Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:10:00.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subliminal Messages for Increasing Self-Esteem: Placebo Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Manuel Froufe*
Affiliation:
Autonomous Universityof Madrid
Cecilia Schwartz
Affiliation:
New Age Consulting, S.L.
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Manuel Froufe, Facultad de Psicología.Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Cantoblanco. 28049 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Although experimental research has confirmed the capacity of the human cognitive system to process information that does not reach consciousness (unconscious perception), empirical evidence of the incidence of subliminal verbal messages included on audiotapes claiming to improve human resources and correct some behavioral problems is meager and inconsistent. Our study assesses the influence of “subliminal tapes” designed to increase self-esteem. Participants were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions. One group listened to a tape of music with supra- and subliminal messages; another listened to a tape of music with only subliminal messages; the third group's tape had only music, although the participants believed that it also included subliminal messages; a fourth (“waiting”) group heard no tapes, but filled in the same self-esteem scales. Participants in the first three groups filled in the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (Fitts, 1965) before and after listening to the tape for several days. All groups showed a similar pretest-posttest improvement in self-esteem (p ≤ .003), except for the waiting group, which did not improve (p = .311). This implies that only a placebo effect took place. Our data are not in accordance with those obtained by other authors. We comment upon the possible reasons for these discrepancies.

Aunque la investigación experimental ha constatado la capacidad del sistema cognitivo humano para procesar información que no accede a la conciencia (percepción inconsciente), los datos empíricos sobre la incidencia de los mensajes verbales subliminales incluidos en cintas de audio, comercializadas para potenciar los recursos humanos y corregir algunos problemas conductuales, son muy escasos e inconsistentes. Nuestro estudio evalúa la influencia de “mensajes subliminales”, grabados en cinta, diseñados para mejorar la autoestima. Los sujetos fueron asignados aleatoriamente a cuatro condiciones experimentales. Un grupo escuchó una cinta con música y mensajes supra y subliminales; otro, una cinta con música y mensajes subliminales únicamente; en la tercera condición la cinta sólo contenía música, si bien los sujetos creían que también incluía mensajes subliminales; un cuarto grupo (“de espera”) fue sometido a las mismas mediciones de autoestima, pero no recibió la cinta. Los participantes de los tres primeros grupos completaron la Escala Tennessee de Autoconcepto (Fitts, 1965) antes y después de haber escuchado la cinta durante varios días. Todos los grupos mostraron una mejora similar entre el pretest y el postest de autoestima (p ≤ .003), salvo el de espera, que no mejoró (p = .311). Ello implica que únicamente tiene lugar efecto placebo. Nuestros datos contradicen los obtenidos por algunos otros autores. Se analizan las posibles razones de estas discrepancias.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, H.C. (1966). Apparatus for producing visual and auditory stimulation. United States Patent N° 3,278,676.Google Scholar
Becker, H.C., Charbonnet, K.D., Marino, D.R., Steck, C.G., & Warren, E.S. (1980). Subliminal communication: New processors for therapy, industry, and education. Demonstration exhibited at the 33rd Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1995). Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 5467.Google ScholarPubMed
Borgeat, F., Boissonneault, J., Chalout, L., & Elie, R. (1989). Psychophysiological responses to subliminal auditory suggestions for activation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 759765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, R., & Pittman, T. (Eds.). (1992). Perception without awareness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chimera, D.M. (1987). An exploration of the effect of auditory subliminal stimuli on schizophrenic pathology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 1509B.Google Scholar
Costello, R.B., & Budzynski, T. (1991, June). Subliminal audiotapes as a psychotherapeutic modality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Preconscious Learning, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P-F., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doche-Budzynski, L., & Budzynski, T. (1989). Subliminal self-esteem enhancement in adult Type A males. Education, 10, 5055.Google Scholar
Draine, S., & Greenwald, A.G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkin, K. (1998). Implicit content and implicit processes in mass media use. In Kirsner, K., Speelman, C., Maybery, M., O'Brien-Malone, A., MAnderson, ., & MacLeod, C., (Eds.), Implicit and explicit mental processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fitts, W.H. (1965). Tennessee Self-Concept Scale: Manual. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recording and Test.Google Scholar
Froufe, M. (1997). El inconsciente cognitivo: la cara oculta de la mente. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
Garanto, J. (1984). Las actitudes hacia sí mismo y su medición. Barcelona: EU Temas de Psicología 7.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A.G., Spangenberg, E.R., Pratkanis, A.R., & Skenazi, J. (1991). Double blind tests of subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychological Science, 2, 119122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, I. (Ed.). (1999). How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, I., & Sapirstein, G. (1999). Listening to Prozac but hearing placebo: A meta-analysis of antidepressant medication. In Kirsch, I.. (Ed.), How expectancies shape experience (pp. 303320). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzé, H.F., & Möller, A.T. (1990). Effect of auditory subliminal stimulation on GSR. Psychological Reports, 67, 931934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenz, S. (1989). The effects of subliminal auditory stimuli on academic learning and motor skills performance among police recruits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology.Google Scholar
Merikle, P.M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J.A. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merikle, P.M., & Skanes, H.E. (1992). Subliminal self-help audiotapes: A search for placebo effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 772776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, R. (1991). Subliminal audio as an adjunct to traditional twelve-step oriented treatment for chemical dependency-pilot project. Philadelphia, PA: Livegrin Foundation.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S.L. (1988). Behavioral implications of information presented outside of conscious awareness: The effect of subliminal presentation of trait information on behavior in the prisoner's dilemma game. Social Cognition, 6, 207230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A., & Soares, J. (1998). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: Expectancies for aversive outcomes following nonrecognized fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 6982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittman, T.S., & Bornstein, R.F. (1989, April). Nonconscious biasing effects in hiring decisions. Communication presented to the LX Annual Conference of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Prioleau, L., Murdock, M., & Brody, N. (1983). An analysis of psychotherapy versus placebo studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 275310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. (1990). Free of depression: Subliminal tape study. Unpublished master's thesis, Colorado State University, CO.Google Scholar
Russell, T., Rowe, W., & Smouse, A. (1991). Subliminal self-help tapes and academic achievement: An evaluation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 359362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, L.H. (1983). The subliminal psychodynamic activation method: Overview and comprehensive listing of studies. In Masling, J. (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories. (Vol. 1, pp. 69100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swingle, P.G. (1992). Subliminal treatment procedures: A clinicians' guide. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1988). Subliminal learning: An eclectic approach. Salt Lake City, UT: Just Another Reality.Google Scholar
Urban, M.J. (1992). Auditory subliminal stimulation: A re-examination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 515541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vila, J., & Tudela, P. (1982). Procesamiento semántico no consciente durante una tarea de atención dicótica. Psicológica, 3, 523.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. (1997). Consciousness lost and found: A neuropsychological exploration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar