Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:10:46.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building a Better Speed Trap: Measuring Policy Adoption Speed in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Daniel J. Mallinson
Daniel J. Mallinson*
Affiliation:
Stockton University, Galloway, NJ, USA
*
Daniel J. Mallinson, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway, NJ 08205, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comparative approach to studying the spread of policy innovations has recently yielded new and interesting results, as well as theoretical advancements, for policy diffusion research. Specifically, punctuated equilibrium theory has been offered as an explanation for why some policies spread quickly, while others do so normally, and still others are adopted very slowly. Studies of adoption speed, however, currently rely on careful case selection or a dichotomous categorization of adoptions as fast or slow to test why policies diffuse at different speeds. Building on this foundational work, I propose a method for measuring adoption speed as a continuous concept, so that it can be modeled directly as an important outcome of interest to diffusion scholars. I then use the new measure to evaluate how adoption speed varies across time and policy domain. I further demonstrate the utility of the measure as a dependent variable by replicating past results, including the interactive effect of complexity and salience on adoption speed and positive effect of federal incentives, as well as finding preliminary evidence that policy clusters spread more rapidly than the average stand-alone policy.

Keywords

policy adoptiondiffusionadoption speedinnovation attributes
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Special Issue Title: Policy Diffusion , March 2016 , pp. 98 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Mahalley D., Pettus, Carrie, and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2004. “Making the National Local: Specifying the Conditions for National Government Influence on State Policymaking.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4:318–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, Frank M. 1969. “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables.” Management Science 15 (5): 215–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baybeck, Brady, Berry, William D., and Siegel, David A.. 2011. “A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion via Intergovernmental Competition.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 232–47..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Baybeck, Brady. 2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” The American Political Science Review 99 (4): 505–19..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Skinner, Paul. 2012. “State Policy Innovativeness Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (3): 303–29..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2012. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the Diffusion of Innovations.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (1): 127–46..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breunig, Christian, and Koski, Chris. 2006. “Punctuated Equillibria and Budgets in the American States.” Policy Studies Journal 34 (3): 363–79..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Jill. 1985. “Policy Diffusion and Program Scope: Research Directions.” Publius 15 (4): 61–70..Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2014. “Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (2): 399–408..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Charles D., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2015. “Uncovering Patterns among Latent Variables: Human Rights and De Facto Judicial Independence.” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2607543 (accessed May 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1990. American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew. 2006. “The Conditioning Effects of Policy Salience and Complexity on American Political Institutions.” The Policy Studies Journal 34 (2): 223–43..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J., and Schnakenberg, Keith E.. 2014. “Measuring Mutual Dependence between State Repressive Actions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (6): 1003–32..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Brian, and Teske, Paul. 2000. “Regulatory Policymaking in the American States: A Review of Theories and Evidence.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (4): 849–86..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Hays, Scott P.. 1991. “Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws.” The Journal of Politics 53 (3): 835–50..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gormley, William T. Jr. 1986. “Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System.” Polity 18 (4): 595–620..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Erin R., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2013. “The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 1–29..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” The American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1174–85..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1993. “Stability and Change in State Interest Group Systems, 1975-1990.” State and Local Government Review 25 (2): 87–96..Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A. M.. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Scott P. 1996. “Influences on Reinvention during the Diffusion of Innovations.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (3): 631–50..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2014. “Who Passes Business's ‘Model Bills?‘ Policy Capacity and Corporation Influence in U.S. State Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 582–602..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2006. “National Intervention and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 34:403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2012. “Vertical Diffusion and the Policy-Making Process: The Politics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 48–61..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Hannah K., Ducharme, Lori J., and Roman, Paul M.. 2007. “The Adoption of Medications in Substance Abuse Treatment: Associations with Organizational Characteristics and Technology Clusters.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 87 (2–3): 164–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13 (4): 345–64..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbloom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.‘” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business and Public Policy: Case Studies and Political Theory.” World Politics 16 (4): 677–715..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1998. “New Dimensions in Policy and Politics.” In Moral Controversies in American Politics, eds. Tatalovich, Raymond and Daynes, Bryan. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 108–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Joseph P., Wolfgang, Paul, Leckrone, J. Wesley, Gollob, Justin, Bossie, Jason, Jennings, Jay, and Atherton, Michelle J.. 2010. “The Pennsylvania Policy Database Project: A Model for Comparative Analysis.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (3): 320–36..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1999. “The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy: The Case of Death Penalty Legislation in the American States.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 766–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Schuldt, Richard G.. 2008. “Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.” The Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199–218..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael, and Mason, John Lyman. 2007. How the South Joined the Gambling Nation: The Politics of State Policy Innovation. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. “The Politics of Diffusion: Public Policy in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 192–205..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2012. “The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation across the American States.” The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 187–202..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J., Worsham, Jeff, and Eisner, Marc Allen. 2003. “Salience, Complexity, and the Legislative Direction of Regulatory Bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2): 141–64..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. “Comment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (398): 543–46..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, Robert L. 1978. “Policy Innovativeness as a Trait of American States.” The Journal of Politics 40 (1): 212–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, Robert L. 1985. “When a Policy's Time Has Come: Cases of Rapid Policy Diffusion, 1983-1984.” Publius 15 (3): 111–25..Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50:825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Lowery, David, and Smith, Roland. 1983. “The Tax Revolt: A Comparative State Analysis.” The Western Political Quarterly 36 (1): 30–51..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishwanath, Arun, and Chen, Hao. 2006. “Technology Clusters: Using Multidimensional Scaling to Evaluate and Structure Technology Clusters.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (11): 1451–60..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” The American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880–99..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1971. “Innovation in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Jacob, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth N.. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 354–87.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Thompson, Kay. 1980. “The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 715–29..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Christopher J. W. 2000. “Modeling Duration Dependence.” Political Analysis 8 (3): 367–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar