Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:09:12.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deliberative Democracy in Theory and Practice: Connecticut's Medicaid Managed Care Council

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Colleen M. Grogan  and
Michael K. Gusmano
Colleen M. Grogan
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Michael K. Gusmano
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite calls for greater deliberation among citizens on public policy, we have little information about how existing deliberation is structured or how well it works. We examine Connecticut's effort to put public deliberation to work in Medicaid policymaking. Findings from our participant-observation study and in-person interviews with 100 participants in this process suggest some important qualifications to literature on public deliberation. Greater inclusion of diverse social groups from the target population is important, but this should not replace the inclusion of professional advocates since the latter are often more willing than citizen representatives to challenge policy experts on technical issues. Incorporating public deliberation into the process at an early stage is ideal, but deliberation during the later stages of policymaking (including during implementation) can still produce useful results. Finally, the style and purpose of deliberation can shape the range of topics on the agenda, so it is important to understand how the structure of a deliberative forum can affect the style and purpose of deliberation.

The essence of democracy itself is now widely taken to be deliberation, as opposed to voting, interest aggregation, constitutional rights, or even self-government. (Dryzek 2000, 1).

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Summer 2005 , pp. 126 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Julia, Forest, Pierre-Gerlier, Eyles, John, Smith, Patricia, Martin, Elisabeth, and Gauvin, Francois-Pierre. 2003. “Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes.” Social Science and Medicine 57:239–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beierle, Thomas C., and Konisky, David M.. 2000. “Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19:587–602.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William. 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, Mark, and Mattson, Kevin. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation within a Representative System.” Polity 31:609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1998. “Democracy and Liberty.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. 1995. “Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance.” In Associations and Democracy, eds. Cohen, Joshua, Rogers, Joel, and Wright, Erik Olin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Donahue, John D. 1999. Hazardous Crosscurrents: Confronting Inequality in an Era of Devolution. New York: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1999. “Enabling Democratic Deliberation: How Managed Care Organizations Ought to Make Decisions about Coverage for New Technologies.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 1996. “Publicity-Stunt Participation and Sound Bite Polemics: The Health Care Debate 1993-94.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 21:3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. “Deliberation as Discussion.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 1998. “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1999. “Democratic Disagreement.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, I and II. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1996. Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2003. “The Difference States Make: Democracy, Identity, and the American City.” American Political Science Review 97:501–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holahan, John, Zuckerman, Stephen, Evans, Alison, and Rangarajan, Suresh. 1998. “Medicaid Managed Care in Thirteen States.” Health Affairs 17:43–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, Robert E., and McCue, Michael J.. 2000. Partnership Pays: Making Medicaid Managed Care Work in a Turbulent Environment. Princeton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies Inc.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Carpini, Michael Delli. 2000. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Discursive Capital. Unpublished report to the Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 1998. “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn, and Martin, John A.. 1991. “Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Design, Perspectives, and Policy Formation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10:46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Cheryl Simrell, Feltey, Kathryn M., and Susel, Bridget O'Neil. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 58:317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1999. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry. 1998. “All Men Are Liars: Is Democracy Meaningless?” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, Richard. 1996. The Devolution Revolution: An Overview. New York: Rockefeller Institute Bulletin.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “Size Doesn't Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:411–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1995. “Who Should Do What? Divided Responsibility in the Federal System.” Brookings Review 13:6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1998. “Deliberation and Ideological Domination.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ravenscroft, Neil, Curry, Nigel, and Markwell, Susan. 2002. “Outdoor Recreation and Participative Democracy in England and Wales.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45:715–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee. 1995. “Reactive Devaluation in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution.” In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1995. “The Irony of Modern Democracy and the Viability of Efforts to Reform Its Practice.” In Associations and Democracy, eds. Cohen, Joshua, Rogers, Joel, and Wright, Erik Olin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1999. “Three Limitations of Deliberative Democracy: Identity Politics, Bad Faith, and Indeterminacy.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1998. “Pathologies of Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1998. “Health-Health Trade-offs.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2000. “Deliberative Trouble? Why Some Groups Go to Extremes.” Yale Law Journal 110:71–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, John Clayton. 1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Thompson, Frank J., and Dilulio, John J.. 1998. Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Orren, Gary R.. 1985. Equality in America: The View from the Top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, Pamela. 2002. Welfare Policymaking in the States: The Devil in Devolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar