Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:36:27.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychopathology According to Behaviorism: A Radical Restatement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Marino Pérez-Álvarez
Marino Pérez-Álvarez*
Affiliation:
University of Oviedo
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marino Pérez-Álvarez, Departamento de Psicología.Universidad de Oviedo. Plaza de Feijoo s/n. 33003- Oviedo (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a radical restatement of the predominant psychopathology, which is characterized by nosological systems and by its approach towards a neurobiological conception of the so-called mental disorders. The “radical” sense of this restatement is that of radical behaviorism itself. As readers will recall, “radical” applied to behaviorism means total (not ignoring anything that interests psychology), pragmatic (referring to the practical sense of knowledge), and it also derives from the Latin word for “root” (and thus implies change beginning at a system's roots or getting to the root of things, in this case, of psychological disorders). Based on this, I introduce the Aristotelian distinction of material and form, which, besides being behaviorist avant la lettre, is used here as a critical instrument to unmask the hoax of psychopathology as it is presented. The implications of this restatement are discussed, some of them already prepared for clinical practice.

Se hace un replanteamiento radical de la psicopatología dominante, caracterizada por los sistemas nosológicos y por su abocamiento a una concepción neurobiológica de los llamados trastornos mentales. El sentido ‘radical’ de este replanteamiento no es otro que el propio del conductismo radical. Como se recordará, ‘radical’ aplicado al conductismo quiere decir total (sin dejar de estudiar nada que interese a la psicología), pragmático (referido al sentido práctico del conocimiento) y de raíz (yendo a la raíz de las cosas, en este caso de los trastornos psicológicos). Sobre esta base, se introduce la distinción aristotélica de materia y forma que, además de ser conductista avant la lettre, sirve aquí de instrumento crítico para desenmascarar el tinglado de la psicopatología según está dado. Se señalan las implicaciones de este replanteamiento, algunas prestas ya para la práctica clínica.

Keywords

Aristotelian causesradical behaviorismlife's problemspsy-complexpsychological disordersnosological systemcausas aristotélicasconductismo radicalproblemas de la vidapsy-complextrastornos psicológicossistema nosológico
Type
Complutense University Celebration of B.F. Skinner's Centennial (1904-2004)
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , November 2004 , pp. 171 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3d ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., revised). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
Bentall, R., Jackson, H.F., & Pilgrim, D. (1998). Abandoning the concept of “schizophrenia”: Some implications of validity argument for psychological research into psychotic phenomena. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 3003–3024.Google Scholar
Berrios, G.E. (1996). The history of mental symptoms. Descriptive psychopathology since the nineteenth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Ph. (1995). Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. [Special Issue]. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devereux, G. (1970). Essais d'ethnopsychiatrie generale Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freemantle, N., Anderson, I.M., & Young, P. (2000). Predictive value of psychopharmacological activity for relative efficacy of antidepressant drugs. Meta-regression analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, J.B. (this issue). About the purpose of the first centennial of the birth of B. F. Skinner: Philosophical critique of radical behaviorism.Google Scholar
Fuentes, J. B., & Quiroga, E. (2004). Los dos principios irrenunciables del análisis de la conducta y del conductismo radical. Psicothema, 16, 4, in press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Posthuman society. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & GirouxGoogle Scholar
Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture. Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Rotledge.Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Horwitz, A.V. (2002). Creating mental illness. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, P.D. (1993). Listening to Prozac. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Linton, R. (1936/1972). Estudio del hombre. México: FCE.Google Scholar
McLean, A. (1990). Contradictions in the social production of clinical knowledge: The case of schizophrenia. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 969–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. (1995). Some historical and conceptual relations among logical positivism, behaviorism, and cognitive psychology. In Todd, J. T. & Morris, E. K. (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism (pp. 51–74). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994). The therapy of desire. Theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donohue, W., & Kitchener, R. (Eds.) (1999). Handbook of behaviorism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Orlinsky, D.E. (1989). Researchers' images of psychotherapy: Their origins and influence on research. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (1998). La psicología clínica desde el punto de vista contextual. Papeles del Psicólogo, 69, 25–40.Google Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (1996). Tratamientos psicológicos. Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2003). Las cuatro causas de los trastornos psicológicos. Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2004). Contingencia y drama. La psicología según el conductismo. Madrid: Minerva.Google Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M., Fernández Hermida, J.R., Fernández Rodríguez, C., & Amigo Vázquez, I. (2003). Camino recorrido y tarea futura de los tratamientos psicológicos. In Álvarez, M. Pérez, Hermida, J.R. Fernández, Rodríguez, C. Fernández, & Vázquez, I. Amigo (Eds.), Guía de tratamientos psicológicos eficaces (vol. 3, pp. 215–236). Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Pignarre, Ph. (2001). Comment la depression est devenue une epidemie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, D., & Bentall, R. (1999). The medicalization of misery: A critical realist analysis of the concept of depression. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 261–274.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1997). A history of psychiatry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1945/1988). The operational analysis of psychological terms. In Catania, A.Ch. & Harnad, S. (Eds.), The selection of behavior. The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (pp. 150–164). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valenstein, E.S. (1998). Blaming the brain. The truth about drugs and mental health. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
van Praag, H.M. (1993). ‘Make-believes’ in psychiatry or the perils of progress. (Clinical and Experimental Psychiatry, n° 7). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
van Praag, H.M. (1997). Over the mainstream: Diagnostic requirements for biological psychiatric research. Psychiatry Research, 72, 2001–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, K.G., & Luciano, M.C. (2002). Terapia de aceptación y compromiso (ACT). Una terapia conductual orientada a valores. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2001). Psychiatric disorders are not natural kinds. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 7, 167–182.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2003). The practical kinds model as a pragmatist theory of classification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 9, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar