonn 1829-30, viii, 8 Google Scholar: I, 327 lines 12-17: ού μόνον εύκοσμίας καΐ άσκήσεως έργαστήριον τον βασιλικον κατέστησεν οΐκον . . . άλλά καΐ λογικής φάναι παιδεύσεως κράτιστον γυμνάσιον κα£, οΐον είπειν, έλλογ£μων γλωσσών στρατόπεδον. ibid., viii, 8: I, 334-5: πρυτανεΐον παντοδαπης παιδείας. Cf. Fuchs, op. cit., 62-3.

^{Page 34 of note 2} Gregoras, , Historia, vi, 5 Google Scholar: I, 180-82. Cf.George, Pachymeres, De Michaele et Andronico Palaeologis, ed. Bekker, I., Bonn 1835, ii, 13, 16 Google Scholar: II, 139 f., 147-52. On the Patriarch Athanasios I, see Guilland, R., ‘La correspondance inédite d’Athanase, Patriarche de Constantinople (1289-93; 1304-1310)’, Melanges Charles Diehl, I, Paris 1930, 121-40Google Scholar (= Guilland, R., Études Byzantines, Paris 1959, 53–79 Google Scholar); Banescu, N., ‘Le Patriarche Athanase I^er et Andronic II Paléologue. État religieux, politique et social de l’empire’, Académie Roumaine, Bulletin de la section historique, XXIII (1942), 28–56 Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 692; Laurent, V., ‘Le serment de l’empereur Andronic II Paléologue au Patriarche Athanase I^er, lors de sa seconde accession au trône œcuménique (Sept. 1303)’, Revue des Études byzantines, XXIII (1965), 124-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

^{Page 35 of note 1} συμμίξας ίερωσύνην καΐ φιλοσοφίαν: Gouillard, J., ‘Après le schisme Arsénite. La correspondance inédite du pseudo-Jean Chilas’, Académie Roumaine, Bull, de la sect. bist., XXV (1944) 196 line 46Google Scholar.

^{Page 35 of note 2} P. Tannery, Quadrivium de Georges Pacbymère, Preface (V. Laurent), xx-xxi; text, p. 6 line 1 f.:...μαθήματα καί παίγνια τοΰ νοός είσιν ...; ρ. 7 line 11 f.: Δήλον γάρ οτι κλίμαξί τισι καΐ γεφύραις Ζοικε ταϋτα τά μαθήματα, δίαβφάζοντα τήν διάνοιαν ήμών άπο τών αίσθητών καΐ δοξαστών έπΐ τά νοητά καΐ έπιστημονικά . . .

^{Page 35 of note 3} See Treu, M., ‘Der Philosoph Joseph’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, VIII (1899), 1–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dräseke, J., ‘Zum Philosophen Joseph’, Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie, XLII (1899), 612-20Google Scholar; Guilland, R., Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras, Paris 1927, 338-42Google Scholar; Tatakis, op. cit., 244-6; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 688.

^{Page 36 of note 1} The Introduction to Joseph’s Encyclopaedia, with an epitome of its contents in iambic verse, is published by M. Treu, ‘Der Philosoph Joseph’, loc. cit., 34-42. The complete manuscript of the work is in Florence, Cod. Riccardianus 31. See Vitelli, G., ‘Indice de’ codici greci Riccardiani, Magliabecchiani e Marucelliani’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica, II (1894), 490-93Google Scholar; Cf.Terzaghi, N., ‘Sulla composizione dell’encyclopediadel filosofo Giuseppe’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica, X (1902), 121-32Google Scholar.

^{Page 36 of note 2} ed. Treu, loc. cit., 40 lines 63-66.

^{Page 36 of note 3} Cod. Riccard. 31, fol. 225^r, cited by Vitelli, op. cit., 491.

^{Page 37 of note 1} Verpeaux, Nicêphore Choumnos, 184-5: ‘Il semble donc que les idées exprimées par Choumnos dans ses ouvrages aient correspondu aux idées définies par le pouvoir impérial et les autorités ecclésiastiques et aient constitué comme la charte de la pensée philosophique officielle à Byzance autour de 1315’.

^{Page 37 of note 2} Letters of Nikephoros Choumnos, ed. Boissonade, J. F., Anecdota Nova, Paris 1844, 49, no. 39 Google Scholar. This letter and the sentiments in it have been erroneously attributed to Theodore Metochites by, e.g., Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, 67, and Tatakis, op. cit., 250. But see Verpeaux, , Nicéphore Choumnos, 171, 176-8Google Scholar.

^{Page 37 of note 3} Verpeaux, op. cit., 141-6; Tatakis, op. cit., 247; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 587-8Google Scholar. The interest of Choumnos in mathematics and astronomy was comparatively small, but it was coloured by his personal vendetta with Theodore Metochites, the self-appointed atronomer royal of the court. Cf.Verpeaux, , op. cit., 152-7, 171 f.Google Scholar; Ševčenko, Études sur la Polémique, 68-109.

^{Page 38 of note 1} In the Introduction to his Encyclopaedia Joseph admits that it is strange for a rakendytes, who by profession seeks the perfection of his soul, to busy himself with laborious expositions of the natural sciences; ed. Treu, loc. cit., 38 lines 8-18.

^{Page 38 of note 2} Verpeaux, op. cit., 184.

^{Page 38 of note 3} On John Pediasimos, see Krumbacher, op. cit., 556-8; Tatakis, op. cit., 242-3; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 710-11; Vogel, , in Camb. Med. Hist., IV, 2, 275 Google Scholar.

^{Page 39 of note 1} Cf. Tatakis, op. cit., 242-3; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 682-3Google Scholar; Verpeaux, op. cit., 162.

^{Page 39 of note 2} Several fourteenth-century documents relating to the condemnation by the Patriarch and the synod of magical practices, sorcery, and witch-craft are published in Miklosich, F. and Müller, J., Acta et Diplomata Graeca medii aevi sacra et profana, I, Vienna 1860, 180-81, 181-2, 184-8, 301-06, 342-4, 541-50Google Scholar. Cf. F. Cumont, ‘Démétrios Chloros et les Cyranides’, Bulletin de la Société nationale des Antiquaires de France (1919), 175-80; Oeconomos, L., ‘L’état intellectuel et moral des Byzantins vers le milieu du XIV^e siècle d’après une page de Joseph Bryennios’, Mélanges Charles Diehl, I, Paris 1930, 225-33Google Scholar.

^{Page 39 of note 3} Gregoras, , Historia, viii, 11 Google Scholar: I, 358; ix, 5: I, 411-12; xvi, 5: II, 825. Cf.Vogel, , in Camb. Med. Hist., IV, 2, 296-9Google Scholar and bibliography, pp. 464-5; Verpeaux, op. cit., 168-70.

^{Page 40 of note 1} On Theodore Metochites see Krumbacher, op. cit., 550-54; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 684-8Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 700-01; Guilland, Correspondance de Nicéphore Grègoras, 358-69; idem, ‘Les poésies inédites de Théodore Métochite’, in Guilland, Études Byzantines, Paris 1959, 177-205 (reprinted from Byzantion, III (1926), 265-302); Hunger, H., ‘Theodoros Metochites als Vorläufer des Humanismus in Byzanz’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, LV (1952), 4–19 Google Scholar; Loenertz, R.-J., ‘Théodore Métochites et son père’, Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum, XXIII (1953), 185 f.Google Scholar; Ševčenko, Études sur la Polémique, passim; and especially Beck, H.-G., Theodoros Metochites, Munich 1952 Google Scholar.

^{Page 40 of note 2} Ševčenko, I., ‘Observations sur les recueils des Discours et des Poèmes de Th. Métochite et sur la Bibliothèque de Chora à Constantinople’, Scriptorium, V (1951), 279-88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. 284-5.

^{Page 40 of note 3} Gregoras, , Historia, xi, 11 Google Scholar: I, 271-3; cf. 272 line 3 f.: βιβλιοθήκη γάρ ήν ϊμψυχος οδτος καΐ τών ζητουμένων πρόχειρος εύπορία.

^{Page 40 of note 4} Theodori Metochitae Miscellanea philosophica et historica (Ύπομνημα- τισμοΐ καΐ Σημειώσεις γνωμικαί), ed. C. G. Müller and T. Kiessling, Leipzig 1821 (reprinted, Amsterdam 1966).

^{Page 41 of note 1} Metochites, , Misc., 14–16, 595 Google Scholar. Cf. Beck, Theodoras Metochites, 61.

^{Page 41 of note 2} Cf. Beck, Theodoros Metochites, 92-95.

^{Page 41 of note 3} Metochites, , Misc., 23–34, no. 3 Google Scholar: ΠερΙ της άσαφείας τών Άριστοτέλους συνταγμάτων. Cf. 81-5, 85-96, and passim. In his letter to a friend on the death of Joseph the Philosopher, ed. Treu, , op. cit., Byzantinische Zeitschrift, VIII (1899), 11 lines 16-17Google Scholar, Metochites speaks of: Άριστοτέλης μετά της εΐθισμένης δολερας έπικρύψεως φεύγων τάς έπιδήλους λαβάς καΐ τούς έλέγχους .... Cf. Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, 67-8; Tatakis, op. cit., 250-52; Beck, Theodoros Wletochites, 70. Gregoras on the other hand (Correspondance, ed. Guilland, 59-61, no. 13), says that Metochites had still two gaps to be filled in his studies, the Logic and the Metaphysics of Aristotle. Even his knowledge of Plato seems to have been somewhat superficial. Cf. Ševčenko, Études sur la Polémique, 77-83.

^{Page 41 of note 4} Despite the publication of the Quadrivium of Pachymeres some years before his time, Metochites repeatedly applauds his own role as the restorer of the lost sciences of mathematics and astronomy; e.g., in the Introduction to his own astronomical treatise, ed. Sathas, K. N., Μεσαιωνική Βιβλιοθήκη, I, Venice 1872, p. ρια′ Google Scholar; also in his poems and in his polemical works against Nikephoros Choumnos. See, e.g., Guilland, , ‘Les poésies inédites’, loc. cit., 181, 200 Google Scholar; Ševčenko, , Études sur la Polémique, 78 n. 3, 109-11Google Scholar, 115 n. 2, 201-03 (Logos 13, cap. 13).

^{Page 41 of note 5} Προεισαγωγή είς τήν τοϋ Πτολεμαίου Σύνταξιν, and Στοιχείωσις έπΐ τη άστρονομικη έπιστήμη. Both remain unedited, save for the introduction to the former and the introduction and chapter-headings of the latter, which are printed in Sathas, op. cit., I, pp. πδ′-ριθ′.

^{Page 42 of note 1} Metochites, , ed. Sathas, , op. cit., I, pp. πη′–πθ′ Google Scholar. Cf. Verpeaux, Nicéphore Choumnos, 157-64; Guilland, Essai sur Nicêpbore Grégoras, 70. On the transmission of oriental knowledge of mathematics and astronomy to Byzantium in the mid-fourteenth century, see Pingree, D., ‘Gregory Chioniades and Palaeologan astronomy’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, XVIII (1964), 133-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Metochites, however, wrote his own astronomical work some six years before the translation into Greek of the Astronomical Syntaxis of the Persians, which inspired the translations and commentaries of scholars like George Chrysokokkes and Gregory Chioniades of Trebizond. Cf.Ševčenko, , Études sur la Polémique, 73-5, 96-7, 115 Google Scholar.

^{Page 42 of note 2} Cf., e.g. Metochites, , Misc., 264-8, no. 43 Google Scholar: “Οτι ήδιστον ή τοϋ ούρανοϋ καΐ τών κατ’ ούρανον έποπτεία. Guilland, ‘Les poésies inédites’, 195-6. Pachymeres had likewise attacked astrologers and horoscope-mongers who ‘speak vain and empty words from their bellies and invalidate the concept of free will’: Tannery, Quadrivium, 391 lines 12-20.

^{Page 42 of note 3} Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 700-01; Hunger, ‘Theodoros Metochites’, loc. cit., 9; Verpeaux, Nicéphore Choumnos, 191.

^{Page 43 of note 1} Beck, Theodoras Metochites, 63; Tatakis, op. cit., 253-4.

^{Page 43 of note 2} Metochites, Logos 13 (‘Réfutation des hommes de lettres incultes’), ed. Ševčenko, Études sur la Polémique, § 5, p. 193.

^{Page 43 of note 3} Metochites, Misc., 370-77; Gregoras, , Historia, xix, 1 Google Scholar: II, 930 line 5 f. Part of the treatise of Nicholas Kabasilas against the Sceptics is edited by Elter, A. and Radermacher, L., Analecta Graeca, Bonn 1899 Google Scholar. Cf. Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 781-2; Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, 206-07; Beck, Theodores Metochites, 67; Verpeaux, op. cit., 191.

^{Page 43 of note 4} Metochites, , Misc., 484-91, no. 73 Google Scholar. The eremitic life he describes as being undesirable (p. 486) for the following reasons: πόρρω γάρ δήτοΰτο πάνυ τοι της Χριστιανικής νομοθεσίας, καί τών καθ’ ήμδς, ώς ούκ άλλο τι, καθάπαξ άλλοτριώτατον. Cf. Misc. 491-511, nos. 74, 75, 76. Beck, Theodoras Metochi ies, 31 f.

^{Page 44 of note 1} Guilland, ‘Les poésies inédites’, loc. cit., 184-5; Hunger, op. cit., 14-15.

^{Page 44 of note 2} Theodore, Hyrtakenos, Letters, ed. La Porte-du, Theil, loc. cit., VI, 738, no. 19 Google Scholar.

^{Page 44 of note 3} The published and unpublished works of Gregoras are listed by Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grêgoras, xxxi-xxxv. Cf. Guilland, Correspondance de Nicépbore Grégoras; Krumbacher, , op. cit., 102, 293-7Google Scholar; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 949-53Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 719-21. His paper on the reform of the calendar and the computation of Easter is inserted in his Historia, viii, 13: I, 364-73.

^{Page 45 of note 1} Gregoras, , Historia, viii, 13: I, 364Google Scholar.

^{Page 45 of note 2} Gregoras, , Historia, x, 8 Google Scholar: I, 512-20. Gregoras, , Florentios ή περΐ σοφίας, ed. Jahn, A., Jahns Jahrbuch, X (1844), 531-2Google Scholar. Cf. Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, 167-8, 205-06.

^{Page 45 of note 3} Gregoras, , Homily on the Nativity of the Virgin, ed. Schmitt, N., ‘Kahrie Džami’, Izvestila Russkago Archeologiüeskago Instituta v Konstantinopole, XI (1906), 280-94 (293)Google Scholar. Metochites, , ed. Treu, , Byzantinische Zeitschrift, VIII (1899), 11 lines 25–28 Google Scholar, similarly observes that ‘the most apposite passages to be found in these two men (Plotinus and Proclus) and their followers are not so very different or far removed from our own doctrines and the precepts of the truth’.

^{Page 45 of note 4} Gregoras, , Historia, ix, 5 Google Scholar: I, 411 lines 23-4 (ψευδομάντεις καΐ έγγα-στρίμυθοι); cf. 722. Guilland, , Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras, 143, no. 33 (letter to John Chrysoloras)Google Scholar; 188-93, no. 49 (letter to a bishop concerning the detractors of astronomy).

^{Page 46 of note 1} PG, CXLIX, 521-642. Cf. Guilland, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, 211.

^{Page 46 of note 2} Gregoras, , Historia, ix, 14 Google Scholar: I, 460-61; viii, 15:1, 384-5; xi, 3: I, 536; xv, 2: II, 749-50.

^{Page 46 of note 3} e.g. Cf.Gregoras, , Historia, iv, 8 Google Scholar: I, 108-09 with xiv, 8: II, 722-6, where Gregoras declares divination from the stars to be a vain pursuit. When Andronikos II was dying he summoned Gregoras to ask him whether the stars could do any better for him than his doctors; but he declined and died before Gregoras had time to give an answer. Gregoras, , Historia, xi, 11 Google Scholar: I, 559.

^{Page 46 of note 4} Gregoras, Florentios, ed. Jahn, 531 f.

^{Page 47 of note 1} Gregoras, , Historia, xi, 10 Google Scholar: I, 555 line 10 f. The career and works of Barlaam are outlined by, e.g., Krumbacher, op. cit., 100-02; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 1, 583-7Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 717-19.

^{Page 48 of note 1} See especially Meyendorff, J., Introduction à l’Étude de Grégoire Palomas (Patristica Sorbonensia, 3), Paris 1959 Google Scholar (English translation by G. Lawrence, Faith Press, London 1964); Lossky, V., The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, London 1957 Google Scholar.

^{Page 48 of note 2} This was the verdict of the Patriarch Neilos in his Encomium of Palomas, PG, CLI, 664 A-D.

^{Page 48 of note 3} Cf. Tatakis, op. cit., 271; Beck, Theodores Metochites, 52 f.

^{Page 48 of note 4} Gregoras, , Historia, viii, 8 Google Scholar: I, 327-8.

^{Page 49 of note 1} Meyendorff, Introduction, 45-50.

^{Page 49 of note 2} In his second letter to Barkam (unpublished) Palamas seems to have shown that, in his earlier days, he was more receptive to the uses of rational argument in theology. The title of this letter is given in PG, CL, 834: To αύτοΰ προς τόν Βαρλαάμ γράφοντα 8τι ούκ Ζστιν άπόδειξις έπ’ ούδενος τών θείων, Ζλεγχος, δτι ϊστιν έφ’ ών καΐ δτι κυρίως άπόδειξις αΰτη, ή δέ κατ’ Άριστοτέλην άπόδειξις άσύστατον καΐ το ύπέρ αύτήν άχρεΐον. Cf. Meyendorff, Introduction, 346-7.

^{Page 49 of note 3} Palamas, Physica, Theologica, Moralia et Practica Capita CL, in PG, CL, 1121-1225. Cf. Meyendorff, Introduction, 192.

^{Page 49 of note 4} Grégoire Palamas, Défense des saints hésychastes, ed. Meyendorff, J. (Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 30, 31), Louvain 1959, I, 1, § 11, pp. 34–37 Google Scholar. The whole of the first treatise in the series of Triads of Palamas (pp. 1-69) is on the subject of the use and abuse of learning (κατά τί καΐ μέχρι τίνος λυσιτελής ή περΐ λάγους τρφή). Cf. Meyendorff, Introduction, 192, 347.

^{Page 50 of note 1} Palamas, , Défense des saints hésychastes, Triads, II, 1, § 35, pp. 294-97Google Scholar. Cf. Meyendorff, Introduction, 349.

^{Page 50 of note 2} Rom. I, 18 f.

^{Page 50 of note 3} Palamas, Homiliae, XXXIV (On the Metamorphosis of Christ), in PG, CLI, 424 A-D.

^{Page 51 of note 1} Palamas, Capita, in PG, CL, 1137 A-C: Ού μόνον бе τό γινώσκειν κατά το έγχωροϋν έν άληθείαι Θεον άσυγκρίτως κρεΐττον της καθ’ “Ελληνας φιλοσοφίας έστίν, άλλά καΐ μόνον το είδένοα τίνα τόπον Ζχει ό ιϊνθρωπος παρά τφ Θεφ, πασαν ύπερβαίνει τήν κατ’ έκείνους σοφίαν . . . Cf. 1140 C.

^{Page 51 of note 2} John Cantacuzene, cited from Cod. Parisinus graecus 1247, fol. 94^v by Tafrali, Thessalonique au XIV^e siècle, 169: ΈπεΙδέ πασα ή τών Έλλήνων σοφία, λέγεται μέν οΟτω σοφία, έκτος δέ σοφία παρ’ ήμών τών πιστών ονομά-ζεται, δήλον οΐμαι πασι καθεστηκέναι, ώς ούκ άν το έκτος Ζνδον εϊη ποτ’ άν της τών θεολόγων διδασκαλίας• οΐσθα δέ πάντως καΐ αύτός, ώς δούλη καΐ θεραπαινίς έστί τε καΐ άνομάζεται της δντως σοφίας τών όρθοδόξων.

^{Page 52 of note 1} Philotheos, Contra Gregoram antirrhetici, I: PG, CLI, 783-5, 827-8.

^{Page 53 of note 1} Cited from an unpublished Homily of Isidore in Cod. Parisinus graecus 1192, fol. 238, by Tafrali, op. cit., 157 and n. 4. Cf. the similar remark of Roger Bacon on the superiority of the pagans to the Christians of his time, ‘in virtutibus quae communiter requiruntur ad vitae honestatem et ad communionem humanae societatis’, in Opus Majus, ed. Bridges, J. H., Oxford 1897-1900, II, 322-3Google Scholar.

^{Page 53 of note 2} Nicholas, Kabasilas, Letters, ed. Enepekides, P., ‘Der Briefwechsel des Mystikers Nikolaos Kabasilas’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, XLVI (1953), 36, no. 8 lines 1-21Google Scholar. Cf.Loenertz, R.-J., ‘Chronologie de Nicolas Cabasilas, 1345-1354’, Orientalia Christiana Periodica, XXI (1955), 205-31Google Scholar, especially 214-15.

^{Page 53 of note 3} On Isaac Argyros, see Sarton, , op. cit., III, 2, 1511-12Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 729-30; Mercati, G., Notizie di Procoro e Demetrio Cidone, Manuele Caleca e Teodoro Meliteniota ed altri appunti . . . (Studi e Testi, 56), Vatican 1931, 229-42, 270-75Google Scholar.

^{Page 54 of note 1} Vogel, K., in Camb. Med. Hist., IV, 2, 277-8Google Scholar. Cf.Sarton, , op. cit., III, 2, 1512-14Google Scholar; Mercati, op. cit., passim; Pingree, , op. cit., Dumbarton Oaks Papers, XVIII (1964), 140 fGoogle Scholar.

^{Page 54 of note 2} Theodore Meliteniotes, in PG, CXLIX, 988 C-989 B, 993 A-B.

^{Page 54 of note 3} Cf.Turyn, A., Codices Graeci Vaticani saeculis XIII et XIV scripti annorumque notis instructi, Vatican 1964, 150-53Google Scholar. It is interesting with regard to the uses of the word ‘Hellene’ that Kydones refers to his translation as ‘the work of Thomas against the Hellenes’ (i.e. Gentiles) (το τοϋ Θωμα καθ’ Έλλήνων βιβλίον). Mercati, op. cit., 363 line 23. The literature on Demetrios Kydones and his brother Prochoros is exten sive; but see Krumbacher, op. cit., 102-03, 487-9; Sarton, , op. cit., III, 2, 1386-9Google Scholar; Beck, Kirche und theol. Lit., 733-9; idem, Theodores Metochites, 117-21; Guilland, Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras, 325-32; Mercati, op. cit., passim; Cammelli, G., Démétrius Cydonès, Correspondance, Paris 1930 Google Scholar; Loenertz, R.-J., Démétrius Cydonès, Correspondance, 2 vols. (Studi e Testi, 186, 208), Vatican 1956, 1960Google Scholar; Setton, K. M., ‘The Byzantine Background to the Italian Renaissance’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, C, 1 (1956), 52-8Google Scholar; Moravcsik, Gy., Bynantinoturcica, I. Die byzantinischen Quellen der Geschichte der Türkvölker, 2nd. ed. (Berliner byzantinische Arbeiten, 10), Berlin 1958, 244-46Google Scholar.

^{Page 55 of note 1} See Ševčenko, I., ‘The decline of Byzantium seen through the eyes of its intellectuals’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, XV (1961), 169-86Google Scholar.

^{Page 55 of note 2} Demetrios Kydones, Apologie della propria fede, 1: Ai Greci Ortodossi, ed. Mercati, op. cit., 359-403; German translation by Beck, H.-G., ‘Die “Apologia pro vita sua” des Demetrios Kydones’, Ostkirchliche Studien, I (1952), 208-25Google Scholar, 264-82.

^{Page 56 of note 1} Cf. Setton, op. cit., 54-8; Ševčenko, ‘Decline of Byzantium’, loc. cit. , 176-7. On Manuel Chrysoloras and his successors in Italy, see G. Cammelli, Manuele Crisolora (I dotti bizantini e le origini dell’umanesimo, I), Florence 1941; Geanakoplos, D. J., Greek Scholars in Venice. Studies in the dissemination of Greek learning from Byzantium to Western Europe, Cambridge, Mass., 1962 Google Scholar, passim.

^{Page 57 of note 1} Pii II P. M. Orationes, I, Lucca 1755, Or. xiii, 268.