Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:08:39.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Justification of the Godless: Heinrich Vogel and German Guilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2016

Haddon Willmer
Haddon Willmer*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Extract

Guilt has proved an irresistible category for making and interpreting the twentieth-century history of which Germany has been the focus. In that history individuals, organizations, and nations have become guilty. The history of guilt is not made by the wrongdoers alone, but also by those who judge them. Doing wrong and being moralistic often have an evil symbiosis in individuals and communities. Guilt has not always been accurately allocated, and accusations of guilt have been manipulated for political purposes so producing more complex evil. There was guilt for the First World War, but it was untruthfully imposed on Germany alone by Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Within Germany, assigning guilt to political opponents, while refusing to accept any responsibility for what had happened, intensified the divisions within the nation and ensured that its policies were inspired by inward as well as outward enmity and unreality. The theologian H. J. Iwand argued in 1954 that the Nazis had taken the Freund-Feind conception of politics to absurdity, blaming (versündigt) the Left for all that happened after 1918. Consequently, Iwand judged the nationalist front in the Weimar Republic to have represented die organisierte Unbussfertigkeit of the German people. Too late, after 1945, it had become politically clear to many, but not to all, that complex historical guilt must be met by a complex response lest its power escalate yet again beyond the control of truth, understanding, and humanity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History Subsidia , Volume 7: Protestant Evangelicalism , 1990 , pp. 327 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scholder, Klaus, Die Kitchen zwischen Republik und Gewaltherrschaft ed. Aretin, K. O. von and Besier, G. (Berlin, 1988), pp. 59–63Google Scholar.

2 Iwand, H. J., ‘Die Verkundigung des Evangeliums und die politische Existenz’, Theologische Existenz Heute,> NS 41 (1954), pp. 12–16Google Scholar.

3 Algermissen, Konrad, Die Gottlosenbewegung der Gegenwart und ihre Uberwindung (Hanover, 1933), pp. 253, 264Google Scholar; Bohme, Kurt, ‘Die Gottlosen-Bewegung’, Die Christliche Welt, 12 (1931), pp. 563–5Google Scholar.

4 Waldenmeier, H., ‘Antichristencum und Kirche’, Das Evangelisches Deutschland (1931), pp. 241–2, 250–1Google Scholar.

5 Greschat, M., Zwischen Widerspruch und Widerstand (Munich, 1987), pp. 152–3Google Scholar.

6 Vogel, Heinrich, ‘Die christliche Solidarität mit dem Gottlosen’, Die Stimme der Gemeinde, 12 (1960), pp. 679–84Google Scholar; also in Monatschrift für Pastoral Theologie, 27 (1931), pp. 326 ff.; Marquardt, F. W., ‘Solidarität mit den Gottlosen’, Vom Herrengeheimnis der Wahrheit, ed. Scharf, K. (Berlin, 1962), pp. 381–405Google Scholar.

7 Vogel, Heinrich, The Iron Ration of a Christian, trans. Whitehouse, W. A. (London, 1941), pp. 178–98Google Scholar.

8 Vogel, Heinrich, ‘Kreuz und Hakenkreuz’, Zwischen den Zeiten, 11. 3 (1933), pp. 201–6Google Scholar.

9 Vogel, , Iron Ration, p. 7Google Scholar.

10 Dehn, G., Kirche und Völkerversersöhnung (Berlin, 1931), pp. 6–23, 83–6Google Scholar; Bizer, E., ‘Der “Fall Dehn”‘, in Schneemelcher, W., ed., Festschrift für Günther Dehn (Neukirchen, 1957), pp. 238–61Google Scholar.

11 Dibelius, Otto, Friede auf Erden? (Berlin, 1930)Google Scholar; Gollert, F., Dibelius vor Gericht (Munich, 1959), pp. 12–31Google Scholar.

12 Vogel, Heinrich, The Grace of God and German Guilt, trans. Whitehouse, W. A. (London, 1947), pp. 12–13Google Scholar.

13 Jaspers, Karl, Die Schuldfrage (Heidelberg, 1946)Google Scholar.

14 Vogel, , Grace, pp. 28, 35Google Scholar.

15 Barth, Karl, The Germans and Ourselves, trans. Smith, R. Gregor (London, 1945), pp. 34–40Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., pp. 41, 45–6; Luke 18.9-14.

17 Ibid., pp. 49–57.

18 Waldenmeier, , ‘Antichristentum’, p. 250Google Scholar.

19 Unruh, Benjamin, ‘Der Bolschewismus und die Christuskirche’, Die Furche (1931), pp. 274, 277, 285Google Scholar.

20 Besier, G. and Sauter, G., Wit Christen ihre Schuld bekennen (Göttingen, 1985), pp. 32–3Google Scholar.

21 Barth, , The Germans and Ourselves, pp. 29, 33Google Scholar.

22 Vogel, , Grace, pp. 41, 43–4Google Scholar.

23 Ehlers, H., ‘Die Frage nach dem Recht vor der Betheler Synode’, Junge Kirche (1949), pp. 73–9Google Scholar; Wolf, E., Sozialethik (Göttingen, 1988), p. 11Google Scholar.

24 Heidtmann, G., ed., Hat die Kirche geschwiegen? (Berlin, 1964), pp. 33–5Google Scholar; Klappert, B., ‘Die ökumenische Bedeutung des Darmstädter Wortes’, Richte unsere Füssen auf den Weg des Friedens (Munich, 1979), pp. 632, 640Google Scholar; Bethge, E., ‘Geschichtliche Schuld der Kirche’, in Herbert, K., ed., Christliche Freiheit im Dienst am Menschen (Frankfurt am Main, 1972), pp. 123–4Google Scholar; Marquardt, , ‘Solidaritat…’, p. 393Google Scholar.

25 Adler, E., ed., Pro-Existence (London, 1964), pp. 11–13; 36Google Scholar.

26 Vogel, , ‘Die christliclie Solidarität…’)1960), p. 684Google Scholar.

27 Ward, W. R., Theology, Sociology and Politics: The Protestant Social Conscience 1890–1933 (Bern, 1979), p. 216Google Scholar.