Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T21:42:44.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ideological and Electoral Determinants of Laws Targeting Undocumented Migrants in the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Joshua N. Zingher
Joshua N. Zingher*
Affiliation:
Binghamton University–State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA
*
Joshua N. Zingher, Department of Political Science, Binghamton University–State University of New York, P.O. Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

State legislatures have been extremely active in passing legislation relating to all facets of immigration policy over the last several years. In this article, I develop a framework that explains how party ideology, party control of the legislature, and electoral conditions affect the likelihood that a state legislature will adopt policies that increase immigration enforcement. I test my arguments using state immigration policy adoption data that span from 2005 to 2011. I find that conservative Republican state parties are more likely to pass legislation enhancing immigration enforcement—on the condition that the Republican Party controls the state's legislative institutions. However, the willingness of Republican-controlled legislatures to pass immigration reform is often tempered by electoral concerns. Republican-controlled legislatures in states where Latinos make up a large proportion of the electorate are significantly less likely to adopt new legislation that targets undocumented migrants. I argue that Republican support for increasing sanctions on undocumented migrants is eroded by the potential for an electoral backlash from Latino voters. Democratic-controlled legislatures are unlikely to pass legislation under any conditions. Ultimately, the observed pattern of policy adoption is the product of the trade-off between the state parties' ideologically driven policy goals and the electoral consequences associated with actually implementing immigration policies.

Keywords

political partiesparties and interest groupsimmigration policypublic policylegislative behaviorlegislative politicsethnic politicsidentity/group politicsHispanic/Latino politics
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 90 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barreto, M. A., and Woods, N.. 2005. “Latino Voting Behavior in an Anti-Latino Political Context.” In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, eds. Bowler, Shaun and Segura, Gary M.. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 148–69.Google Scholar
Bowler, S., Nicholson, S., and Segura, G.. 2006. “Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy, and Partisan Change.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 146–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., and Golder, M.. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P., and Gimpel, J.. 2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 115(2): 210–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, T., and Harden, J.. 2010. “New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology and Policy Mood in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2): 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, J. M., and Provine, D. M.. 2009. “Race and the Response of State Legislatures to Unauthorized Immigrants.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 623:78–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Citrin, J., Green, D. P., Muste, C., and Wong, C.. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics 59(3): 858–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J., Lerman, A., Murakami, M., and Pearson, K.. 2007. “Testing Huntington: Is Hispanic Immigration a Threat to American Identity?” Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J., Reingold, B., Walters, E., and Green, D. P.. 1990. “The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States.” The Western Political Quarterly 43(3): 535–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortez, N. G. 2008. “The Local Dilemma: Preemption and the Role of Federal Standards in State and Local Immigration Law.” Southern Methodist University Law Review 67:47–66.Google Scholar
Cox, G., Kousser, T., and McCubbins, M.. 2010. “Party Power or Preferences? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from American State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G., and McCubbins, M.. 2003. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. 2nd ed. New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Cox, G., and McCubbins, M.. 2004. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Creek, H., and Yoder, S.. 2012. “With a Little Help from Our Feds: Understanding State Immigration Enforcement Policy Adoption in American Federalism.” Policy Studies Journal 40(4): 674–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, R. 2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R. 2011. “Acceptable and Unacceptable Immigrants: How Opposition to Immigration in Britain Is Affected by Migrants' Region of Origin.” The Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(7): 1017–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, R. 1995. “Critical Race Theory and Proposition 187: The Racial Politics of Immigration Law.” Scholarly Works Paper 662. http://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/662 (accessed February 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. 2008. Econometric Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hero, R., and Preuhs, R.. 2007. “Immigration and the Evolving American Welfare State: Examining Policies in the U.S. States.” American Journal of Political Science 51(3): 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. V., and Morris, I.. 1997. “Amigo o Enemigo? Context, Attitudes and Anglo Public Opinion towards Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78(2): 309–23.Google Scholar
Hood, M. V., and Morris, I.. 1998. “Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor ... But Make Sure They Have a Green Card: The Effects of Documented and Undocumented Migrant Context on Anglo Opinion toward Immigration.” Political Behavior 20(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. 2010. “Politicized Places: When and Where Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. 2011. “National Debates, Local Responses: The Origins of Local Concern about Immigration in Britain and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science, 41(3): 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Gyung-Ho, Miller, G., Schofield, C., and Sened, I.. 2011. “Cracks in the Opposition: Immigration as a Wedge Issue for the Reagan Coalition.” American Political Science Review 55(3): 511–25.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk.” Econometrica 74(2): 263–92.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
National Council of State Legislatures. 2013. “Immigration Enactments Database.” http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?TabId=19209 (accessed February 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Newman, B. 2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 374–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, B., and Johnson, J.. 2012. “Ethnic Change, Concern over Immigration, and Approval of State Government.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12(4): 415–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, B., Johnston, C., Strickland, A., and Citrin, J.. 2012. “Immigration Crackdown in the American Workplace: Explaining Variation in E-Verify Policy Adoption across the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12(2): 160–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A., Ramirez, R., and Segura, G.. 2001. “Citizens by Choice, Voters by Necessity: Patterns in Political Mobilization by Naturalized Latinos.” Political Research Quarterly 54(4): 729–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A., and Segura, G.. 2003. “Fear and Loathing in California: Contextual Threat and Political Sophistication among Latino Voters.” Political Behavior 25(3): 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, R. 2007. “Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash Latino Incorporation and Welfare Policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 60(2): 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G., Krasno, J., Zingher, J., and Allen, M.. 2013. “The Partisan Fallout from Arizona's Immigration Battle: Applying Lessons from California.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160760 (accessed February 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Scheve, K., and Slaughter, M.. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(1): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, B., and McCarty, N.. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, P. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, D. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, C., and Grummel, J.. 2003. “Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis: White Voter Support for California's Proposition 209.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(2): 183–202.Google Scholar
Tolbert, C., and Hero, R.. 1996. “Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative.” Journal of Politics 58(3): 808–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar