No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2016
Some time in 1608, there arrived at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge a distinguished foreign visitor who, through the good offices of the Chancellor of the University, Robert Cecil, earl of Salisbury, and of Merlin Higden, a Fellow of Corpus, had been given permission to examine a manuscript in the college library. The visiting scholar had secured access to the library through a network of contacts that included his friend, a naturalized Frenchman and diplomat working for Cecil, Sir Stephen Lesieur, and a Chiswick clergyman, William Walter. What makes this apparently unremarkable (and hitherto unremarked) incident of more than trivial interest is that the industrious researcher was Jacques Bongars, veteran roving French ambassador in Germany and staunch Calvinist, and that his text was William of Tyre’s Historia Ierosolymitana.
1 MS letter of William Walter, minister of Chiswick, pasted into the Bodleian Library, Oxford copy of the Gesta Dei Per Francos E.2.8. Art Seld. after foL 6; cf. Gesta Dei Per Francos (Hanau, rtìir), Contents item n where Bongars thanks Higden and Lesieur, although not Walter. For Lesieur’s contacts with Cecil, Historical Manuscripts Commission, Third Report (London, 1872), pp. 172, 175 (letters of 1607 and 1609); there are numerous other examples of the Lesieur correspondence in the Cecil papers.
2 Cambridge, Corpus Christi College MS 95; James, M. R., Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge (Cambridge, 1911-12), pp. xxxiv, 182–3.Google Scholar
3 In general, Setton, K., The Papacy and the Levant, 4 vols (Philadelphia, 1976-84), 2–4Google Scholar; Housley, N., The Later Crusades (Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar, esp. ch. 4; Schwoebel, R., The Shadow of the Crescent- The Renaissance Image of the Turk (Nieukoop, 1967).Google Scholar
4 Fischer-Galati, A., Ottoman Imperialism and German Protestantism (Harvard, 1959), pp. 17–18Google Scholar; Housley, , Later Crusades, p. 380Google Scholar; Bohnstedt, J. W., The Infidel Scourge of God: The Turkish Menace as seen by pamphleteers of the Reformation Era, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (Philadelphia, 1978), pp. 12, 14, 20, 32, 46–51Google Scholar; Heath, M.J., Crusading Commonplaces: La Noue, Lucinge and Rhetoric (Geneva, 1986), p. 15Google Scholar. Cf. Luther’s original stance attacked in the papal bull Exurge Domine (1520) with his later thoughts, Vom Kriege widder die Turken (1529) and the Exhortation (1541); on the impact of these changes, Heath, M J., ‘Erasmus and war against the Turks’, Acta Conventus neo-Latini Turonensis, ed. Margolin, J.-C (Paris, 1980), pp. 991–9Google Scholar. Pannier, J., ‘Calvin et les Turcs’, RH, 180 (1937), pp. 268–72.Google Scholar
5 Housley, , Later Crusades, esp. pp. 99–100, 380, 383–8, 390–1, 393, 398, 409Google Scholar; Black, R., Benedetto Accolti and the Florentine Renaissance (Cambridge, 1985), esp. pp. 226–40Google Scholar; idem, ‘La storica della Prime Crociata di Benedetto Accolti’, ASI, 131 (1973), pp. 2–25; see also the general books cited in a 4 above and Atiya, A. S., The Crusade in the Later Middle Ages (London, 1938), chs 9, 11 and 19.Google Scholar
6 Schwoebel, , Shadow of the Crescent, p. 223.Google Scholar
7 Setton, , Papacy and Levant, 3 & 4, chs 12, 13 and 18Google Scholar; Housley, , Later Crusades, pp. 312–15, 410–20.Google Scholar
8 Tanner, , Decrees, pp. 609–14Google Scholar (Postquam ad universalis of 1514), 651–4 (Constitutio iuxta verbum of 1517). Settori, K., ‘Leo X and the Turkish peril’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 113 (1969), pp. 367–424.Google Scholar
9 Bohnstedt, , Infidel Scourge, pp. 14, 34–5, 41–6.Google Scholar
10 Naz, R., ed., Dictionnaire de droit canonique, 4 (Paris, 1949), col. 781, and note 7Google Scholar above.
11 Bohnstedt, , Infidel Scourge, pp. 43–4Google Scholar, where Kretz talked of martyrdom but not indulgences; Heath, , Crusading Commonplaces, pp. 10, 24, 88.Google Scholar
12 Cf.Heath, , Crusading Commonplaces, pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
13 Spedding, J. et al, eds, The Works of Francis Bacon, 7 (London, 1859), p. 4.Google Scholar
14 Schwoebel, , Shadow of the Crescent, p. 217Google Scholar; Settori, , Papacy and Levant, 3, pp. 179, n. 28, 89–90, n. 72Google Scholar; Fischer-Galati, , Ottoman Imperialism, esp. pp. 9–10Google Scholar; Heath, Crusading Commonplaces.
15 Lepanto, J. Craigie, ed., The Poems of James VI of Scotland, 1 (Edinburgh, 1955). Pp. 198 and, in full, 197–257.
16 Baumer, F. L., ‘England, the Turk and the Common Corps of Christendom’, AHR, 50 (1944-5), pp. 26–48, esp. 31, 36–8, 43–7Google Scholar; Tyerman, C.J., England and the Crusades 1095–1588 (Chicago, 1988), pp. 348–50.Google Scholar
17 Wolter, H., ‘Elements of Crusade spirituality in St. Ignatius’, Ignatius of Loyola: His Personality and Spiritual Heritage, ed. Wulf, F. (St Louis, MO, 1977), pp. 97–134Google Scholar; Tanner, N. P., ‘Medieval Crusade decrees and Ignatus’s Meditation on the Kingdom’, Heythrop Journal, 31 (1990), pp. 505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Vitry, Jacques de, Historia Orientalis, ed. Moschus, F. (Douai, 1597)Google Scholar, Preface to Reader.
19 Foxe, J., Acts and Monuments, ed. Cattley, S. R. (London, 1837-41), 4, pp. 18–21, 27–8, 33–4. 38, 52–4, 69, 113, 120–1.Google Scholar
20 Reinerius Reineccius Steinheraius, Chronicon Hierosolymitanum (Helmstadt, 1584) (Part 2 [1585] contains Dresser’s Commentary); idem, Liber Epistolarum Historicarum, pp. 44, 60 for correspondence between Dresser and Reineck in 1583.
21 Chronicon Hierosolymitanum, 2, fol. 2v.
22 Chronicon Hierosolymitanum, 2, fols. Ir-7v.
23 Ibid., 2, fol. 7r.
24 Ibid., 1, Introduction; bis main publishing activities of texts date from the last fifteen years of his life, while he had made his reputation as a scholar of, in particular, Ancient Greece at Wittenberg and Leipzig in the 1570s.
25 Lothholz, G. E., Commentatio de Bongarsio Singulisque eius aequaltbus (Leipzig, 1857), pp. 4–14Google Scholar; Anquez, L, Henri IV et l’Allemagne (Paris, 1887), pp. xiii–lxxxviGoogle Scholar, Jacques Bongars’, for the biographical details and academic influences based on Bongars’ extensive cor respondence.
26 Anquez, , Henri W et l’Allemagne, pp. xli–xlii.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., p. xv, in a letter to the Landgrave of Hesse; p. xx for his description of himself in 1587 as a pilgrim to Constantinople.
28 Anqucz, , Henri IV et l’Allemagne, p. xxiGoogle Scholar; Lothholz, , Commentatio, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
29 See the introduction to the table of contents of Cesta Dei Per Francos, 1.
30 Anquez, , Henri IV et l’Allemagne, p. lxvGoogle Scholar, according to a letter dated 21 March 1611.
31 Vatican Codex Reginae Cristinae 548.
32 Walter’s letter at fol. 6, Bodleian Library copy of Gesta Dei Per Francos, E.2.8. Art Seld.
33 Dedication to Gesta Dei Per Francos, 2.
34 ‘Periculosissimis ita gloriosissima expeditionibus’, from the dedicatory Preface to Part i.
35 In the author’s Preface to Part i.
36 Pannier, , ‘Calvin et les Turcs’, pp. 278–86.Google Scholar
37 Heath, , Crusading Commonplaces, pp. 10, 53, 84, 103–4Google Scholar; for the family relationship, Anquez, , Henri W et l’Allemagne, p. xliv.Google Scholar
38 Heath, , Crusading Commonplaces, pp. 13, 39, 49, 66, 74.Google Scholar
39 For the most comprehensive study, Pierre Dubois, The Recovery of the Holy Land, trans. W. I. Brandt, Introduction, pp. 3–65; pp. 69–198 for the text.
40 Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation, 2nd edn (London, 1989), p. 317.Google Scholar
41 Dubois, , The Recovery, trans. Brandt, pp. 167–98Google Scholar; Piane, M. della, Vecchio e Nuovo nelle idee politiche di Pietro Dubois (Florence, 1959), pp. 106–43.Google Scholar
42 On fourteenth-century critics, Siberry, E., ‘Criticism of crusading in fourteenth- century England’ and Tyerman, C. J., ‘The Holy Land and the Crusades of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries’, Crusade and Settlement, ed. Edbury, P. W. (Cardiff, 1985), pp. 127- 34 and 105–12Google Scholar; Luttrell, A., ‘Chaucer’s Knight and the Mediterranean’, Library of Mediterranean History, 1 (1994), pp. 127–60Google Scholar; Tyerman, C. J., The Invention of the Crusades (London, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 On a personal, tiny, and random sample there exist or existed until recently two copies in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, and copies in the college libraries of New College, Queen’s and All Souls’; there was also a copy at Castle Howard.
44 Bourdeille, Pierre de, Brantôme, seigneur de, Oeuvres complètes, ed. Lalanne, L., 9 (Paris, 1876), pp. 433–4. 450.Google Scholar
45 Works of Francis Bacon, 7, p. 24 and, generally, pp. 1–36 for the Advertisement.
46 Leff, , Medieval Thought, p. 86.Google Scholar