Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T23:45:25.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triad Model of Education (II) and Instructional Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

E. A. Vargas
E. A. Vargas*
Affiliation:
B. F. Skinner Foundation
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to E. A. Vargas, B. F. Skinner Foundation, Suite 3003, 12 Arrow Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the money and sweat that go into new instructional technologies, they do not produce the overall high level of student performances that societies seek. More effective teaching calls for a profound solution. It requires a coordinate triad of factors: a proper science, the correct organizational structure, and an engineering instructional technology. This second of a series of articles on the Triad Model of Education concentrates on instructional engineering. The instructional engineering drawn from the science is contingency-based. Contingency-based instructional systems always handle the inevitable two components of instruction: the repertoires of students and the setups that shape those repertoires. The setup component features five elements: subject matter, objectives, quality control, presentation modes, and logistics. The repertoire component consists of the governance of repertoires—event and lingual governed, the type of repertoire—knowing, solving, and creating, and the variability of the repertoire—convergent and divergent. These elements, and their required engineering, reveal an instructional task more complex than previously considered. Progress with such complexity occurs only when all components of the triad are in place.

A pesar del dinero y el sudor que forman parte de las nuevas tecnologías instructivas, no producen el alto nivel global de logro por parte de los estudiantes que las sociedades buscan. Una enseñanza más efectiva requiere una solución profunda. Requiere una tríada coordinada de factores: una ciencia adecuada, una estructura organizacional correcta y una tecnología instructiva de ingeniería. Este segundo artículo de una serie de artículos sobre el Modelo Tríada de Educación se centra en la ingeniería instructiva. La ingeniería instructiva extraída de la ciencia se basa en las contingencias. Los sistemas basados en contingencias siempre manejan los dos componentes inevitables de la instrucción: los repertorios de los estudiantes y los contextos o escenarios que dan forma a dichos repertorios. El componente contextual consta de cinco elementos: la asignatura, los objetivos, el control de la calidad, los modos de presentación y la logística. El componente del repertorio consiste en el gobierno de los repertorios—gobernados por eventos y por la lengua, el tipo de repertorio—saber, resolver y crear y la variabilidad del repertorio—convergente y divergente. Estos elementos y su ingeniería necesaria revelan una tarea instructiva más compleja de lo que se había pensado con anterioridad. El progreso con dicha complejidad sólo ocurre cuando todos los componentes de la tríada se encuentran en su lugar.

Keywords

Triad Model of Educationbehaviorologycollaborative organizationcontingency-based instructionmodelo tríada de educaciónconductologíaorganización colaborativainstrucción basada en contingencias
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 314 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fabrizio, M.A., & Moors, A.L. (2003). Evaluating mastery: Measuring instructional outcomes for children with autism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 4, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R. P. (1985). Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman! New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Feynman, M. (Ed.). (2005). Perfectly reasonable deviations: The letters of Richard P. Feynman. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1976). This view of life: Ladders, bushes, and human evolution. Natural History, 85, 24–31.Google Scholar
Greene, J., & Symonds, W.C. (2006). Bill Gates gets schooled. Business Week, 65–70.Google Scholar
Greer, R.D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greer, R.D., & Keohane, D. (2005). The evolution of verbal behavior in children. Behavior Development Bulletin, 1, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtan, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holtan, G. (2005). Victory and vexation in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hursh, D.E., & Tucci, V. (2005). Effective learning environments. In Sugai, G. & Horner, R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavior Modification and Therapy: Vol. III, Educational Applications (pp. 1286–1290). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
James, W. (1882) Psychology. Briefer course. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Latham, G.I. (1999). Management, not “discipline.” Logan, UT: Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center, Utah State University.Google ScholarPubMed
Ley, W. (1968). Dawn of zoology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Liebman, M.N. (2005). An engineering approach to translational medicine. American Scientist, 93, 296–298.Google Scholar
Morison, S.E., Waters, J.J., & Flexner, J.T. (1976). Three great ladies helped create the United States. Smithsonian, 6, 96–100.Google Scholar
Pryor, K. (1975). Lads before the wind. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Reik, T. (1948). Listening with the third ear. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Co.Google Scholar
Skinner, B.F. (1957/2002). Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA.: B. F. Skinner Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Thomas, H., Jamison, W., & Hummel, D. D. (1973). Observation is insufficient for discovering that the surface of still water is invariantly horizontal. Science, 181, 173–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, E.A. (1988). Verbally-governed and event-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, E. (1996). Explanatory frameworks and the thema of agency. Behaviorology, 4, 30–42.Google Scholar
Vargas, E.A. (November, 2004). The triad of science foundations, instructional technology, and organizational structure. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 7, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, J.S. (in press). Applied behavior analysis for educators. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar