Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:25:06.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–S–9) in High-school Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2019

Cristina Serrano ,
Yolanda Andreu ,
Sergio Murgui  and
Paula Martínez
Cristina Serrano*
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Yolanda Andreu
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Sergio Murgui
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Paula Martínez
Affiliation:
Universidad Internacional de Valencia (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Cristina Serrano. Universidad de Valencia. Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos. Avenida Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010 Valencia (Spain).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) is a self-report instrument widely used, both in the original and its abbreviated version of nine items, to assess the work -UWES, UWES–9– and academic engagement -UWES-S, UWES–S–9–. The present study examines factor structure of the UWES–S–9 using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), its convergent validity and invariance across sex and age groups in a sample of 626 Spanish high school students. The results support an unidimensional conceptualization of engagement (S-Bχ2/df = 5.29; CFI = .96; NNFI = .94; RMSEA = .083; IFI = .96; AIC = 82.21; BIC = 267.38), revealed an essentially invariant structure of the UWES–S–9 across the sex, ΔS-Bχ2(Δ6) = 10.67; p ≤ .05, and age, ΔS-Bχ2(Δ7) = 9.67; p ≤ .05, and confirmed the positive association between academic engagement and achievement (r = .30; p ≤ .001), dispositional optimism (r = .21; p ≤ .001), and subjective well-being (r = .16; p ≤ .001), and the negative association with perceived stress (r =. –13; p ≤ .001). In short, the Spanish version of UWES–S–9 is presented as a brief, reliable and valid tool to measure academic engagement in high school students (α = .91, AVE = .52, Ω = .911).

Keywords

academic engagementfactorial and convergent validityfactorial invariancehigh-school studentsUWES–S–9
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 22 , 2019 , E21
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article:

Serrano, C., Andreu, Y., Murgui, S., & Martínez, P. (2019). Psychometric properties of Spanish version student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–S–9) in high-school students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. e21. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2019.25.

References

Bakker, A., Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., & Taris, T. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. http://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balducci, C., Fraccaroli, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–9): A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 143–149. http://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkhuizen, N., Rothmann, S., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education institutions: Effects of dispositional optimism. Stress & Health, 30(4), 322–332. http://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benevides-Pereira, A. M., Fraiz de Camargo, D., & Porto-Martins, P. (2009). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Spanish manual. Retrieved from https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Test%20Manuals/Test_manual_UWESEspanol.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
Cadime, I., Lima, S., Marques-Pinto, A., & Ribeiro, I. (2016). Measurement invariance of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students: A study across secondary school pupils and university students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1148595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çapri, B., Gündüz, B., & Akbay, S. E. (2017). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale- Student Forms’ (UWES-SF) Adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability studies, and the mediator role of work engagement between academic procrastination and academic responsibility. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 411–435. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0518Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., & Montero-Bancalero, F. J. (2017). Características psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala UWES-S en estudiantes universitarios de fisioterapia [Psychometrics of the Spanish version of the UWES-S Scale in physiotherapy college students]. Fisioterapia, 39(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ft.2016.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, M. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2007). Work engagement: A meta-analytic review and directions for research in an emerging area. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26536346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., de Jonge, J., Janssen, P. P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27, 279–286. http://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Extremera, N., Fernández-Berrocal, P., González-Herrero, V., & Cabello, R. (2009). Una validación preliminar de la versión española de la Subjective Happiness Scale [Preliminary validation of the Spanish version of the Subjective Happiness Scale]. In Fernández- Berrocal, P. (Ed.), Avances en el estudio de la inteligencia emocional [Advances in the study of emotional intelligence] (pp. 39– 44). Santander, Spain: Fundación Marcelino Botín.Google Scholar
Fong, T. C.-t, & Ng, S.-m. (2012). Measuring engagement at work: Validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, H. P., Pérez, V. C., Parra, P. P., Ortiz, M. L., Matus, B. O., McColl, C. P., ... Meyer, K. A. (2015). Academic achievement, engagement and burnout among firs year medical students. Revista Médica de Chile, 143(7), 930–937. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872015000700015Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante [Multivariate analysis]. Madrid, Spain: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hernández Vargas, C. I., Llorens Gumbau, S., Rodríguez Sánchez, A. M., & Dickinson-Bannack, M. E. (2016). Validación de la escala UWES–9 en profesionales de la salud en México [Validation of the UWES–9 Scale in Mexican Health Professionals]. Pensamiento Psicológico, 14(2), 89–100. http://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI14-2.veupCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria in fix indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
Lovakov, A. V., Agadullina, E. R., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Russian versión of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–9). Psychology in Russia State of the Art, 10(1), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrano, L. A., Moretti, L., & Ortiz, A. (2015). Medición del engagement académico en estudiantes universitarios [Measure of academic engagement in university students]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 2(40), 114–125.Google Scholar
Meng, L., & Jin, Y. (2017). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students in a Chinese sample. Nurse Education Today, 49, 129–134. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otero, J. M., Luengo, A., Romero, E., Gómez, J. A., & Castro, C. (1998). Psicología de la personalidad. Manual de prácticas [Personality psychology. Manual of practices]. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel Practicum.Google Scholar
Özdemir, A., Utkualp, N., & Palloş, A. (2016). Physical and psychological effects of the changes in adolescence period. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(2), 717–724.Google Scholar
Petrović, I. B., Vukelić, M., & Čizmić, S. (2017). Work engagement in Serbia: Psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, article 1799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portalanza Chavarria, C. A., Grueso Hinestroza, M. P., & Duque Oliva, E. J. (2017). Propiedades de la Utrecht Work Engagement Scale UWES–S–9: Análisis exploratorio con estudiantes en Ecuador [Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–S–9): Exploratory analysis of students in Ecuador]. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 27(64), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v27n64.62374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince-Embury, S., & Courville, T. (2008). Measurement invariance of the resiliency scales for children and adolescents with respect to sex and age cohorts. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573508316590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016, August). Construct validity of two student engagement scales: The UWES-S and the SEI. Paper presented at the 8 th Biennial Conference of EARLI SIG 1: Assessment & Evaluation. EARLI Congress. Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Rastogi, A., Prakash Pati, S., Kumar, P., Kumar Dixit, J., & Pradhan, S. (2017). Investigation of psychometric properties of UWES-S (student engagement) and its relationship with burnout and life satisfaction in the Indian context (Working Paper Number 222). Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode . Retrieved from: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:iik:wpaper:222Google Scholar
Remor, E. A., & Carrobles, J. A. (2001). Versión española de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (PSS–14): Estudio psicométrico en una muestra VIH+ [Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14): Psychometric study in a HIV+ sample]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 7(2–3), 195–201.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Montalbán, R., Sánchez-Cardona, I., & Martínez-Lugo, M. (2014). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Utrecht Work Engagement Scale en una muestra de trabajadores en Puerto Rico [Analysis of Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in a sample of workers in Puerto Rico]. Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.appuCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Römer, J. (2016). The Korean Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student (UWES-S): A factor validation study. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM23.1.5Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). UWES. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Marques-Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Vol. 5. Managing social and ethical issues in organizations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
Solberg Nes, L. (2016). Optimism, pessimism, and stress. In Fink, G (Ed.), Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior. Handbook of stress (pp. 405–411). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vallières, F., McAuliffe, E., Hyland, P., Galligan, M., & Ghee, A. (2017). Measuring work engagement among community health workers in Sierra Leone: Validating the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.12.001Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, A. C., Magnam, E. S., Pacico, J., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-USF, 20(2), 207–217. http://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202CrossRefGoogle Scholar