Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:01:24.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Peter K. Enns  and
Julianna Koch
Peter K. Enns*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Julianna Koch
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
Peter K. Enns, Cornell University, 214 White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we create, validate, and analyze new dynamic measures of state partisanship, state policy mood, and state political ideology. The measures of partisanship and policy mood begin in 1956 and the measure of ideology begins in 1976. Our approach uses the advantages of two leading techniques for measuring state public opinion—multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) and survey aggregation. The resulting estimates are based on nearly 500 different surveys with a total of more than 740,000 respondents. After validating our measures, we show that during the last half century, policy preferences in the states have shifted in important and sometimes surprising ways. For example, we find that differences in political attitudes across time can be as important as differences across states.

Keywords

issue preferencespublic opinionvoting behaviorpolitical behaviorsurvey researchmethodologyideology
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 349 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102(2): 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000.” Election Law Journal 1(3): 315–38.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2004. “Redistricting: Case Law and Consequences.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153(1): 433–57.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Boef, Suzanna De, and Boydstun, Amber E.. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Fording, Richard C., Ringquist, Evan J., Hanson, Russell L., and Klarner, Carl E.. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2): 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen Ideology and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 2007. “The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 111–32.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul R., Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, and Ulbig, Stacy G.. 2004. “Does State Political Ideology Change over Time?” Political Research Quarterly 57(4): 529–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul R., and Boyea, Brent. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul R., and Hall, Melinda G.. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59:1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul R., Sims-Butler, Kellie, Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Harden, Jeffrey J.. 2010. “New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2): 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, Christopher J., Enns, Peter K., and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R. 2010. “Why the New Deal Still Matters: Public Preferences, Elite Context, and American Mass Party Change, 1974–2006.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 20(1): 103–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R., and Stimson, James A.. 2009. “Symbolic Ideology in the American Electorate.” Electoral Studies 28:388–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R., and Stimson, James A.. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R., Ura, Joseph D., and Robinson, Jenna A.. 2006. “The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 59(2): 227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, Peter K. 2010. “The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States.” Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. Accessed July 18, 2013 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1642977Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 433–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Group Opinion and the Study of Representation.” In Who Gets Represented? eds. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2013. “The Swing Justice.” Journal of Politics 75(4): Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey E.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 229–53.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 2007. “Measuring the Public's Ideological Preferences in the 50 States: Survey Responses versus Roll Call Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Scarrow, Howard A.. 1985. “Party Identification and Party Enrollment: The Difference and the Consequences.” Journal of Politics 47:620–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James. 2005. “Dynamic Responsiveness in the U.S. Senate.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Park, David, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, and Cortina, Jeronimo. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., and Ward, Bryce A.. 2006. “Myths and Realities of American Political Geography.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1991. “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black Representation in Southern Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16(1): 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, David A., and Stoker, Laura. 2011. “The Political Geography of Party Resurgence.” In Who Gets Represented? eds. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christohper. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 93–128.Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G., and Schneider, Saundra K.. 2001. “Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63(2): 544–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G., and Schneider, Saundra K.. 2009. “A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States.” Political Analysis 17(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P., Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Estimating State Public Opinion Using Multi-level Regression and Poststratification Using R.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P., Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2010. “Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 767–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellstedt, Paul M. 2003. The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J., and Enns, Peter K.. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 855–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J., and Witko, Christopher. 2012. “Federalism and American Inequality.” Journal of Politics 74(4): 414–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura, and Brace, Paul. 2005. “The Preemptive Power of State Supreme Courts: Adoption of Abortion and Death Penalty Legislation.” Policy Studies Journal 33(3): 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103:367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science 53:107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83:1125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAvoy, Gregory E., and Enns, Peter K.. 2010. “Using Approval of the President's Handling of the Economy to Understand Who Polarizes and Why.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40:545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1988. “Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One Man, One Vote Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 388–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T., and Stimson, James A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1018–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinke, Scott R., and Hasecke, Edward B.. 2003. “Term Limits, Professionalization, and Partisan Control in U.S. State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 65(3): 898–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monogan, James, Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2009. “Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noninitiative U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9(3): 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1): 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(4): 415–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis 12:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2006. “State-Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Multilevel Logistic Regression.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 209–228.Google Scholar
Parry, Janine A., Kisida, Brian, and Langley, Ronald E.. 2008. “The State of State Polls: Old Challenges, New Opportunities.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8(2): 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola, Abelson, Robert P., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 1965. Candidates, Issues, and Strategies: A Computer Simulation of the 1960 Presidential Election. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe, Schram, Sanford F., Vartanian, Thomas P., and O'Brien, Erin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, Christopher, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?” Journal of Politics 74(1): 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Ronald E., Hopkins, Anne H., Mezey, Michael L., and Munger, Frank J.. 1972. “Computer Simulation of State Electorates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(4): 549–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald, Erikson, Robert S., and McIver, John P.. 1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology Using Survey Data.” Journal of Politics 47(2): 469–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum