Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:16:39.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zung Scale Factor Invariance in Male Coronary Patients and Healthy People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

Antonio del Pino Pérez ,
Ignacio Ibáñez Fernández ,
Francisco Bosa Ojeda ,
Ruth Dorta González  and
María Teresa Gaos Meizoso
Antonio del Pino Pérez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
Ignacio Ibáñez Fernández
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
Francisco Bosa Ojeda
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario de Canarias (Spain)
Ruth Dorta González
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
María Teresa Gaos Meizoso
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Antonio del Pino Pérez. Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de La Laguna. (Spain). La Laguna. 38071. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Phone:+34-922317479. Fax: +34-922317474. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was, firstly, to determine the factor structure and factor invariance of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) and, secondly, to justify its use in coronary patients (CPs) and healthy people (HP). Two comparable samples of males were studied: 217 CPs and 191 HP. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) for ordinal data were carried out with Mplus. Two models obtained from all participants in this study and another two, the model of Shafer (2006) from a meta-analysis and that of Barefoot et al. (2000) with CPs, were analyzed in CFA. A two-factor structure was supported by EFA in both samples, but none of the models showed adequate goodness-of-fit for the CPs and the HP in CFA. Only the two and three-factor models obtained from the combined sample of CPs and HP showed adequate goodness-of-fit for HP. The ZSDS showed good reliability, replicated the prevalence of depressive symptoms found in other studies and was able to distinguish between CPs and HP. We conclude that the best fit is obtained from the two-factor solution in HP, that the factor structure of the ZSDS is not invariant and is linked to positively and negatively worded items.

Keywords

Zung scalecoronary patientsdepressionfactor invariance
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E72
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahto, M., Raimo, I., Puolijokis, H., Vahlberg, T., & Kivela, S. L. (2007). Stronger symptoms of depression predict high coronary heart disease mortality in older men and women. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 757–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.1735 Google Scholar
Aragonés, E., Masdéu, R., Cando, G., & Coll, G. (2001). Validez diagnóstica de la Self-Rating Depression Scale de Zung en pacientes de atención primaria [Diagnostic validity of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in primary care patients]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 29, 310–316.Google Scholar
Barefoot, J., Brummett, B., Helms, M., Mark, D., Siegler, I., & Williams, R. (2000). Depressive symptoms and survival of patients with coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 790–795.Google Scholar
Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289455 Google Scholar
Conde, V., & Esteban, T. (1974). Contribución al estudio de la S.D.S. (Self-Rating Depression Scale) de Zung, en una muestra estratificada de población normal [Contribution to the study of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in a stratified sample of normal population]. Revista de Psicología General Aplicada, 29, 515–553.Google Scholar
Conde, V., & Esteban, T. (1975). Fiabilidad de la SDS (Self-Rating Depresión Scale) de Zung [Reliability of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale]. Revista de Psicología General Aplicada, 30, 903–913.Google Scholar
Costello, C. G. (1992). Research on symptoms versus research on syndromes: Arguments in favor of allocating more research time to the study of symptoms. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 304–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.160.3.304 Google Scholar
Davidson, K. W., Kupfer, D. J., Bigger, J. T., Califf, R. M., Carney, R. M., Coyne, J. C.,... Suls, J. M. (2006). Assessment and treatment of depression in patients with cardiovascular disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group report. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 121–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3202_9 Google Scholar
Frasure-Smith, N., & Lespérance, F. (2005). Reflections on depression as a cardiac risk factor. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, S19–S25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000162253.07959.db Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Kamphuis, M., Geerlings, M., Giampaoli, S., Nissinen, A., Grobbee, A. D., & Kromhout, D. (2009). The association of depression with cardiovascular mortality is partly explained by health status. The FINE Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 114, 184–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.005 Google Scholar
Kitamura, T., Hirano, H., Chen, Z., & Hirata, M. (2004). Factor structure of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale in first-year university students in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 128, 281–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.06.003 Google Scholar
Koivula, M., Halme, N., & Astedt-Kurki, P. (2010). Predictors of depressive symptoms among coronary heart disease patients: A cross-sectional study nine years after coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart & Lung, 39, 421–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.011 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCallum, R., Widaman, K., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84 Google Scholar
Melle, J. P., de Jonge, P., Spijkerman, T. A., Tijssen, J. G. P., Ormel, J., Veldhuisen, van,... Berg, M. P. (2004). Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 814–822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000146294.82810.9c CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, A., Kuper, H., & Hemingway, H. (2006). Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease. European Heart Journal, 27, 2763–2774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl338 Google Scholar
Parissis, J., Nikolaou, M., Farmakis, D., Bistola, V., Paraskevaidis, I., Adamopoulos, S.,... Kremastinos, D. (2008). Clinical and prognostic implications of self-rating depression scales and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure. Heart, 94, 585–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.117390 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052 Google Scholar
Romera, I., Delgado-Cohen, H., Pérez, T., Caballero, L., & Gilaberte, I. (2008). Factor analysis of the Zung self-rating depression scale in a large sample of patients with major depressive disorder in primary care. Biomedicalcentral Psychiatry, 8, 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-4 Google Scholar
Rutledge, Th., Reis, V., Linke, S., Greenberg, B., & Mills, P. (2006). Depression in heart failure. A meta-analytic review of prevalence, intervention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 48, 1527–1537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.055 Google Scholar
Shafer, A. (2006). Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and Zung. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 123–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20213 Google Scholar
Shumway, M., Sentell, T., Unick, G., & Bamberg, W. (2004). Cognitive complexity of self-administered depression measures. Journal of Affective Disorders, 83, 191–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2004.08.007 Google Scholar
Steer, R. A., Beck, A. T., & Brown, G. (1989). Sex differences on the revised beck depression inventory for outpatients with affective disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 693–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_6 Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied Psychometrics. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Google Scholar
Welin, C., Lappas, G., & Wilhelmsen, L. (2000). Independent importance of psychosocial factors for prognosis after myocardial infarction. Journal of Internal Medicine, 247, 629–639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00694.x Google Scholar
Yu, C. Y., & Muthén, B. (2001). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. (Unpublished technical report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California,Google Scholar
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). A Self-Rating Depression Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 Google Scholar
Zung, W. W. K. (1973). From art to science: The diagnosis and treatment of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 328–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030026004 Google Scholar
Zung, W. W. K., Richards, C. B., & Short, M. J. (1965). Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic. Further validation of the SDS. Archives of General Psychiatry, 13, 508–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01730060026004 Google Scholar