Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:05:13.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Familiar Choices: Reconsidering the Institutional Effects of the Direct Initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Craig M. Burnett  and
Vladimir Kogan
Craig M. Burnett*
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
Vladimir Kogan
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
*
Craig M. Burnett, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32107, Boone, NC 28608, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that voters in states with direct democracy feel better prepared to cast competent votes and that they do so at a greater rate than voters elsewhere. What causal mechanism explains why the presence of direct democracy leads to better civic citizenship and differences in political behavior? We use a survey experiment in which we randomly vary the text used to describe the policy proposals to consider one possible pathway that explains higher levels of political competence among voters in initiative states. In contrast to the focus on campaign mobilization in the existing literature, we rely on insights from consumer decision theory to derive testable hypotheses about voter behavior. We find evidence that voters in initiative states approach political campaigns in a fundamentally different way than voters in noninitiative states. In particular, we show that individuals in initiative states are less susceptible to framing effects—in our experiment, strategic efforts to craft a ballot measure's title and summary.

Keywords

campaignsdirect democracyelectionssurvey experimentvoting behavior
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 204 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba, Joseph W., and Wesley Hutchinson, J.. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 13:411–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D., and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason, Barrilleaux, Charles, and Scheller, Daniel. 2010. Ballot Initiative Knowledge and Voter Turnout: Evidence From Field Experiments and National Surveys. Unpublished manuscript. Tallahassee: Florida State University.Google Scholar
Bettman, James R., Eric, , Johnson, J., and Payne, John W.. 1991. “Consumer Decision Making.” In Handbook of Consumer Behavior, eds. Robertson, Thomas S. and Kassarjian, Harold H.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bettman, James R., and Sujan, Mita. 1987. “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Research 14:141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggers, Daniel R. 2011. “When Ballot Issues Matter: Social Issue Ballot Measures and Their Impact on Turnout.” Political Behavior 33:3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes About Citizen Influence on Government.” British Journal of Political Science 32:371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74:78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, William G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1973. “Perception in Chess.” Cognitive Psychology 4:55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childers, Matthew A., and Binder, Mike. n.d. “Engaged by the Initiative? How the Use of Citizen Initiatives Increases Voter Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
de Groot, Adriaan D. 1965. Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J., and Seabrook, Nicholas R.. 2010. “Mobilized by Direct Democracy: Short-Term Versus Long-Term Effects and the Geography of Turnout in Ballot Measure Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 91:188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, Michelle P. 1988. “Confusion an Issue Over Abortion Vote,” Denver PostGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. 2001. “Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education.” Annual Review of Political Science 4:217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. “How Large and Long-Lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results From a Randomized Experiment.” American Political Science Review 105:1, 135–50.Google Scholar
Harmon, Steven. 2010. “Key Ruling Throws Out Claim That Prop. 25 Would Protect Two-Thirds Vote on Taxes,” Contra Costa Times, http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_15687454Google Scholar
Hawkins, Scott A., and Hoch, Stephen J.. 1992. “Low-Involvement Learning: Memory Without Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 19:212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. “Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes About Government Responsiveness in the American States: Do Social and Institutional Contexts Matter?” British Journal of Political Science 34:109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyer, Wayne D. 1984. “An Examination of Consumer Decision Marking for a Common Repeat Purchase Product.” Journal of Consumer Research 11:822–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Daniel, H. Lowenstein, and Masket, Seth. 2001. “The Stealth Campaign: Experimental Studies of Slate Mail in California.” Journal of Law & Politics 17:295–332.Google Scholar
Johnson, Eric J., and Edward Russo, J.. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 11:543–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47:263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values and Frames.” American Psychologist 39:341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, Vladimir. 2010. “The Irony of Comprehensive State Constitutional Reform.” Rutgers Law Journal 41(4): 881–905.Google Scholar
Lacey, Robert J. 2005. “The Electoral Allure of Direct Democracy: The Effect of Initiative Salience on Voting, 1990–1996.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.” Critical Review 18:217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2005. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2009. “Direct Democracy and Public Employees.” American Economics Review 99:2227–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Analysis.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5:133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Robert J. 1981. “A Model of Multiattribute Judgments Under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint.” Journal of Marketing Research 18:428–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 301–15..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee, , Clawson, A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–83..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2003. “The Political Environment and Ballot Proposition Awareness.” American Journal of Political Science 47:403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roh, Jongho, and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2003. “All Politics Is Not Local: National Forces in State Abortion Initiatives.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (1): 15–31..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel, and Yohai, Ian. 2008. “How Initiatives Don't Always Make Citizens: Ballot Initiatives in the American States, 1978–2004.” Political Behavior 30:469–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slothuus, R. 2005. “More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual Process Model of Issue Framing Effects.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., DeSantis, Mathew, and Kassel, Jason. 2006. “Same-Sex Marriage Ballot Measures and the 2004 Presidential Election.” State and Local Government Review 38 (2): 78–91..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2001. “The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science. 45:700–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” Journal of Politics 64:892–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. “The Effectiveness of Money in Ballot Measure Campaigns.” Southern California Law Review. 78:1041–64.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2006. “Is Spending More Potent for or Against a Proposition? Evidence From Ballot Measures.” American Journal of Political Science. 50:788–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Ya-Chung. 2010. The Moderating Effect of Product Familiarity on Consumer Evaluation of Price Discount Framing. Unpublished manuscript. Taiwan: Vanung University.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2005. “The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout.” American Politics Research. 33:283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Daniel, , Bowen, C., and Donovan, Todd. 2009. “Initiative Campaigns: Direct Democracy and Voter Mobilization.” American Politics Research 37:155–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Ramona McNeal, S., and Smith, Daniel, A.. 2003. “Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3:23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, M. Dane. 2003. Initiative and Referendum Almanac. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1991. “Information, Values, and Opinion.” American Political Science Review 85:1215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar