Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:51:26.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lobbying Across Venues: An Issue-Tracing Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Charlotte Jourdain ,
Simon Hug  and
Frédéric Varone
Charlotte Jourdain*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Simon Hug
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Frédéric Varone
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
*
Charlotte Jourdain, Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Geneva, Unimail – 40 Bvd. du Pont d'Arve, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines lobbying activity during four California policymaking processes and through the four institutional venues available in that state: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, and the ballot initiative. It shows that past advocacy activity explains future mobilization on the same policy issue. Groups that fail to reach their policy goals will be more likely to mobilize later if the policy process changes venue, compared with those that have achieved their policy preference. Thus, the availability of multiple venues provides a counterweight to the possible advantages received by certain group types in each venue. Furthermore, public interest groups are more likely to mobilize across venues and repeatedly within a venue, while business groups are less likely to do so.

Keywords

interest groupslobbyingpolicy processdirect democracypooled time series
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 127 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, Takeshi. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. 2007. “EU Lobbying: A View from the US.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3): 482–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Leech, Beth L., Kimball, David C.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses and Why. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Groups Involvement in National Politics.” The Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1191–213..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Epstein, David, Jackman, Simon, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2001. “Alternative Models of Dynamics in Binary Time-Series–Cross-Section Models: The Example of State Failure.” Paper Prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Emory University, July, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1260–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhagen, Patrick, Duer, Andreas, and Marshall, David. 2014. “Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3:202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, Jan. 2008. “Policy Issues, Organisational Format and the Political Strategies of Interest Organisations.” West European Politics 31 (6): 1188–211..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, Anne S. 2005. “Interest Groups Strategies: Navigating between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure.” Political Studies 53:694–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, Anne S., Christiansen, Peter, and Pedersen, Helene. 2015. “Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy, Parliament, and the Media.” Governance 28:95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, Anne S., and Kroyer, Simon. 2012. “Customizing Strategy: Policy Goals and Interest Group Strategies.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 1 (1): 115–38..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John Wiggs. 2013. “Business as Usual: Interest Groups Access and Representation across Policy-Making Venues.” Journal of Public Policy 33 (1): 3–33..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffardi, Anne L., Pekkanen, Robert J., and Smith, Steven Rathgeb. 2014. “Shopping or Specialization? Venue Targeting among Nonprofits Engaged in Advocacy.” Policy Studies Journal 43:188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David L., Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 551–69..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, Scott R., and Kerwin, Cornelius M.. 2005. “Interest Group Participation in Rule-Making: A Decade of Change.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 353–70..Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Groups Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2012. The Not-so-Special Interests: Interest Groups, Public Representation, and American Governance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Ozan Kalkan, K.. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–77..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G. 2004. “Lobbying Strategies, Venue Selection, and Organized Interest Involvement at the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 32 (2): 170–97..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1981. “The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-Discrete Data Stochastic Process.” In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data and Econometric Applications, eds. Manski, Charles F. and McFadden, Daniel L.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 114–78.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L. and Salisbury, Robert H.. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, Marchetti, Kathleen M., Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2015. “Assessing Business Advantage in Washington Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 4:205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2003. “Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Groups Lobbying across Multiple Venues.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (3): 325–36..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T., Brown, Heath, and Henig, Jeffrey R.. 2012. “Shopping in the Political Arena: Strategic State and Local Venue Selection by Advocates.” State and Local Government Review 44 (1): 9–20..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon, and Wegmann, Simone. 2016. “Complying with Human Rights.” International Interactions 42 (4): 590–615..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan, and Baumgartner, Frank. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Tresch, Anke and Jochum, Margit. 2007. “Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Western European Collective Political Actors.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 48–73..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, Aaron J., and Weber, Edward P.. 2015. “The Adaptive Venue Shopping Framework: How Emergent Groups Choose Environmental Policymaking Venues.” Environmental Politics 24 (5): 703–22..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David. 2007. “Why Do Organized Interests Lobby? A Multi-Goal, Multi-Context Theory of Lobbying.” Polity 39 (1): 29–54..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 2004. “A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 57:164–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubell, Mark. 2013. “Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41:537–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1979. Analyzing Panel Data. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Amy M. 2011. “The Decision to Lobby Bureaucrats.” Public Choice 147:123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Amy M. 2012. “Buying Policy? The Effects of Lobbyists' Resources on Their Policy Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (4): 908–23..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Kenneth. 2009. Direct Democracy and the Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Powell, Emilia Justyna. 2011. Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J., and Freeman, Patricia. 1998. “Interest Group Activity in the States.” Journal of Politics 60 (1): 86–112..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polletta, F., and Jasper, J. M.. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2007. “The International Court of Justice and the World's Three Legal Systems.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 397–415..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pralle, Sarah B. 2003. “Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23:233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pralle, Sarah B. 2006. Branching Out, Digging in: Environmental Advocacy and Agenda Setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Pralle, Sarah B. 2010. “Shopping around: Environmental Organizations and the Search for Policy Venues.” In Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, eds. Prakash, A. and Kay Gugerty, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Vreeland, James R.. 2000. “The Effect of IMF Programs on Economic Growth.” Journal of Development Economics 62 (2): 385–421..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2006. “Why Do Interest Groups Engage the Judiciary? Policy Wishes and Structural Needs.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (3): 558–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2009. “Anti-Discrimination Policy Actors and Their Use of Litigation Strategies: The Influence of Identity Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (5): 738–754..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varone, Frédéric, Ingold, Karin and Jourdain, Charlotte. 2017. “Defending the status quo across venues and coalitions: Evidence from California interest groups.” Journal of Public Policy 37 (1): 1–26..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegmann, Simone. 2012. Regional Human Rights Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Geneva: Geneva Laboratory of Political Science.Google Scholar