Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:20:04.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms of Contextual Control when Contexts are Informative to Solve the Task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Samuel P. León ,
A. Matías Gámez  and
Juan M. Rosas
Samuel P. León*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Jaén (Spain)
A. Matías Gámez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Jaén (Spain)
Juan M. Rosas
Affiliation:
Universidad de Jaén (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Samuel Parra León. Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n. 23071 Jaén (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted using a human instrumental learning task with the goal of evaluating the mechanisms underlying the deleterious effect of context-switching on responding to an unambiguous stimulus when contexts are informative to solve the task. Participants were trained in a context-based reversal discrimination in which two discriminative stimuli (X and Y) interchange their meaning across contexts A and B. In context A, discriminative stimulus Z consistently announced that the relationship between a specific instrumental response (R1) and a specific outcome (O1) was in effect. Performance in the presence of stimulus Z was equally deteriorated when the test was conducted outside the training context, regardless of whether the test context was familiar (context B) or new (context C). This result is consistent with the idea that participants code all the information presented in an informative context as context-specific with the context playing a role akin to an occasion setter.

Se realizó un experimento en condicionamiento instrumental humano con el objetivo de evaluar los mecanismos subyacentes al efecto de cambio de contexto sobre una clave de significado no ambiguo cuando los contextos son informativos para solucionar la tarea. Se entrenó a los participantes en una discriminación inversa basada en el contexto en la que debían discriminar entre dos claves (X e Y) que intercambiaban sus significados entre los contextos A y B. En el contexto A se presentó además el estímulo discriminativo Z anunciando consistentemente una relación entre una respuesta instrumental concreta (R1) y una consecuencia determinada (O1). La respuesta en presencia de la clave Z durante la prueba empeoró cuando la prueba se realizó fuera del contexto de entrenamiento, independientemente de si el contexto de prueba era un contexto familiar para el participante (contexto B) o un contexto nuevo (contexto C). Estos resultados son consistentes con la idea de que los participantes codifican toda la información presentada en contextos informativos como dependiente de contexto, con el contexto jugando un papel similar al de un estímulo modulador.

Keywords

attentioncontext-switch effectdiscriminationhuman beingsinstrumental learningatenciónefecto de cambio de contextodiscriminaciónseres humanosaprendizaje instrumental
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 10 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, M. J. F., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Rosas, J. M. (2009). Partial reinforcement and context switch effects in human predictive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 62, 174–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701855561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahlers, S. T., & Richardson, R. (1985). Administration of dexamethasone prior to training blocks ACTCH-induced recovery of an extinguished avoidance response. Behavioural Neuroscience, 99, 760–764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.99.4.760CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.3.219Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In Bouton, M. E. & Fanselow, M. S. (Eds.), Learning, motivation and cognition: The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles (pp. 385–409). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Hendrix, M. C. (2011). Intertrial interval as a contextual stimulus: Further analysis of a novel asymmetry in temporal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 79–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021214Google ScholarPubMed
Bouton, M. E., & Nelson, J. B. (1994). Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.1.51Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.12.4.333Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., Kenney, F. A., & Rosengard, C. (1990). State-dependent fear extinction with two benzodiazepine tranquilizers. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.104.1.44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., & Rosas, J. M. (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 482–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018527Google ScholarPubMed
Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Cubillas, C. P., & Rosas, J. M. (2011). Attentional instructions modulate differential context-switch effects after short and long training in human predictive learning. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.21.2.143Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, T. L. (1993). The nature and function of interoceptive signals to feed: Toward integration of physiological and learning perspectives. Psychological Review, 100, 640–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denniston, J. C., Chang, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Massive extinction treatment attenuates the renewal effect. Learning and Motivation, 34, 68–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0023-9690(02)00508-8Google Scholar
Eich, E. (2007). Context: Mood, memory, and the concept of context. In Roedigger, H. L. III, Dudai, Y., & Fitzpatrick, S. M. (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 107–110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fanselow, M. S. (2007). Context: What's so special about it?. In Roedigger, H. L. III, Dudai, Y., & Fitzpatrick, S. M. (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 101–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gámez, A. M., & Rosas, J. M. (2005). Transfer of stimulus control across instrumental responses is attenuated by extinction in human instrumental conditioning. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5, 265–308.Google Scholar
Gámez, A. M., & Rosas, J. M. (2007). Associations in human instrumental conditioning. Learning and Motivation. 38, 242–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Gutiérrez, A., & Rosas, J. M. (2003). Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 292–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.292Google ScholarPubMed
Gluck, M., & Myers, C. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450030410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, G., & Honey, R. C. (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.16.3.271Google ScholarPubMed
Holland, P.C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory, 28, 69–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60488-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattal, K. M. (2007). Effects of ethanol on the encoding, consolidation, and expression of extinction following contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 1280–1292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2008). Retrieval of simple cue-outcome relationships is context-specific within informative contexts. Escritos de Psicología, 2, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2010a). Giving contexts informative value makes information context specific. Experimental Psychology, 57, 46–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2010b). The effect of context change on simple acquisition disappears with increased training. Psicológica, 31, 49–63.Google Scholar
León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2011). Context-outcome associations mediate context-switch effects in a human predictive learning task. Learning and Motivation, 42, 84–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2010.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maes, J. H. R., Havermans, R. C., & Vossen, J. M. H. (2000). Factors affecting context specificity of appetitive conditioned responding. Behavioural Processes, 48, 149–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00076-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mensink, G. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Fernández, M. M., Abad, M. J. F., Ramos-Álvarez, M., & Rosas, J. M. (2011). Context-outcome associations underlie context-switch effects after partial reinforcement in human predictive learning. Psicológica, 32, 367–383.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.2001.1112Google Scholar
Nelson, J. B. (2009). Contextual control of first-and second-learned excitation and inhibition in equally ambiguous stimuli. Learning & Behavior, 37, 95–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, J. B., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). The effects of a context switch following serial and simultaneous feature-negative discriminations. Learning and Motivation, 28, 56–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1997.0946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes-Olay, C., & Rosas, J. M. (1999). Within-subjects extinction and renewal in Pavlovian learning. Psicológica, 20, 195–210.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning and Behavior. 30, 73–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192911CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2004). Signalling a change in cue-outcome relations in human predictive judgments. Learning & Behavior, 32, 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, G. C., Dickinson, A., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). Contextual conditional discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 38B, 217–237.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning, Vol.2. Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 341–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.23.3.283Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 461–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned after extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210600971519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, J. M., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Abad, M. J. F. (2006). Revision of retrieval Theory of Forgetting: What does make information context-specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147–166.Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicológica, 28, 129–150.Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., Vila, N. J., Lugo, M., & López, L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.153Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, B. L., Larsen, N., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00037-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar