Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:54:20.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Youths in Residential Care Perceptions about their Group: Psychometric Properties of a Measurement Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2015

Eunice Magalhães*
Affiliation:
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) (Portugal)
Maria Manuela Calheiros
Affiliation:
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) (Portugal)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eunice Magalhães. Av. das Forças Armadas. 1649–026. Lisboa (Portugal). Phone: +351–210934 640. Fax: +351–210464017. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This study aims to present the development of a scale focused on youth’s perceptions about their group in residential care and to offer evidences of validity and reliability. This work is part of a national study involving 59 institutions and 360 adolescents (55% males) from 11 to 18 years old (M = 14.72; SD = 1.81). Evidences of validity were tested, as well as the reliability data and the relationship between group perceptions, individual characteristics and placement length. A structure with three components was found explaining 62% of variance: Deviant behavior, Positive Attributes and Oppositional Behavior. The CFA revealed good values of fit: CFI = .95, GFI = .90 and RMSEA = .050. Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation was found between positive attributes and life satisfaction (p < .001), and negative ones with deviant behavior (p < .01) and oppositional behavior (p < .01). Finally, a positive and significant correlation was found between Deviant behavior and youth’s age (p < .05), and significant gender differences were found in this dimension (i.e., p < .001; d = .38, 95% CI [–9.97, 2.94]; males reported higher scores than females). No significant correlations were found regarding the length of placement. These results suggest that this tool reveals satisfactory psychometric properties to be used in further studies with youth in residential care.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbuckle, J. (2011). Amos 20 user's guide. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Bartusch, D. J., & Matsueda, R. L. (1996). Gender, reflected appraisals, and labeling: A cross-group test of an interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75, 145177. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2580760 Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2000). Group processes (2 nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Bukowski, W., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2009). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 217231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Casas, F., Cornejo, J., Colton, M., & Scholte, E., (2000). Perceptions of stigmatization and satisfaction with services received, among users of Social Welfare Services for the child and the family in 3 European Regions. Social Indicators Research, 51, 287308.Google Scholar
Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 19.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 7175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.653 Google Scholar
Erwin, P. (1998). Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge Google Scholar
Fernández-Molina, M., Del Valle, J. F., Fuentes, M. J., Bernedo, M., & Bravo, A. (2011). Problemas de conducta de los adolescentes en acogimiento pre adoptivo, residencial y con familia extensa [Behavioral problems in adolescents who are in adoption, residential care, and grandparent fostering]. Psicothema, 23, 16.Google Scholar
Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 192205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x Google Scholar
Harter, S., Bresnick, S., Bouchey, H., & Whitesell, N. (1997). The development of multiple role-related selves during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 835853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Social identity and social comparison. In Suls, J. & Wheeler, L. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 401421). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Holahan, C. K., Holahan, C. J., & Wonacott, N. L. (1999). Self-appraisal, life satisfaction, and retrospective life voices across one and three decades. Psychology and Aging, 14, 238244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.14.2.238 Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
IBM Corp. Released (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Isabella, R. A., & Diener, M. L. (2010). Self-representations of social and academic competence: Contextual correlates in middle childhood. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24, 315331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2010.510082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killen, M., Rutland, A., & Jampol, N. (2009). Social exclusion in childhood and adolescence. In Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 249266). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. A. (1993). From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 2140. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equations modeling (2 nd Ed.). London, UK: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content analysis. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563575.Google Scholar
Magalhães, E., & Calheiros, M. M. (2014). A grounded model of rights in residential care: From legal principles to the youth’s perceptions. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.299 Google Scholar
Martins, C., (2012). Auto-representação na Adolescência: Avaliação e Processo de Construção. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Neto, F. (1993). The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 125134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01536648 Google Scholar
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3 rd Ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Roussos, A., Francis, K., Zoubou, V., Kiprianos, S., Prokopiou, A., & Richardson, C. (2001). The standardization of Achenbach’s youth self-report in Greece in a national sample of high school students. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 10, 4753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007870170046 Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 2374.Google Scholar
Social Security Institute (2013). Annual report of the situation of children and young people in residential care. Lisbon, Portugal: ISS Retrieved from http://www.parlamento.pt/Documents/XIILEG/Abril2013/CASA2012.pdf Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 Google Scholar
Tanti, C., Stukas, A., Halloran, M., & Foddy, M. (2011). Social identity change: Shifts in social identity during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 555567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.012 Google Scholar
Tarrant, M. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11, 110123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00189 Google Scholar
Vorria, P., Wolkind, S., Rutter, M., Pickles, A., & Hobsbaum, A. (1998). A comparative study of Greek children in long-term residential group care and in two-parent families: I Social, emotional and behavioral differences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 225236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00316 Google Scholar