Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:16:37.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiscal Accountability in Gubernatorial Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jeff Cummins  and
Thomas T. Holyoke
Jeff Cummins*
Affiliation:
California State University, Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA
Thomas T. Holyoke
Affiliation:
California State University, Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA
*
Jeff Cummins, California State University, Fresno, 2225 East San Ramon M/S MF 19, Fresno, CA 93740-8029, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although significant research has been conducted on economic voting in gubernatorial elections, very few explore the impact of state fiscal conditions in these elections. The little that has been done yields conflicting results regarding the effects of state spending and found that governors are not held responsible for a state's overall fiscal health. Our study examines the impact of spending and fiscal health on gubernatorial elections from 1982 to 2013. We find evidence that voters reward incumbent parties for fiscal health and spending growth and that unified government and stronger executive budget powers enhance fiscal accountability for these outcomes. These findings contradict previous research that suggests voters punish one or both parties for higher spending. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for the debate about the balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches.

Keywords

fiscal policygovernorsexecutive politicselectionspolitical behaviorbudgetingaccountability
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 395 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James E., and Rose, Shanna. 2007. “Context-Conditioned Political Business Cycles.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 845–867.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Saving, Jason L.. 1997. “Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (4): 809–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randall W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 (1): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bifulco, Robert, Bunch, Beverly, Duncombe, William, Robbins, Mark, and Simonsen, William. 2012. “Debt and Deception: How States Avoid Making Hard Fiscal Decisions.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Adam R. 2010. “Are Governors Responsible for the State Economy? Partisanship, Blame, and Divided Federalism.” The Journal of Politics 72 (3): 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Sanberg, Joseph Neal Rice. 2003. “Budget Rhetoric in Presidential Campaigns from 1952 to 2000.” Political Behavior 25 (2): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas, and Wright, Gerald C.. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1988. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review 82 (1): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2007. “Presidential Referendum Effects in the 2006 Midterm Elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Jeff. 2009. “Issue Voting and Crime in Gubernatorial Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 90 (3): 632–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dometrius, Nelson C., and Wright, Deil S.. 2010. “Governors, Legislatures, and State Budgets across Time.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 783–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeid, Michael, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2006. “Economic Geography and Economic Voting: Evidence from the US States.” British Journal of Political Science 36:527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faricy, Christopher, and Ellis, Christopher. 2014. “Public Attitudes toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures.” Political Behavior 36:53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, Robert, and Jusko, Karen Long. 2006. “Political-Economic Cycles.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, eds. Weingast, Barry R., and Wittman, Donald. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 545–564.Google Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2011. “A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (2): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16:285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1987. The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2013. “Campaign Spending and Voter Participation in State Legislative Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 94 (3): 840–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1994. “Public Attitudes toward Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Philip G. 2001. “What's So Magical about Five Percent? A Nationwide Look at Factors that Influence the Optimal Size of State Rainy Day Funds.” Public Budgeting & Finance 21 (2): 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2003. “The Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (3): 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kone, Susan L., and Winters, Richard F.. 1993. “Taxes and Voting: Electoral Retribution in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 55 (1): 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2012. “The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Shipan, Charles. 2012. “Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power: A New Approach.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (4): 438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey, and Reilly, Shauna. 2010. “The Electoral Benefits of Distributive Spending.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2012. “Legislative Term Limits and Fiscal Policy Performance.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen A.. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?” Political Research Quarterly 48 (2): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Robert C., Alt, James E., and Ferree, Karen E.. 1998. “Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert. 1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1:19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of State Budget Officers. 2015. Budget Processes in the States. Washington, DC: National Association of State Budget Officers.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., Segura, Gary M., and Woods, Nathan D.. 2002. “Presidential Approval and the Mixed Blessing of Divided Government.” The Journal of Politics 64 (3): 701–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Stanley, Harold W., and Vogel, Ronald J.. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Votes Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Economic Review 77 (2): 293–297.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1992. “Voters as Fiscal Conservatives.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 327–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, James M. 1996. “Balanced-Budget Rules: Budget Institutions and Fiscal Policy in the U.S. States.” American Economic Review 86 (2): 395–400.Google Scholar
Primo, David M., Jacobsmeier, Matthew L., and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (4): 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn. 1998. Vital Statistics on the Presidency. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Kenneth. 1990. “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” American Economic Review 80:21–36.Google Scholar
Rose, Shanna. 2008. “The Political Manipulation of U.S. State Rainy Day Funds under Rules versus Discretion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8 (2): 150–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003. “Institutional Context and the Assignment of Political Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics 65 (1): 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and Citrin, Jack. 1985. Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, Craig J. 1995. “Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: 1982 and 1986.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousser, Thad, and Phillips, Justin H.. 2012. The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, Mark E. 1988. “Have Gubernatorial Elections Become More Distinctive Contests?” The Journal of Politics 50 (1): 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Cummins and Holyoke supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Cummins and Holyoke supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 80.5 KB