Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:49:07.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of the Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory in Chinese Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2015

Wen Liu ,
Liang Chen ,
Ying Yang  and
Shuai Zhang
Wen Liu*
Affiliation:
Liaoning Normal University (China)
Liang Chen
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology Liaoning (China)
Ying Yang
Affiliation:
Liaoning Normal University (China)
Shuai Zhang
Affiliation:
Liaoning Normal University (China)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Wen Liu. College of Psychology. Liaoning Normal University. Dalian (China). 116029. Phone: +860411–82156432(13478663570). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a Chinese adaption of the Formal Characteristics of the Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI), a self-report instrument that evaluates six temperamental scales, based on Strelau’s concept of temperament. A first sample of 626 undergraduates completed the Chinese version of the Regulative Theory of Temperament Questionnaire (RTTQ), which is an initial pool of 381 items. Internal consistency suggests adequate reliability (.66 to .82), and an exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-factor solution consistent with the original instrument. A follow-up confirmatory factor analysis revealed good support for the temperament structure with a second sample of students (N = 2.980). Internal consistency and factorial structure were re-examined (Cronbach’s alpha ranged .64 to .85), and test-retest correlations over a two-week period ranged from .82 to .96 with a third sample of adults (N = 2.265). Convergent and discriminant validity was explored in relation to the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revision Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC) model dimensions. Results indicate that the Chinese version of the FCB-TI has similar psychometric properties and generally satisfactory reliability and validity.

Keywords

FCB-TIpsychometric propertiestemperamental scales
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E73
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, A., & Blanch, A. (2011). The five and seven factors personality models: Differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 659–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.14 Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burisch, M. (1986). Methods of personality inventory development-A comparative analysis. Personality Assessment Via Questionnaires, 1, 109–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_6 Google Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 Google Scholar
Crowley, S. L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 508–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_4 Google Scholar
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.1.1.16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pascalis, V., Zawadzki, B., & Strelau, J. (2000). The Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Preliminary results of the Italian version. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 287–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00097-5 Google Scholar
Dragan, W. Ł., & Oniszczenko, W. (2005). Polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter gene and their relationship to two temperamental traits measured by the Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory: Activity and emotional reactivity. Neuropsychobiology, 51, 269–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000085823 Google Scholar
Dragan, W. Ł., Oniszczenko, W., Czerski, P. M., & Dmitrzak-Węglarz, M. (2012). Dopamine genes and sensory sensitivity as a temperamental trait: A family-based association study. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 205–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000069 Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. J. (1996). Manual of the Eysenck personality profiler (short). Surrey, UK: Psi-Press.Google Scholar
Fajkowska, M. (2013). Personality coherence and incoherence: A perspective on anxiety and depression. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner.Google Scholar
Fajkowska, M., Wytykowska, A., & Riemann, R. (2012). A step toward further validation of the regulative theory of temperament. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 193–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruehstorfer, D. B., Veronie, L., Cremeans-Smith, J. K., & Newberry, B. H. (2012). Predicting Illness-Related Outcomes with FCB-TI Trait Pairs. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 248–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164 Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147 Google Scholar
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485 Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 Google Scholar
Laverdière, O., Diguer, L., Gamache, D., & Evans, D. E. (2010). The French adaptation of the short form of the Adult Temperament Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 212–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 Google Scholar
Oniszczenko, W., Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2003). Genetic and environmental determinants of temperament: A comparative study based on Polish and German samples. European Journal of Personality, 17, 207–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.472 Google Scholar
Qian, M., Wu, G., Zhu, R., & Zhang, S. (2000). 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订 [Development of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC)]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 317–323.Google Scholar
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124 Google Scholar
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 Google Scholar
Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH (computer program manual). Evanston, IL: Systat.Google Scholar
Strelau, J. (1987). The concept of temperament in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 1, 107–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010205 Google Scholar
Strelau, J. (1996). The regulative theory of temperament: Current status. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00159-X Google Scholar
Strelau, J. (1998). Temperament: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Strelau, J., & Plomin, R. (2008). Temperament as a regulator of behavior: After fifty years of research. Clinton Corner, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.Google Scholar
Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1993). The formal characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Theoretical assumptions and scale construction. European Journal of Personality, 7, 313–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070504 Google Scholar
Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1995). The formal characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality, 9, 207–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090304 Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89 Google Scholar
Zawadzki, B., & Popiel, A. (2012). Temperamental traits and severity of PTSD symptoms: Data from longitudinal studies of motor vehicle accident survivors. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000074 Google Scholar
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Oniszczenko, W. O., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on temperament. European Psychologist, 6, 272–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.6.4.272 Google Scholar
Zawadzki, B., van de Vijver, F. Jr., Angleitner, A., de Pascalis, V., Newberry, B., Clark, W., ... Kufel, M. (2001). The comparison of two basic approaches of cross-cultural assessment of Strelau's temperament dimensions in eight countries. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32, 133–141.Google Scholar