Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:32:51.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Democracy and Fiscal Gridlock: Have Voter Initiatives Paralyzed the California Budget?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

John G. Matsusaka*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California

Abstract

Does direct democracy make it impossible to balance public sector budgets? I address this question with evidence from California, where it is widely believed that voter initiatives have paralyzed the state budget process by locking in high spending while simultaneously prohibiting tax increases. A review of all initiatives approved since 1912 shows that no more than 32 percent of appropriations in the 2003-04 California state budget were locked in by initiatives and that initiatives placed only minimal constraints on the legislature's ability to raise revenue. Moreover, it is likely that the legislature would have allocated much of the money to its dedicated purpose even if it had not been required to do so by initiative. Initiatives do not appear to be a significant obstacle to balancing the state budget in California.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelides, Phil. 2003. California at the Fiscal Crossroads: Cutting Our Debt and Building Our Future. Sacramento, CA: California State Treasurer.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., and Noll, Roger G., eds. 1995. Constitutional Reform in California: Making Government More Effective and Responsible. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Government Studies Press.Google Scholar
Cotterell, Bill. 2003. “Petition Process Going Awry?” Tallahassee Democracy, 9 December. http://www.kentucky.com/mld/democrat/news/local/7447094.htm (March 31, 2005).Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40:99128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Peter W., Everingham, Susan S., Chen, Elsa, Abrahamse, Alan F., Merritt, Nancy, and Chiesa, James. 1998. Three Strikes Revisited: An Early Assessment of Implementation and Effects. National Institute of Justice, United States Department of Justice, Document 194106.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Szakaly, Kristin. 1996. “Constitutional Limitations on Borrowing: An Analysis on State Bonded Indebtedness.” American Journal of Political Science 12:6297.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matsusaka, John G.. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7:463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103:587623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John. 2005. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, James M., and Rueben, Kim S.. 1999. Fiscal Rules and State Borrowing Costs: Evidence from California and Other States. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Schrag, Peter. 2004. Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. Rev. ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ulferts, Alisa. 2003. “Lawmakers Want Hard Road for Initiatives.” St. Petersburg Times, December 9. http://www.sptimes.com/2003/12/09/State/Lawmakers_want_hard_r.shtml (March 31, 2005).Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census. Various years. Governmental Finances. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census. 2003. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Waters, M. Dane. 2003. Initiative and Referendum Almanac. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar