No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How the American Public Perceived Electoral Competition in the States during the Pre-poll Era: A Prediction Market Data Analysis of the 1896 Presidential Election
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2022
Abstract
This study uses prediction market data from the nation’s historical election betting markets to measure electoral competition in the American states during the era before the advent of scientific polling. Betting odds data capture ex ante expectations of electoral closeness in the aggregate, and as such improve upon existing measures of competition based on election returns data. Situated in an analysis of the 1896 presidential election and its associated realignment, I argue that the market odds data show that people were able to anticipate the realignment and that expectations on the outcome in the states influenced voter turnout. Findings show that a month ahead of the election betting markets accurately forecast a McKinley victory in most states. This study further demonstrates that the market predictions identify those states where electoral competition would increase or decline that year and the consequences of these expected partisanship shifts on turnout. In places where the anticipation was for a close race voter expectations account for a turnout increase of as much as 6%. Participation dropped by 1%–6% in states perceived as becoming electorally uncompetitive. The results support the conversion and dealignment theories from the realignment literature.
Keywords
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press and State Politics & Policy Quarterly
References
References
Azari, Julia, and Hetherington, Marc J. 2016. “Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election.” Annals, AAPSS 667: 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, Pamela, Rouirnaies, Alexander, Hall, Andrew B., and Synder, James M.. 2019. “How Newspapers Reveal Political Power.” Political Science Research and Methods 7 (4): 661–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensel, Richard Franklin. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2009. Dynamics of American Political Parties. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buggle, Johannes C., and Vlachos, Stephanos. 2020. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Campaign Speeches: Evidence from the First National Speaking Tour.” Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d’économie 20.05.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review 59 (1): 7–28.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1974. “Theory and Voting Research: Some Reflections on Converse’s ‘Change in the American Electorate’.” American Political Science Review 68 (3): 1002–23.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1974. “Comment on Burnham’s ‘Theory on Voting Research’.” American Political Science Review 68 (3): 1024–27.Google Scholar
Darmofal, David, and Nardulli, Peter F.. 2010. “The Dynamics of Critical Realignments: An Analysis Across Time and Space.” Political Behavior 32: 255–83.Google Scholar
David, Paul T. 1972. “How can an Index of Party Competition Best be Derived?” The Journal of Politics 2 (34): 632–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erie, Steven P. 1988. Rainbow’s End Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 2016. “Congressional Elections in Presidential Years: Presidential Coattails and Strategic Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 551–74.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “Are Political Markets Really Superior to Polls as Election Predictors?” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012. “Markets vs. Polls as Election Predictors: An Historical Assessment.” Electoral Studies 31: 532–9.Google Scholar
Foster, Carroll B. 1984. “The Performance of Rational Voter Models in Recent Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 78(3): 678–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Curtis, and Mulling, Matthew. 2011. Voter Turnout in the United States, 1788–2009. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geer, John G. 1991. “Critical Realignments and the Public Opinion Poll.” The Journal of Politics 53 (2): 434–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2014. “The Twentieth-Century Reversal: How Did the Republican States Switch to the Democrats and Vice Versa?” Statistics and Public Policy 1 (1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geys, Benny. 2005. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research.” Electoral Studies 25: 637–63.Google Scholar
Graham, A.A. 1913. “Government by the People an Illusion.” Railway Carmen’s Journal 18: 426.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Shickler, Eric. 1998. “Macropartisanship: A Replication and Critique.” American Political Science Review 93: 883–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Shickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, David, and McKee, Seth C.. 2005. “The Electoral College, Mobilization, and Turnout in the 2000 Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 33 (5): 700–25.Google Scholar
Jensen, Richard. 1986. “The Changing Shape of Burnham’s Political Universe.” Social Science History 10 (3): 209–19.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” The Journal of Politics 17 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” The Journal of Politics 21: 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83: 1125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1998. “What Moves Macropartisanship? A Response to Green, Palmquist, and Schickler.” The American Political Science Review 92 (4): 901–12.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2000. “Electoral Realignments.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 449–74.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F. 1995. “The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political Change.” The American Political Science Review 89(1): 10–22.Google Scholar
Neiheisel, Jacob R. 2016. “Reconciling Legal-Institutional and Behavioral Perspectives on Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from Pennsylvania, 1876–1948.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16 (4): 432–54.Google Scholar
Parry, Janine, Dowdle, Andrew J., Long, Abigail B., and Kloss, Jessica R. 2022. “The Rule, Not the Exception: One-Party Monopolies in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 22: 226–45.Google Scholar
Perez, Vanessa M. 2022. “Replication Data for: How the American Public Perceived Electoral Competition in the States During the Pre-poll Era: A Prediction Market Data Analysis of the 1896 Presidential Election.” UNC Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/X6BYHS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Vanessa M. 2021. “America’s First Voter Identification Laws: The Effects of Personal Registration and Declining Political Party Competition on Presidential Election Turnout, 1880–1916.” Electoral Studies 69: 102263.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, David G. 1967. “The Measurement of Inter-Party Competition and Systemic Stability.” The American Political Science Review, 2 (61): 457–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1965. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. Jacobs, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth N., 45–88. Boston: Little.Google Scholar
Rhode, Paul W., and Strumpf, Koleman S.. 2004. “Historical Presidential Betting Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (Spring): 127–42.Google Scholar
Rhode, Paul W., and Strumpf, Koleman S.. 2013. “The Long History of Political Betting Markets: An International Perspective.” In Siegel in The Oxford Handbook of Economics Gambling, eds. Vaughan-Williams, Lighton and Donald, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G. 1970. “The Effect of the Australian Ballot Reform on Split Ticket Voting: 1876–1908.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1220–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G. 1974. “Comment: The American Electoral Universe: Speculation and Evidence.” American Political Science Review 68 (3): 1028–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G. 2001. A Statistical History of the American Electorate. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G., and Stucker, John J.. 1978. “The Effect of Southern System of Election Laws on Voting Participation: A Reply to V. O. Key, Jr.” In Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allag G., and Flanigan, Willian H. (eds), The History of American Electoral Behavior, 198–250. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., and MacKuen, Michael. 1981. “On the Study of Party Realignment.” The Journal of Politics 43 (2): 523–30.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917. American Politics and Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E 1960. The Semisovereing People: A Realist’s Vew of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., and Silina, Everita. 2005. “THE 1896 Realignment: A Reassessment.” American Politics Research 33 (1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strijbis, Oiver, Arnesen, Sveinung, and Bernhard, Laurent. 2016. “Using Prediction Market Data for Measuring the Expected Closeness in Electoral Research.” Electoral Studies 44: 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Thies, Clifford F. 2018. “The Chicago Record Poll and the Election of 1896.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48: 127–38.Google Scholar
Wall, Matthew, Costello, Rory, and Lindsay, Stephen. 2017. “The Miracle of the Markets: Identifying Key Campaign Events in the Scottish Independence Referendum Using Betting Odds.” Electoral Studies 46: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Gideon. 1912. “Intricacies of this Political Campaign Temptations to Bettor.” The Idaho Daily Statesman.Google Scholar
Baker, Gideon. 1912. “Intricacies of this Political Campaign Temptations to Bettor.” The Idaho Daily Statesman.Google Scholar
Perez supplementary material
Appendix
File
1.3 MB