Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:24:18.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for “Racism”: Responses to Political Predicaments in Two States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Byron D'Andra Orey ,
L. Marvin Overby ,
Barbara J. Walkosz  and
Kimberly R. Walker
Byron D'Andra Orey
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
L. Marvin Overby
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Barbara J. Walkosz
Affiliation:
University of Colorado-Denver
Kimberly R. Walker
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi and Alcorn State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do people explain their behavior in socially unacceptable political situations? Exploring this question will give us insight into how the public responds to and frames collective decisions regarding controversial topics. We analyze accounts of the outcomes of racially sensitive statewide referenda in two states to understand the public responses to such political predicaments. Distinguishing four broad categories of these accounts—denials, justifications, excuses, and confessions—we find some clear-cut differences in their use between proponents and opponents of the ballot measures. These results have implications for political thought and dialogue regarding politically-sensitive issues and other heated policy issues. We also discuss how the different account dynamics in these two cases presaged subsequent political developments in these states, which might provide insights into why some such cases continue to be fiercely contested while others fade from public debate.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Fall 2007 , pp. 235 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, W. Lance. 1980. “The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts.” Journal of Politics 42:792–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, David S. 1990. “Arizona Soap Opera,” in The Washington Post, 5 May.Google Scholar
Cash, W.J. 1941. The Mind of the South. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Chanley, Virginia, Sullivan, John L., Gonzales, Marti Hope, and Kovera, Margaret Bull. 1994. “Lust and Avarice in Politics: Damage Control by Four Politicians Accused of Wrongdoing (or, Politics as Usual).” American Politics Quarterly 22:297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John A. 1997. “Explaining Elite Attitudes on the Georgia Flag.” American Politics Quarterly 25:482–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Bob, and Burgess, Mike. 1990. “Looks Like Tempe to Keep Fiesta Bowl, in Arizona Republic, 12 November.Google Scholar
Covington, John. “Get Over Losing Vote for New Flag.” Clarion Ledger, 2 May, 10A.Google Scholar
Creno, Glen. 1990. “Poll Respondents Say King Day Flap Will Harm Arizona,” Phoenix Gazette, 6 December.Google Scholar
Crutcher, Pepper. 2001. “Flag Alternative too ‘Generic’ for State. Clarion Ledger, 9 May, 12A.Google Scholar
Felson, Richard B., and Ribner, Stephen A.. 1981. “An Attributional Approach to Accounts and Sanctions for Criminal Violence.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44:137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Homestyle. Boston, MA: Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Flannery, Pat. 1990a. “King Day Defeat May Spark compromise,” Phoenix Gazette, 7 November.Google Scholar
Flannery, Pat. 1990b. “Older, Rural Voters Beat King Day,” Phoenix Gazette, 14 November.Google Scholar
Gater, Harold. 2001. “Survey Results,” Clarion Ledger, 5 February: 7A.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Marti Hope, Kovera, Margaret Bull, Sullivan, John L., and Chanley, Virginia. 1995. “Private Reactions to Public Transgressions: Predictors of Evaluative Responses to Allegations of Political Misconduct.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21:136–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, C. Donald. 1990. “King Holiday: The Entire State Will Pay,” Tucson Citizen, 9 November.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1992. “The Constructed Explanation: Interpreting Election Results in the 1984 Presidential Race.” Journal of Politics 54:943–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, Miles. 1990. “The Ultimate Attribution Error: A Review of the Literature on Intergroup Causal Attribution.” European Journal of Social Psychology 20:311–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mike. 2001. “Mississippi Not Racist for Keeping Flag.” Clarion Ledger, 1 May 6A.Google Scholar
Kanengiser, Andy. 2001. “MEC Supports Vote for New Flag,” Clarion Ledger, 6 January, 1A.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1966. Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Klinkner, Philip A. 2001. “Waving the ‘White Flag’: Racial Voting Patterns in the 2001 Mississippi Flag Referendum.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34:647.Google Scholar
Litton, Ian, and Potter, Jonathan. 1985. “Social Representations in the Ordinary Explanation of a Riot.” European Journal of Social Psychology 15:371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, Stanford M. and Scott, Marvin B.. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33:46–62.Google Scholar
McClain, Paula D. 1988. “Arizona ‘High Noon’: The Recall and Impeachment of Evan Mecham.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21:628–38.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1990. “Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications.” British Journal of Political Science 20:119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991. “Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts.” American Political Science Review 85:1133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Jerry. 2001. “Flag Campaigns Low Key,” Clarion Ledger, 8 April, 1A.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jerry, and Sawyer, Patricia. 2001. “Did Black Residents Vote to Keep Flag?” Clarion Ledger, 29 April, 1B and 5B.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michael. 1990. “Arizona Image Takes Pounding Over King Day,” Phoenix Gazette, 8 November.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Michael J. 1991. “King Day Deserves a Better Airing,” Arizona Republic, 17 March.Google Scholar
Orey, Byron D'Andra. 2004. “A Research Note on White Racial Attitudes and Support for the Mississippi State Flag.” American Politics Research 32:102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1979. “The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5:461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raspberry, William. 2001. “Two Cases of Denial,” Washington Post, 23 April, A15.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Wike, Richard S.. 1998. “Confederate Symbols, Southern Identity, and Racial Attitudes: The Case of the Georgia State Flag.” Social Science Quarterly 79:568–80.Google Scholar
Riordan, Catherine A., Marlin, Nancy A., and Kellogg, Ronald T.. 1983. “The Effectiveness of Accounts Following Transgression.” Social Psychology Quarterly 46:213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenquist, Carl M. 1932. “Differential Responses of Texas Convicts.” American Journal of Sociology 38:10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Patrick. 2001. “Opposing Sides Hope Voter Turnout Strong,” Clarion Ledger, 17 April, 1A.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Barry R. 1980. Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Schönbach, Peter. 1990. Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semin, Gun, and Manstead, Anthony S. R.. 1983. The Accountability of Conduct. London, UK: Academic.Google Scholar
Shields, Thomas J. 2003. “The ‘Tip of the Iceberg’ in a Southern Suburban County: The Fight for a Martin Luther King, Jr., Holiday.” Journal of Black Studies 33:499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Walkosz, Barbara J.. 1992. “Letters to the Editor as a Public Opinion Thermometer: The Martin Luther King Holiday Vote in Arizona” Social Science Quarterly 7:938–46.Google Scholar
Snyder, C.R. 1985. “The Excuse: An Amazing Grace?” In The Self and Social Life, ed. Schlenker, Barry R.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Snyder, C.R., and Higgins, Raymond L.. 1988. “Excuses: Their Effective Role in the Negotiation of Reality.” Psychological Bulletin 104:23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spratt, Tom. 1990. “Arizona Reputation Takes Unfair Drubbing on MLK Vote,” Phoenix Gazette, 13 November.Google Scholar
Stanton, Sam. 1990. “America Again Looks at Arizona,” Arizona Republic, 9 November.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, James T., and Norman, Nancy. 1985. “Social Power, Self-Presentation, and the Self.” In The Self and Social Life, ed. Schlenker, Barry R.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomas, Dan B., and Baas, Larry R.. 1996. “The Postelection Campaign: Competing Constructions of the Clinton Victory in 1992.” Journal of Politics 58:309–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Harvey. 2001. “History of 1894 Flag Symbolizes Mockery, Irony of Racism.” Clarion Ledger, 27 April, 10A.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6:371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Bernard, Figueroa, Alice, and Kakihara, Craig. 1991. “The Goals of Excuses and Communication Strategies Related to Causal Perceptions.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar