Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:18:19.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislative Professionalism and the Power of State House Leaders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Richard A. Clucas
Richard A. Clucas*
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What effect does the professional character of a legislature have on the power of its legislative leaders? Despite legislative scholars' desire to better understand both institutional professionalism and leadership power, few empirical studies have explored the relationship between these two important elements of American state legislatures. Moreover, of the research that has been conducted, little effort has been made to understand the impact of professionalism on leadership from a theoretical perspective. This article expands our understanding of legislative professionalism and leadership while testing three theoretical models of legislative organization. I examine the effect of professionalism and several control variables on the influence of state house leaders in 38 non-southern states in 1981 and 1995. Contrary to the fears of some analysts, I find that more professional state legislatures tend to have more powerful leaders. These results provide support for a partisan model of legislative organization.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyle, Thad L. 2003. “Gubernatorial Power: The Institutional Power Ratings for the 50 Governors of the United States.” University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Brady, David. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policymaking. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clucas, Richard A. 1995. The Speaker's Electoral Connection: Willie Brown and the California Assembly. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Clucas, Richard A. 2001. “Principal-Agent Theory and the Power of State House Speakers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26:319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collie, Melissa P. 1994. “Legislative Structure and Its Effects.” In Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System, ed. Silbey, Joel H.. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75:397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of State Governments. Various years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1984. American Federalism: A View from the States. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Elections Research Center. Various years. America Votes. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence. 1999. “Legislative Structure: Rules, Precedents, and Jurisdictions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24:605–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Wayne L. 1985. “Leadership, Party Caucuses, and Committees in U. S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Wayne. 1989. The Legislative Committee Game. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Gierzynski, Anthony, and Jewell, Malcolm. 1992. “Legislative Caucus and Campaign Committees.” In Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers, eds. Moncrief, Gary and Thompson, Joel. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hamm, Keith E., and Harmel, Robert. 1993. “Legislative Party Development and the Speaker System: The Case of the Texas House.” Journal of Politics 55:1140–51.Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert, and Hamm, Keith E.. 1986. “Development of a Party Role in a No-Party Legislature.” Western Political Quarterly 39:79–92.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Dunk, Emily Van. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review 87:955–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Whicker, Marcia Lynn. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
King, James D. 2000. “Changes in Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, H.W. Jerome. 2005. “The Institutional Implications of Outside Careers: Delegation, Legislator Goals, and Leadership Power.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:663–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Thompson, Joel A., and Kurtz, Karl T.. 1996. “The Old Statehouse, It Ain't What It Used to Be.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21:57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, William. 1992. “State Legislative Careers: Twenty-Five Years of Reform.” In Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers, eds. Moncrief, Gary and Thompson, Joel. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1969. Majority Party Leadership in Congress. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rohde, David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1989. “The Legislative Institution: In Transition and at Risk.” In The State of the States, ed. Horn, Carl Van. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1996. “State Legislative Development: Observations from Three Perspectives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21:169–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1994. “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. “Purposive Behavior in the U.S. Congress: A Review Essay.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2000. “Positive Theories of Congressional Parties.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1988. “Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13:65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 1995. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar