Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:20:17.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Christian Right and Public Policy: Social Movement Elites as Institutional Activists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Kenneth D. Wald  and
Jeffrey C. Corey
Kenneth D. Wald
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Jeffrey C. Corey
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When social movement activists achieve an institutional position at the policymaking table, does their political behavior moderate with the norms of that institution? We explore this question by examining the behavior and attitudes of Christian Right activists appointed to serve on the 1997-98 Florida Constitutional Revision Commission (CRC). This commission was marked by an unusually high degree of conflict between three factions—Democrats, business-oriented Republicans, and socially conservative Republicans associated with the Christian Right. We found that by maintaining an outsider, purist political style, the commissioners with Christian Right ties were ineffective, isolated, and estranged from the mainstream Republicans on the CRC. The former remained true to their outsider status, behaving more like purist social movement activists than public officials with professional orientations. While these Christian Right elites adapted outwardly to some institutional norms for strategic purposes, they did not assimilate wholly to the demands of conventional political interchange.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 99 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atwood, Thomas C. 1990. “Through a Glass Darkly.” Policy Review 5:44–53.Google Scholar
Bendyna, Mary E., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1997. “The Christian Right Old and New: A Comparison of the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition.” In Sojourners in the Wilderness: The Christian Right in Comparative Perspective, eds. Smidt, Corwin E. and Penning, James M.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bendyna, Mary E., Green, John C., Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2000. “Catholics and the Christian Right: A View From Four States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39:321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and Maio, Gerald De. 1999. “The Anti-Christian Fundamentalist Factor in Contemporary Politics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63:508–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Steven Preston. 1998. “Restoring Faith: The New Christian Right, Religious Liberty, and the Courts.” Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the New Christian Right: Conservative Protestant Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, Michael. 1989. Fall from Grace: The Failed Crusade of the Christian Right. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Deckman, Melissa M. 1999. “School Board Elections and the Christian Right: Strategies and Tactics at the Grassroots.” American Review of Politics 20:123–139.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Gordon, Milton. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, John C., and Guth, James L.. 1988. “The Christian Right in the Republican Party: The Case of Pat Robertson's Supporters.” Journal of Politics 50:150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lienesch, Michael. 1982. “Right-Wing Religion: Christian Conservatism as a Political Movement.” Political Science Quarterly 97:405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1949. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Trans. Eden and Cedar Paul. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moen, Matthew C. 1989. The Christian Right and Congress. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Moen, Matthew C. 1994. “From Revolution to Evolution: The Changing Nature of the Christian Right.” Sociology of Religion 55:345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, Matthew C. 1996. Transformation of the Christian Right. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Moen, Matthew C. 1997. “The Changing Nature of Christian Right Activism: 1970s-1990s.” In Sojourners in the Wilderness: The Christian Right in Comparative Perspective, eds. Smidt, Corwin E. and Penning, James M.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 1995. “Actor Formation, Social Coordination and Political Strategy: Some Conceptual Problems in the Study of Social Movements.” Sociology 29:667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, Duane. 1996. The Right and the Righteous: The Christian Right Confronts the Republican Party. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosin, Hanna. 2000. “A ‘Maturing’ Christian Right,” Washington Post, 7 April, 4a.Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1996a. Second Coming: The New Christian Right in Virginia Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1996b. “Second Coming: The Strategies of the New Christian Right.” Political Science Quarterly 111:271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Green, John C.. 1998. “Religious Constituencies and Support for the Christian Right in the 1990s.” Social Science Quarterly 79:815–827.Google Scholar
Santoro, Wayne A., and McGuire, Gail M.. 1997. “Social Movement Insiders: The Impact of Institutional Activists on Affirmative Action and Comparable Worth Policies.” Social Problems 44:503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, John W., and Clarke, James W.. 1970. “Amateurs and Professionals: A Study of Delegates to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.” American Political Science Review 64:888–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Denis G., Pressman, Jeffrey L., Page, Benjamin I., and Lyons, John J.. 1978. “Purists and Professionals in Party Politics.” In Political Parties, eds. Abbot, David W. and Rogowski, Edward T.. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 1995. “Florida: Running Globally and Winning Locally.” In God at the Grassroots: The Christian Right in the 1994 Elections, eds. Rozell, Mark J. and Wilcox, Clyde. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S. Jr. 1989. “Habits of the Mind? The Problem of Authority in the New Christian Right.” In Religion and Political Behavior in the United States, ed. Jelen, Ted. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Scher, Richard K.. 1997. “Losing by Winning? The Odyssey of the Religious Right in Florida.” In God at the Grassroots 1996, eds. Rozell, Mark and Wilcox, Clyde. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Tartaglione, Maureen, and Scher, Richard K.. 2000. “Answered Prayers and Mixed Blessings: The Christian Right in Florida.” In Prayers in the Precincts: The Christian Right in the 1998 Elections, ed. Green, John C., Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wallsten, Peter. 1998. “Abolish Constitutional Panel, A Member Says,” St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar