Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:23:13.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women and Vulnerability to Depression: Some Personality and Clinical Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Jesús M. Carrillo ,
Nieves Rojo  and
Arthur W. Staats
Jesús M. Carrillo*
Affiliation:
University Complutense of Madrid
Nieves Rojo
Affiliation:
University Complutense of Madrid
Arthur W. Staats
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to J.M. Carrillo, Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Psicología Clínica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the role of sex differences and personality in vulnerability to depression. Sex differences in personality and some clinical variables are described. We also assess the value of the variables that revealed significant sex differences as predictors of vulnerability to depression. In a group of adult participants (N = 112), 50% males and 50% females (mean age = 41.30; SD = 15.09; range 17- 67), we studied sex differences in the three-factor personality model, using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Form A (EPQ-A; Eysenck & Eysenck, 1975), and in the Five-Factor Personality Model, with the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI; Costa & McCrae, 1985). The following clinical scales were used: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979), the Schizotypy Questionnaire (STQ; Claridge & Broks, 1984; Spanish version, Carrillo & Rojo, 1999), the THARL Scales (Dua, 1989, 1990; Spanish version, Dua & Carrillo, 1994) and the Adjustment Inventory (Bell, 1937; Spanish version, Cerdá, 1980). Subsequently, simple linear regression analysis, with BDI scores as criterion, were performed to estimate the value of the variables as predictors of vulnerability to depression. The results indicate that a series of personality variables cause women to be more vulnerable to depression than men and that these variables could be explained by a negative emotion main factor. Results are discussed within the framework of the psychological behaviorism theory of depression.

En este trabajo se examinó el papel de las diferencias del sexo y de la personalidad en la vulnerabilidad a la depresión. Se describen las diferencias entre sexos en personalidad y en algunas variables clínicas para, posteriormente, analizar el papal de las variables que muestran diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los sexos, como predictoras de la vulnerabilidad a la depresión. Para cumplir con este objetivo, se exploraron extensamente esas diferencias en dos grandes modelos de la personalidad y en algunas escalas clínicas. Nuestros datos se obtuvieron de un grupo de adultos (N = 112), 50% hombres y 50% mujeres (media de edad = 41.30; SD = 15.09; rango 17- 67). Se estudiaron las diferencias entre mujeres y hombres respecto al modelo de 3 factores, utilizando el Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Form A (EPQ; Eysenck & Eysenck, 1975; versión española de TEA, 1986), y el modelo de 5 factores (NEO Personality Inventory - NEO-PI; Costa & McCrae, 1985). Se aplicaron también algunas escalas clínicas: Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1979), Schizotypy Questionnaire (STQ; Claridge & Broks, 1984; versión española de Carrillo y Rojo, 1999), THARL scales (Dua, 1989, 1990; versión española de Dua y Carrillo, 1994), y The Adjustment Inventory (Bell, 1937; versión española: Cuestionario de adaptación para adultos, Cerdá, 1980). Tras estudiar las diferencias según el sexo respecto a estos factores, se estimó su valor de vulnerabilidad a la depresión mediante análisis de regresión lineal simple, siendo la escala BDI de Beck el criterio de depresión. Los resultados mostraron que existe un conjunto de variables que hacen a las mujeres más vulnerables a la depresión que a los hombres. Estas variables podrían explicarse a partir de un factor principal de emocionalidad negativa. Se discuten los resultados en el contexto de la teoría del conductismo psicológico de la depresión.

Keywords

depression in womenpersonalityvulnerabilitysex differencesbehaviorism theory of depressiondepresión en la mujerpersonalidadvulnerabilidaddiferencias según el sexoteoría conductual de la depresión
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 2004 , pp. 29 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2002). Summit on women and depression: Proceedings and recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aragonés, E., Gutiérrez, M.A., Pino, M., Lucena, C., Cervera, J., & Garreta, I. (2001). Prevalencia y características de la depresión mayor y la distimia en atención primaria. Atención Primaria, 27, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avia, M.D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, M.L., Martínez-Arias, M.R., Silva, F., & Graña, J.L. (1995). The Five-Factor Model II: Relations of the NEO-PI with other personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A.T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B.F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Garbin, M.G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, H.M. (1974). The Adjustment Inventory (3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Cerdá's Spanish version: Cuestionario de adaptación para adultos. Barcelona: Herder, 1980).Google Scholar
Bonilla, A., & Martínez-Benlloch, I. (2000). Identidades, transformación de modelos sociales y su incidencia en el ámbito educativo. In Fernández, J. (Ed.), Intervención en los ámbitos de la sexología y de la generología (pp. 135–172). Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Brems, C. (1995). Women and depression: A comprehensive analysis. In Beckham, E.E. & Leber, W.R. (Eds.), Handbook of depression (pp. 539–587). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J.M., & Rojo, N. (1999). Personalidad y salud: neuroticismo y psicoticismo como predictores de salud física. Clínica y Salud, 10, 23–37.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J.M., Rojo, N., & Staats, A.W. (1996). Vulnerable personality in depression: Investigating communality in the search for unification. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G., & Broks, P. (1984). Schizotypy and hemisphere function-I. Theoretical considerations and the measurement of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cuadra, S. (2003). El papel de las emociones positivas y negativas en la predicción de la depresión. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
Dua, J.K. (1989). A scale to measure stress and distress. In Sheppard, J.L. (Ed.), Advances in behavioral medicine (Vol. 6, pp. 111–125). Sydney: Cumberland College of Health Sciences.Google Scholar
Dua, J.K. (1990). Assessment of positive and negative affect as a result of thoughts and real life experiences. Behaviour Change, 7, 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dua, J.K., & Carrillo, J.M. (1994). Escala de pensamientos y experiencias de la vida real: determinando la relación entre afecto y salud. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 20, 213–226.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975). EPQ-Personality Questionnaire for children (EPQ-J) and adults (EPQ-A). London: Hodder and Stoughton. (Spanish version: EPQ-Cuestionario de personalidad para niños (EPJ) y adultos (EPQA). Madrid: TEA, 1986).Google Scholar
Jackson, M., & Claridge, G. (1991). Reliability and validity of a Psychotic Traits Questionnaire (PTQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. (1986). The “self-in-relation”: Implication for depression in women. Psychotherapy, 23, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katon, W., & Sullivan, M.D. (1990). Depression and chronic mental illness. Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 3–14.Google Scholar
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In Olkins, I. (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, E., Keita, G.P., Strickland, B.R., & Russo, N.F. (1991). Women and depression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Mackay, C.J., Cox, T., Burrows, G.C., & Lazzerini, A.J. (1978). An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 283–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappa, S. (1987). Self-esteem, assertiveness, and stress as a function of distress. Unpublished master's thesis, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Silva, F., Avia, M.D., Sanz, J., Martínez-Arias, M.R., Graña, J.L., & Sánchez-Bernardos, M.L. (1994). The Five Factor Model I. Contribution to the structure of the NEO-PI. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 741–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staats, A.W. (1996). Behavior and personality: Psychological behaviorism. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Staats, A.W. (2003). A psychological behaviorism theory of personality. In Millon, T. & Lerner, M.J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol 5. Personality and social psychology (pp.135–158). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staats, A.W., & Heiby, E.M. (1985). Paradigmatic behaviorism's theory of depression: Unified, explanatory, and heuristic. In Reiss, S. & Bootzin, R. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 279–330). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stone, M.H. (1980). The borderline syndromes. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vázquez, C., & Sanz, J. (1991, September). Fiabilidad y validez factorial de la versión española del Inventario de Depresión de Beck. Paper presented at the Third Congress of Psychological Assessment, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Vázquez, C., & Sanz, J. (1997). Fiabilidad y valores normativos de la versión española del inventario para la depresión de Beck de 1978. Clínica y Salud, 8, 403–422.Google Scholar