Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:25:27.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Determinants of State Legislator Support for Restrictive Voter ID Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

William D. Hicks ,
Seth C. McKee  and
Daniel A. Smith
William D. Hicks
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
Seth C. McKee*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
Daniel A. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
*
Seth C. McKee, Texas Tech University, Holden Hall 16, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine state legislator behavior on restrictive voter identification (ID) bills from 2005 to 2013. Partisan polarization of state lawmakers on voter ID laws is well known, but we know very little with respect to other determinants driving this political division. A major shortcoming of extant research evaluating the passage of voter ID bills stems from using the state legislature as the unit of analysis. We depart from existing scholarship by using the state legislator as our unit of analysis, and we cover the entirety of the period when restrictive voter ID laws became a frequent agenda item in state legislatures. Beyond the obviously significant effect of party affiliation, we find a notable relationship between the racial composition of a member's district, region, and electoral competition and the likelihood that a state lawmaker supports a voter ID bill. Democratic lawmakers representing substantial black district populations are more opposed to restrictive voter ID laws, whereas Republican legislators with substantial black district populations are more supportive. We also find Southern lawmakers (particularly Democrats) are more opposed to restrictive voter ID legislation. In particular, we find black legislators in the South are the least supportive of restrictive voter ID bills, which is likely tied to the historical context associated with state laws restricting electoral participation. Finally, in those state legislatures where electoral competition is not intense, polarization over voter ID laws is less stark, which likely reflects the expectation that the reform will have little bearing on the outcome of state legislative contests.

Keywords

political partieslegislative behaviorlegislative politicslegislator preferencespublic policyvoter identification laws
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 411 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, Bailey, Delia, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2008. “The Effect of Voter Identification Laws on Turnout.” Social Science Working Paper #1267R, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26:533–72.Google Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, and Herron, Michael. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress.” American Political Science Review 104:519–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreto, Matt A., Nuno, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. 2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42:111–16.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.” American Political Science Review 85:457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentele, Keith G., and O'Brien, Erin E.. 2013. “Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies.” Perspectives on Politics 11:1088–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ari. 2015. Give Us the Ballot. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Berkman, Michael B., and Schniederman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review 94:859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggers, Daniel R., and Hanmer, Michael J.. 2013. “When Voting Gets Harder: Understanding the Adoption of Voter Identification Laws in the American States.” Presented at the 13th Annual State Politics and Policy Meeting, Iowa City, May 24–25.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14:63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Eichorst, Jason. 2013. “The Role of Party: The Legislative Consequences of Partisan Electoral Competition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38:83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Rachael V., James Greiner, D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2012. “Can Voter ID Laws Be Administered in a Race-Neutral Manner? Evidence from the City of Boston in 2008.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Linda R., and Noll, Roger G.. 1991. “How to Vote, Whether to Vote: Strategies for Voting and Abstaining on Congressional Roll Calls.” Political Behavior 13: 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Minnite, Lorraine C.. 2009. “Modeling Problems in the Voter Identification—Voter Turnout Debate.” Election Law Journal 8:85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra, and Orr, Marion. 2013. “Anxieties of an Ethnic Transition: The Election of the First Latino Mayor in Providence, Rhode Island.” Urban Affairs Review 49:3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, David. 1993. “Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates.” Biometrika 80:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronke, Paul, William D. Hicks, Seth C. McKee, Charles Stewart. III, and Dunham, James. 2015. “Voter ID Laws: A View from the Public.” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No 2015–13. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2594290 (accessed January 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Hicks, William D., McKee, Seth C., Sellers, Mitchell D., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2015. “A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 68:18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. V. III, and Bullock., Charles S. III. 2012. “Much Ado about Nothing? An Empirical Assessment of the Georgia Voter Identification Statute.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12:394–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jealous, Ben, and Haygood, Ryan P.. 2014. “The Battle to Protect the Vote: Voter Suppression Efforts in Five States and Their Effect on the 2014 Midterm Elections.” Center for American Progress, December. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/VoterSupression-report-Dec2014.pdf (accessed December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2009. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl E., Berry, William D., Carsey, Thomas M., Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Snyder, James M.. 2013. State Legislative Election Returns, 1967-2010 (ICPSR Study No. 34297). Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knafo, Saki. 2013. “Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Could Disenfranchise More than 500,000 People: Trial Expert.” Huffington Post, July 16. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/16/pennsylvania-voter-id-law_n_3605658.html (accessed December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. “The Election of African Americans and Latinos to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972-1994.” American Politics Research 25:269–86.Google Scholar
McKee, Seth C. 2015. “Politics Is Local: State Legislator Voting on Restrictive Voter Identification Legislation.” Research & Politics, July-September, 1–7.Google Scholar
Mock, Brentin. 2012. “Voter ID Plunges Forward in Pennsylvania, Mississippi and Alaska.” The Nation, December 13. http://www.thenation.com/blog/171742/voter-id-plunges-for-ward-pennsylvania-mississippi-and-alaska (accessed December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Mycoff, Jason D., Wagner, Michael W., and Wilson, David C.. 2009. “The Empirical Effects of Voter-ID Laws: Present or Absent?” PS: Political Science & Politics 42:121–26.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2014. “Voter Identification Requirements | Voter ID Laws.” http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx#Ftn%205 (accessed January 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1987. “Agendas and the Control of Political Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 81:179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, Rene, and Matsubayashi, Tetsuya. 2014. “The Politics of Race and Voter ID Laws in the States: The Return of Jim Crow?” Political Research Quarterly 67:666–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddharta, Mahanta. 2011. “South Carolina Voter ID Law: Yep, Pretty Discriminating.” Mother Jones, October 19. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/10/south-carolina-voter-id-law-yep-pretty-discriminating (accessed February 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. Jr., and Groseclose, Timothy. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44:193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vercellotti, Timothy, and Andersen, David. 2009. “Voter-Identification Requirements and the Learning Curve.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42:117–20.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 1998. “Sophisticated Voting in Supermajoritarian Settings.” Journal of Politics 60:149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Spakovsky, Hans. 2011. “Voter ID Is a Sensible Precaution.” Heritage Foundation, August 6. http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2011/08/voter-id-is-a-sensible-precaution?query=Voter+ID+is+a+Sensible+Precaution (accessed December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Wilson, David C., and Brewer, Paul R.. 2013. “The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77:962–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Hicks et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Hicks et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 137.3 KB