Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:18:19.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Paul Brace ,
Melinda Gann Hall  and
Laura Langer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay places state supreme courts in state politics by tracking some of the major lines of research on these important institutions, documenting the importance of state supreme courts, and illustrating important variations among state supreme courts on a host of factors, including docket composition, the exercise of judicial review, litigant patterns, and turnover rates. Through analyses of original data on separation-of-powers relationships in the abortion controversy, it also provides a brief empirical demonstration of how courts influence and are influenced by the political and policy processes operating in the states, and how comparative research helps resolve fundamental controversies in political science. We conclude that there is a remarkable and unfortunate asymmetry between the political importance of state supreme courts and the attention given to them by the research community. Moreover, by capitalizing on the analytical advantages of comparative state judicial politics scholarship, scholars will be able to solve some of the most complex puzzles in the study of state politics.

Type
Field Essay
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 81 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Burton M., and Glick, Henry R. 1974. “Formal Judicial Recruitment and State Supreme Court Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 2: 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Burton M., and Glick, Henry R. 1976. “Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Douglas G., Gertner, Robert H., and Picker, Randal C. 1994. Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1977. “Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1979. “Judicial Demand-Screening and Decisions on the Merits.” American Politics Quarterly 7: 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1987. “Explaining the Vote in Judicial Elections: The 1984 Ohio Supreme Court Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 40: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1993. “Making Judicial Policies in the Political Arena.” In The State of the States, ed. Van Horn, Carl E. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1994. “Selection Effects and Judicial Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Edward N. 1974. “The Rhode Island Supreme Court: A Well-Integrated Political System.” Law and Society Review 8: 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Robert, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1995. “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Offensive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vincent Court.” Journal of Politics 57: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S. 1997. “Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1414–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S. N.d. Timing and Political Change: Event History Modeling in Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Neoinstitutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 52: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” Journal of Politics 55: 914–935.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Structure in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59: 1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Comparing Courts Using the American States.” Judicature 83 (March-April): 250–266.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Hall, Melinda Gann, and Langer, Laura. 1999. “Judicial Choice and the Politics of Abortion: Institutions, Context, and the Autonomy of Courts.” Albany Law Review 62: 1265–1302.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Jewett, Aubrey. 1995. “The State of State Politics Research.” Political Research Quarterly 48: 643–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Justices.” Journal of Politics 62: 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Bradley, and Sidney Ulmer, S. 1980. “An Examination of Voting Behavior in the Supreme Court of Illinois: 1971-1975.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 1980: 245–262.Google Scholar
Brenner, Saul. 1979. “The New Certiorari Game.” Journal of Politics 41: 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts.” Political Behavior 5: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts.” American Political Science Review 79: 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1972. “The Impact of Formal Selection Processes on the Characteristics of Judges—Reconsidered.” Law and Society Review 13: 570–593.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1973. “Reactions of State Supreme Courts to a U.S. Supreme Court Civil Liberties Decision.” Law and Society Review 8: 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Baum, Lawrence. 1981. “Patterns of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines.” American Political Science Review 75: 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Jaros, Dean. 1970. “External Variables, Institutional Structure and Dissent on State Supreme Courts.” Polity 4: 185–200.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E., and Barrilleaux, Charles. 1993. “Public Opinion, Interest Groups, and Public Policy Making: Abortion Policy in the American States.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm L. Newbury Park, California: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. “Issue Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: Abortion and Post-Webster Politics.” Journal of Politics 56: 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Barbara Hinkson, and O'Brien, David M. 1993. Abortion and American Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Croley, P. Steven. 1995. “The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 62: 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, John H., and Wold, John T. 1986. “Bird, Rose and the Politics of Judicial Accountability in California.” Judicature 70 (August-September): 81–9.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decisionmaking in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.Google Scholar
Dubois, Philip L. 1980. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Philip L. 1988. “The Illusion of Judicial Consensus Revisited: Partisan Conflict on an Intermediate State Court of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmert, Craig F. 1992. “An Integrated Case-Related Model of Judicial Decision-Making: Explaining State Supreme Court Decisions in Judicial Review Cases.” Journal of Politics 54: 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmert, Craig F., and Traut, Carol Ann. 1994. “The California Supreme Court and the Death Penalty.” American Politics Quarterly 22: 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 101: 331–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Daryl R. 1967. “An Experimental Application of Scalogram Analysis to State Supreme Court Decisions.” Wisconsin Law Review 1967: 449–459.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles R. 1990 “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., and Dan Wood, B. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 468–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank and United States. 1999. 527 U.S. 627.Google Scholar
Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo T. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Decision Making with Application to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 6: 263–300.Google Scholar
Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo T. 1992. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions: The Case of Roosevelt's Court-Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics 12: 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R. 1991. “The Right-to-Die: State Policy-Making and the Elderly.” Journal of Aging Studies 5: 283–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, Henry R., and Emmert, Craig F. 1987. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics: The Recruitment of State Supreme Court Judges.” Judicature 70 (December-January): 228–235.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Vines, Kenneth N. 1969. “Law-Making in the State Judiciary: A Comparative Study of the Judicial Role in Four States.” Polity 2: 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Vines, Kenneth N. 1973. State Court Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goggin, Malcolm L., and Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “Abortion Opinion and Policy in the American States.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm L. Newbury Park, CA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, Kenyon N., and Horan, Michael J. 1983. “Patterns of Voting Behavior in Judicial Retention Elections for Supreme Court Justices in Wyoming.” Judicature 67 (August): 68–77.Google Scholar
Gryski, Gerard S., Main, Eleanor C., and Dixon, William J. 1986. “Models of State High Court Decision-Making in Sex Discrimination Cases.” Journal of Politics 48: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1985. “Docket Control as an Influence on Judicial Voting.” Justice System Journal 10: 243–255.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49: 1114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature 73 (December-January): 209–214.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54: 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23: 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1999. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: An Examination of the Electoral Vulnerability Hypothesis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1989. “Order in the Courts: A Neo-Institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” Western Political Quarterly 42: 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 20: 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1994. “The Vicissitudes of Death by Decree: Forces Influencing Capital Punishment Decision-Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 75: 136–151.Google Scholar
Halva-Neubauer, Glen. 1993. “The States After Roe: ‘No Paper Tigers’.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm L. Newbury Park, CA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammons, Christopher W. 1999. “Was James Madison Wrong? Rethinking the American Preference for Short, Framework-Oriented Constitutions.” American Political Science Review 93: 837–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handberg, Roger. 1978. “Leadership in State Courts of Last Resort: The Interaction of Environment and Procedure.” Jurimetrics 19: 178–195.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, and Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “Choosing Judicial Candidates: How Voters Explain Their Decisions.” Judicature 75 (April-May): 300–9.Google Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Canon, Bradley C. 1971. “Dissent on State Supreme Courts: The Differential Significance of Characteristics of Judges.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilwein, John C., and Brisbin, Richard A. Jr. 1997. “Policy Convergence in a Federal Judicial System: The Application of Intensified Scrutiny Doctrines by State Supreme Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 122–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimel et. al. v. Florida Board of Regents. 2000. 527 U.S. 1067.Google Scholar
Krol, John F., and Brenner, Saul. 1990. “Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court: A Reevaluation.” Western Political Quarterly 43: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura. 1997. “State Supreme Courts and Countermajoritarian Behavior: Strategic or Sincere?” Paper presented at the Conference of the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 1999. “Internal Procedures and External Constraints Encouraging Strategic Behavior on State Courts of Last Resort.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Lovrich, Nicholas P. Jr., and Sheldon, Charles H. 1984. “Voters in Judicial Elections: An Attentive Public or An Uninformed Electorate.” Justice System Journal 9: 23–39.Google Scholar
Lovrich, Nicholas P. Jr., and Sheldon, Charles H. 1985. “Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects Upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems.” Western Political Quarterly 38: 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McConkie, Stanford S. 1976. “Decision-Making in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature 59 (February): 337–343.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry W. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 243–277.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry W. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75: 431–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, and Ignagni, Joseph. 1997. “Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and McFarlane, Deborah R. 1993. “The Politics of Funding Abortion: State Responses to the Political Environment.” American Politics Quarterly 21: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Politics 58: 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1995. “Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Stuart. 1961. “Political Party Affiliation and Judges' Decisions.” American Political Science Review 55: 843–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government Pac. 2000. 120 S. Ct. 897.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27: 707–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, Karen. 1996. No Neutral Ground? : Abortion Politics in an Age of Absolutes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Jan. 1982. “An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” Public Choice 39: 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Dorris Marie 1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board. 2000. 120 S. Ct. 866.Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1992. “Purposive Politicians Meet the Institutional Congress: A Review Essay.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 959.Google Scholar
Romans, Neil T. 1974. “The Role of State Supreme Courts in Judicial Policy Making: Escobedo, Miranda, and the Use of Judicial Impact Analysis.” Western Political Quarterly 27: 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1995. “The Real World of Constitutional Rights: The Supreme Court and the Implementation of Abortion Decisions.” In Contemplating Courts, ed. Epstein, Lee. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M. III, Ungs, Thomas D., and Hayes, Allison L. 1989. “Judicial Role Orientation, Attitudes, and Decision-Making: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 42: 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon A. 1959. Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon A. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91: 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida. 1996. 517 U.S. 44.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Charles H., and Maule, Linda S. 1997. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R. 1997. Designing Judicial Review: Interest Groups, Congress, and Communications Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sickels, Robert J. 1965. “The Illusion of Judicial Consensus: Zoning Decisions in the Maryland Court of Appeals.” American Political Science Review 59: 100–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E. 1977. “Who Speaks for the Court: The View from the States.” Emory Law Journal 26: 107–147.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Tabrizi, Susan J. 1999. “The Religious Right in Court: The Decision Making of Christian Evangelicals in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 61: 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988.” RAND Journal of Economics 23: 463–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarr, G. Alan. 1977. Judicial Impact and State Supreme Courts. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Tarr, G. Alan, and Porter, Mary Cornelia Aldis. 1988. State Supreme Courts in State and Nation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Traut, Carol Ann, and Emmert, Craig F. 1998. “Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making: The California Justices and Capital Punishment.” Journal of Politics 60: 1166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1962. “The Political Party Variable in the Michigan Supreme Court.” Journal of Public Law 11: 352–362.Google Scholar
Wold, John T. 1978. “Going Through Motions: Monotony of Appellate Court Decisionmaking.” Judicature 62 (August-September): 58–65.Google Scholar