Article contents
Short-Term Effects of the Empathic Talk: The Role of Perceived Empathy, Interpersonal Dispositions, and Vagal Tone on Experiencing Depth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2017
Abstract
The present study examines the immediate impact of empathic attitudes on the receiver, by comparing an empathic conversation (EC) with a neutral one (NC) on experiencing depth (EXP), perceived empathy and vagal tone. We also evaluate if empathy effects depend on personality dispositions relevant to interpersonal functioning. An experimental, counterbalanced, within-subject design was implemented wherein participants (n = 27, age M = 22.6, SD = 4.0, 52% females) talked about a personal, meaningful topic for 20 minutes under both the EC and NC conditions. At the group level, main results indicated that the EC was more effective than the NC in promoting increases in EXP over time (F(1, 25) = 21.04, p < .001, ηp2 = .457) and perceived empathy in women (F(1, 25) = 9.42, p = .005, ηp2 = .264). At the individual level, the NC particularly precluded EXP gains in people expressing a better interpersonal functioning (βs < –.46, ps < .05 for attachment security and empathy and β = .38, p < .05 for aggression), and who also inhibited their vagal tone throughout this very condition (β = .40, p = .024). We conclude that the empathic context has an immediate positive impact on healthy psychological variables, whereas a more impersonal setting would drive people away from this positive effect. Those results are discussed in the light of the role of interpersonal proximity (being empathic to another’s experience and the lack of this attitude) in psychotherapy and healthy functioning.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017
Footnotes
Dufey, M., & Wilson, J. E. (2017). Short-term effects of the empathic talk: the role of perceived empathy, interpersonal dispositions, and vagal tone on experiencing depth. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. e61. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2017.58
References
- 5
- Cited by