Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:21:20.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Thougth-Shape Fusion Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Ignacio Jáuregui Lobera ,
Miguel Angel Santed ,
Roz Shafran ,
María José Santiago  and
Sonia Estébanez
Ignacio Jáuregui Lobera*
Affiliation:
Universidad Pablo de Olavide (Spain)
Miguel Angel Santed
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
Roz Shafran
Affiliation:
University of Reading (UK)
María José Santiago
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias de la Conducta (Spain)
Sonia Estébanez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias de la Conducta (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ignacio Jáuregui Lobera. Virgen del Monte 31. 41011 Sevilla (Spain). Phone: +34 954280789. Fax: +34 954278167. E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to analyze the psychometric properties, factor structure and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Thought-Shape Fusion Questionnaire (TSF-Q), as well as to determine its validity by evaluating the relationship of the TSF-Q to different instruments.

Two groups were studied: one comprising 146 patients with a diagnosis of anorexia (n = 82), bulimia (n = 33) or unspecified eating disorder (n = 31), and another group of 115 undergraduates with no history of psychological disorder. All participants completed the TSF-Q, TAF-Q, EDI-2, STAI, BDI and SCL-90-R. Differences in TSF-Q scores between the diagnostic subgroups were also analyzed.

Two factors were obtained which coincided with the two sections indicated by the authors of the questionnaire: conceptual and interpretative. The internal consistency of the TSF-Q and its subscales was determined by means of Cronbach's alpha, with values ranging between .93 and .96. The correlations with other instruments reflected adequate validity. There were no significant differences between the diagnostic subgroups.

The Spanish version of the TSF-Q meets the psychometric requirements for measuring thought-shape fusion and shows adequate internal consistency and validity.

Los objetivos del estudio fueron analizar las características psicométricas del Thougt-Shape Fusion Questionnaire (TSF-Q), su estructura factorial y consistencia interna, así como las relaciones del TSFQ con diferentes instrumentos para determinar su validez.

Se estudiaron 146 pacientes con anorexia (n = 82), bulimia (n = 33) o trastorno de la conducta alimentaria no especificado (n = 31), y un grupo de 115 estudiantes sin antecedentes de interés psicopatológico. Todos completaron el TSF-Q, TAF-Q, EDI-2, STAI, BDI y SCL-90-R. Las diferencias en las puntuaciones del TSF-Q entre los subgrupos diagnósticos fueron también analizadas.

Se obtuvieron dos factores, coincidentes con las dos secciones conceptual e interpretativa señaladas por los autores del cuestionario. La consistencia interna del TSF-Q y de sus subescalas se determinó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, que osciló entre .93 y .96. Las correlaciones con otros instrumentos reflejaron una adecuada validez. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los subgrupos diagnósticos.

El TSF-Q, en su versión española, cubre los requisitos psicométricos para medir la fusión pensamientoforma y presenta adecuada consistencia interna, así como una adecuada validez.

Keywords

thought-shape fusioneating disorderscognitive distortionpsychometric validationfusión pensamiento-formatrastornos de la conducta alimentariadistorsión cognitivavalidación psicométrica
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 410 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, J. S., Whiteside, S., Lynam, D., & Kalsy, S. (2003). Is thought-action fusion specific to obsessive-compulsive disorder? A mediating role of negative affect. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1069–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00243-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2002). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed. revised). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Berle, D., & Starcevic, V. (2005). Thought-action fusion: Review of the literature and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 263–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1996). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1173–1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erlbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, D. M. (1999). Anxiety disorders: Why they persist and how to treat them. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, J. S., Carter, J. C., McFarlane, T., & Polivy, J. (2008). “Just looking at food makes me gain weight”: Experimental induction of thought-shape fusion in eating-disordered and non eating-disordered women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 219–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conde, V. & Franch, J. I. (1984). Escalas de evaluación comportamental para la cuantificación de la sintomatología psicopatológica en los trastornos angustiosos y depresivos [Behavioral rating scales for quantifying psychopathological symptoms in anxiety and depressive disorders]. Madrid, Spain: Upjohn Farmaquímica.Google Scholar
Cooper, Z. & Fairburn, C. G. (1992). Thoughts about eating, weight and shape in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 501–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90034-ECrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cota, A. A., Longman, R. S., Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Xinaris, S. (1993). Interpolating 95th percentile eigenvalues from random data: An empirical example. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53, 585–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derogatis, L. R. (1983). The SCL-90-R. Administration. Scoring and procedures. Manual-II for the R(evised) version. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D., & Bemis, K. (1982). A cognitive behavioral approach to anorexia nervosa. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 123–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01183887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700030762CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D. M.(1998). Inventario de trastornos de la conducta alimentaria-2 [Eating Disorder Inventory-2]. Madrid, Spain: Tea Ediciones.Google Scholar
Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn's parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González de Rivera, J. L., Derogatis, L.R., de las Cuevas, C., Gracia Marco, R., Rodríguez-Pulido, F., Henry-Benítez, M., & Monterrey, A. L. (1989). The Spanish version of the SCL-90-R. Normative data in the general population. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.65.4.599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, O. P., & Soto, C. J. (2007). The importance of being valid. Reliability and the process of construct validation. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 461–494). Nueva York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. E., Pyle, R. L., Eckert, E. D., Hatsukami, D., Pomeroy, C., & Zimmerman, R. A. (1990). A comparison study of antidepressants and structured intensive group psychotherapy in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 149–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810140049008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizes, J. S., Christiano, B., Madison, J., Post, G., Seime, R., & Varnado, P.(2000). Development of the Mizes anorectic cognitions questionnaire-revised: Psychometric properties and factor structure in a large sample of eating disorders patients. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 415–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(200012)28:4<415::AIDEAT9>3.3.CO;2-Q3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachman, S. (1993). Obsessions, responsibility and guilt. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(93)90066-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachman, S., & Shafran, R. (1999). Cognitive distortions: Thoughtaction fusion. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 80–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199905)6:2<80::AID-CPP188>3.0.CO;2-C3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radomsky, A. S., de Silva, P., Todd, G., Treasure, J., & Murphy, T. (2002). Thought-shape fusion in anorexia nervosa: An experimental investigation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1169–1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00085-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkovskis, P. M., Wroe, A. L., Gledhill, A., Morrison, N., Forrester, E., Richards, C., … Thorpe, S. (2000). Responsibility attitudes and interpretations are characteristics of obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 347–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00071-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seisdedos, N. (1982). STAI: Inventario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo [State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
Shafran, R., & Robinson, P. (2004). Thought-shape fusion in eating disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 399–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0144665042389008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafran, R., Teachman, B. A., Kerry, S., & Rachman, S. (1999). A cognitive distortion associated with eating disorders: Thought-shape fusion. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 167–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466599162728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafran, R., Thordarson, D. S., & Rachman, S. (1996). Thoughtaction fusion in obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 379–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(96)00018-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar