Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:30:53.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Courts Structure State-Level Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jonathan P. Kastellec
Jonathan P. Kastellec*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
*
Jonathan P. Kastellec, Princeton University, 028 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine how courts condition the relationship between state-level public opinion and policy. The system of federalism in the United States allows federal and state courts to establish the types of policies that states are constitutionally allowed to implement. In particular, federal courts can set “federal floors” for policy, below which no states can go. State courts, in turn, can raise the level of this floor. Thus, both federal and state courts shape whether state policy can match the preferences of the median voter in a given state. Analyzing data on public opinion, judicial decisions, and state-level policy on the issue of abortion, from 1973 to 2012, I show that changes in the set of allowable abortion restrictions, according to the combined decisions of state and federal courts, significantly affect whether states implement majority-preferred policies. I also show that ignoring the influence of courts on the policymaking environment significantly affects the estimated level of policy congruence and thus conclusions about the scope of representation. These results demonstrate the importance of placing courts in the larger study of state-level representation.

Keywords

courtsfederal/statefederalismjudicial politicsrepresentationpublic opinionabortion policypublic policy
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 27 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 372–87..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas. 2005. “Fitting Linear Models in R Using the lme4 Package.” R News 5 (1): 27–30..Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2007. “Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series–Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments.” Political Analysis 15 (2): 182–95..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher. 2007. “The Impact of School Finance Judgments on State Fiscal Policy.” In The School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy, eds. West, Martin and Peterson, Paul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 213–42.Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W., and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2004. “Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (3): 345–63..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 360–72..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Sims-Butler, Kellie, Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science 46:173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, William J. 1977. “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights.” Harvard Law Review 90:489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 29–40..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldarone, Richard P., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” The Journal of Politics 71 (2): 560–73..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camobreco, John F., and Barnello, Michelle A.. 2008. “Democratic Responsiveness and Policy Shock: The Case of State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8 (1): 48–65..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2015. “From Mass Preferences to Policy.” Annual Review of Political Science 18:147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2015. “Dynamic Estimation of Latent Opinion Using a Hierarchical Group-Level IRT Model.” Political Analysis 23 (2): 197–211..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2015. “Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (2): 399–408..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1993. “State Political Cultures and Public Opinion about Abortion.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (4): 771–81..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devins, Neal. 2016. “Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government.” Vanderbilt Law Review 69:935–90.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Koch, Julianna. 2013. “Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13 (3): 349–72..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (But We're Not Sure Why).” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13:263–81.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2000. “The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Three: The Lesson of Lochner.” New York University Law Review 76:1383–455.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gabry, Jonah. 2016. “Bayesian Applied Regression Modeling via Stan: An R Package.” Version 2.9.0-3. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstanarm/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine 27 (15): 2865–73..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John B., Stern, Hal S., Dunson, David B., Vehtari, Aki, and Rubin, Donald B.. 2014. Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multi-level/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Rubin, Donald B.. 1992. “Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences.” Statistical Science 7:457–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Su, Yu-Sung, Yajima, Masanao, Hill, Jennifer, Grazia Pittau, M., Kerman, Jouni, Zheng, Tian, and Dorie, Vincent. 2015. “Arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models: R Package.” Version 1.8-6. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arm/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40:99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R. 1994. “The Impact of Permissive Judicial Policies: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Right to Die.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (1): 207–22..Google Scholar
Goggin, Malcolm L., and Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “Abortion and Opinion and Policy in the American States.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 190–202.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2:107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2011. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Rachael K. 2015. “Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1002–21..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2016. “Empirically Evaluating the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty: Public Opinion, State Policy, and Judicial Decisions before Roe v. Wade.” Journal of Law & Courts 4 (1): 1–42..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. Forthcoming. “Judicial Federalism and Representation.” Journal of Law & Courts.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 43 (1): 151–86..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1997. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85:491–554.Google Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J. 2015. “Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (1): 41–66..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J., and Boehmke, Frederick J.. 2016. “Modeling Heterogeneity in Pooled Event History Analysis.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 121–41..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura, and Brace, Paul. 2005. “The Preemptive Power of State Supreme Courts: Adoption of Abortion and Death Penalty Legislation.” Policy Studies Journal 33 (3): 317–40..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 107–21..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 148–66..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardt, David. 2013. “In Public Opinion on Abortion, Few Absolutes.” Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/in-public-opinion-on-abortion-few-absolutes/ (accessed June 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Luks, Samantha, and Salamone, Michael. 2008. “Abortion.” In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, eds. Persily, Nathaniel, Citrin, Jack, and Egan, Patrick J.. New York: Oxford University Press, 80–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1 (1): 111–25..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 707–22..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, Julianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 415–39..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2014. “Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues.” American Politics Research 42 (6): 986–1009..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–90..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Dana. 2007. “The Supreme Court and Morality Policy Adoption in the American States the Impact of Constitutional Context.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 468–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Douglas S. 2003. On Equal Terms: The Constitutional Politics of Educational Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Westerland, Chad, and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 89–104..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 825–43..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, Kenneth E., and Gelman, Andrew. 2015. “Hierarchical Models for Estimating State and Demographic Trends in U.S. Death Penalty Public Opinion.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 178 (1): 1–28..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, Keele, Luke, and Park, David. 2007. “A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” Political Analysis 15 (2): 165–81..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 2007. Girls on the Stand: How Courts Fail Pregnant Minors. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stan Development Team. 2016a. “RStan: The R interface to Stan.” Version 2.9.0. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/vignettes/rstan.htmlGoogle Scholar
Stan Development Team. 2016b. “The Stan Math Library.” Version 2.9.0.Available at: http://mc-stan.org/users/interfaces/mathGoogle Scholar
Treier, Shawn, and Jackman, Simon. 2008. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 201–17..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, Christopher, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?” The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 203–19..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 583–96..CrossRefGoogle Scholar