Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:13:33.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Norms and Prejudice against Homosexuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Annelyse Pereira ,
Maria Benedicta Monteiro  and
Leoncio Camino
Annelyse Pereira*
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa ISCTE (Portugal)
Maria Benedicta Monteiro
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa ISCTE (Portugal)
Leoncio Camino
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (Brazil)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Annelyse Pereira, Rua: dos Escritores, 7, 1° B, 2685-207, Portela LRS, (Portugal). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Different studies regarding the role of norms on the expression of prejudice have shown that the anti-prejudice norm influences people to inhibit prejudice expressions. However, if norm pressure has led to a substantial decrease in the public expression of prejudice against certain targets (e.g., blacks, women, blind people), little theoretical and empirical attention has been paid to the role of this general norm regarding sexual minorities (e.g., prostitutes, lesbians and gays). In this sense, the issue we want to address is whether general anti-prejudice norms can reduce the expression of prejudice against homosexual individuals. In this research we investigate the effect of activating an anti-prejudice norm against homosexuals on blatant and subtle expressions of prejudice. The anti-prejudice norm was experimentally manipulated and its effects were observed on rejection to intimacy (blatant prejudice) and on positive-negative emotions (subtle prejudice) regarding homosexuals. 136 university students were randomly allocated to activated-norm and control conditions and completed a questionnaire that included norm manipulation and the dependent variables. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) as well as subsequent ANOVAS showed that only in the high normative pressure condition participants expressed less rejection to intimacy and less negative emotions against homosexuals, when compared to the simple norm-activation and the control conditions. Positive emotions, however, were similar both in the high normative pressure and the control conditions. We concluded that a high anti-prejudice pressure regarding homosexuals could reduce blatant prejudice but not subtle prejudice, considering that the expression of negative emotions decreased while the expression of positive emotions remained stable.

Diversos estudios acerca del papel que juegan las normas en la expresión del prejuicio han mostrado que la norma anti-prejuicio influye a las personas para que inhiban las expresiones de prejuicio. Sin embargo, si bien la presión de una norma ha llevado a un descenso sustancial de la expresión pública del prejuicio contra determinados objetivos (e.g., negros, mujeres, personas ciegas), se ha prestado poca atención teórica y empírica al rol de esta norma general con respecto a las minorías sexuales (e.g., prostitutas, lesbianas y gays). En este sentido, la cuestión que queremos abordar es si las normas generales anti-prejuicio pueden reducir la expresión del prejuicio contra los individuos homosexuales. En esta investigación examinamos el efecto de activar una norma anti-prejuicio contra los homosexuales sobre las expresiones abiertas y sutiles de prejuicio. La norma anti-prejuicio se manipuló experimentalmente y se observaron sus efectos sobre el rechazo a la intimidad (prejuicio abierto) y las emociones positivas y negativas (prejuicio sutil) con respecto a los homosexuales. Se asignaron al azar a 136 estudiantes universitarios a las condiciones norma-activada y control y completaron un cuestionario que incluía la manipulación de la norma y las variables dependientes. Un análisis de varianza multivariado (MANOVA) y ANOVAs subsiguientes mostraron que sólo en la condición de alta presión normativa los participantes expresaron menos rechazo a la intimidad y menos emociones negativas contra los homosexuales, comparados con las condiciones de activación simple de la norma y control. Sin embargo, las emociones positivas eran similares tanto en las condiciones de alta presión normativa como en la del control. Concluimos que la alta presión anti-prejuicio hacia de los homosexuales podría reducir el prejuicio abierto pero no el prejuicio sutil, considerando que la expresión de las emociones negativas descendió mientras que la expresión de las emociones positivas se mantuvo estable.

Keywords

prejudicesocial normshomosexualityemotionsprejuicionormas socialeshomosexualidademociones
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 576 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice (25 ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Brandyberry, L. J., & MacNair, R. R. (1996). The content and function of attitudes toward AIDS. Journal of College Student Developmente, 37, 335–346Google Scholar
Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Theno, S. A. (1996). Violating American values: A “value congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(4), 387–410.Google Scholar
Camino, L., & Pereira, C. (2000). O papel da Psicologia na construção dos direitos humanos: Análise das teorias e práticas psicológicas na discriminação do homossexualismo. Perfil, 13(13), 49–69.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. T. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosby, F., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87(3), 546–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijker, A. J. (1989). Ethnic attitudes and emotions. In van Oudenhoven, J. P. & Willemsen, T. M. (Eds.), Ethnic minorities: social psychological perspectives (pp. 77–96). Amsterdã: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939/1967). Frustration and aggression (14 ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. In Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 1–34). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racism biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326.Google Scholar
França, D. X., & Monteiro, M. B. (2004). As novas expressões de racismo na infância. In Lima, M. E. & Pereira, M. E. (Eds.), Estereótipos, preconceito e discriminação: Perspectivas teóricas e metodológicas (pp. 139–160). Salvador: EDUFBA.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J., & McEneaney, E. H. (1999). The individualization of society and the liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces, 77(3), 911–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guglielmi, R. S. (1999). Psychophysiological assessment of prejudice: Past research, current status, and future directions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 123–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: do heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 251–266.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (1995). Social psychology. Londres: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hogan, T., & Rentz, A. L. (1996). Homophobia in the academy. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 309–314.Google Scholar
Katz, I., Wackenhut, J., & Hass, R. G. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. In Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 35–59). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.Google Scholar
Lacerda, M., Pereira, C., & Camino, L (2002). Um estudo sobre as formas de preconceito contra os homossexuais na perspectiva das representações sociais. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 15(1), 165–178.Google Scholar
Leyens, J.-P., & Dardenne, B. (1996). Basic concepts and approaches in social cognitions. In Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W. & Sterphenson, G. M. (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective (pp. 109–134). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lima, M. E. (2002). Normas sociais e racismo: Efeitos do individualismo meritocrático e do igualitarismo na infra-humanização dos negros. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, ISCTE, Lisbon University Institute, Lisboa.Google Scholar
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(4), 563–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meertens, R. W., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1999). Será o racismo subtil mesmo racismo? In Vala, J. (Ed.), Novos racismos: Perspectivas comparativas (pp. 11–29). Oeiras: Celta.Google Scholar
Minard, R. D. (1952). Race relations in the Pocahontas coal field. Journal of Social Issues, VIII, 29–44.Google Scholar
Monteith, M. J., Deneen, N. E., & Tooman, G. D. (1996). The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(3), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, A. (2004). Representações sociais do homossexualismo e preconceito contra homossexuais. Unpublished Master dissertation, Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia.Google Scholar
Pereira, C., Torres, A. R. R., & Pereira, A. (2004). Preconceito contra prostitutas e representações sociais da prostituição em estudantes de teologia católicos e evangélicos. In Lima, M. E. & Pereira, M. E. (Eds.), Estereótipos, preconceito e discriminação: Perspectivas teóricas e metodológicas (pp. 209–234). Salvador: EDUFBA.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and social-cultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 29–42.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1959). Regional differences in anti-Negro prejudice. In Aronson, E. & Pratkanis, A. R. (Eds.), Social Psychology III (pp. 359–367). Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1999). A sistematização dos preditores do racismo: Uma perspectiva empírica. In Vala, J. (Ed.), Novos racismos: Perspectivas comparativas (pp. 79–101). Oeiras: Celta.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Markman, K. D., & Snyder, C. J. (2006). Gender differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: The role of motivation to respond without prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1325–1338.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1992). On social representations of emotional experience: stereotypes, prototypes, or archetypes. In von Cranach, M., Doise, W. & M. G., (Eds.), Social representations and the social bases of knowledge (pp. 30–36). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936/1964). The psychology of social norms (1a Torchbook, Harper ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1967). Social interaction: processes and products. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & Blackwood, L. (2001). Prejudiced attitudes, group norms, and discriminatory behaviour. In Augoustinos, M. & Reynolds, K. J. (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict (pp. 140–158). Londres: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vala, J. (1997). Representações sociais e percepções intergrupais. Análise Social, 32(1), 7–29.Google Scholar
Vala, J., Brito, R., & Lopes, D. (1999). Expressões dos racismos em Portugal. Lisboa: University of Lisbon, Instituto de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
Vala, J., Lima, M. E., & Pereira, C. (2006). The role of egalitarianism and meritocratic individualism norms on the depersonalization of Black people: CIS/ISCTE, Lisbon University Institute.Google Scholar
Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45(11/12), 692–721.Google Scholar
Wood, W., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 523–535.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology 4 ed., Vol. 2, pp. 591–632. Nova York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar