Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:56:00.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male Youth Perceptions of Violent Extremism: towards a Test of Rational Choice Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2016

Mandeep K. Dhami  and
Jennifer Murray
Mandeep K. Dhami*
Affiliation:
Middlesex University (UK)
Jennifer Murray
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Napier University (UK)
*
*Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Mandeep K. Dhami, Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding how people perceive the pros and cons of risky behaviors such as terrorism or violent extremism represents a first step in developing research testing rational choice theory aiming to explain and predict peoples’ intentions to engage in, or support, these behaviors. Accordingly, the present study provides a qualitative, exploratory analysis of a sample of 57 male youths’ perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of: (a) accessing a violent extremist website, (b) joining a violent extremist group, and (c) leaving such a group. Youth perceived significantly more drawbacks than benefits of joining a violent extremist group (p = .001, d = .46) and accessing a violent extremist website (p = .001, d = .46). The perceived benefits of engagement referred to gaining knowledge/awareness, being part of a group/similar people, and fighting the enemy/for a cause. The drawbacks referred to being exposed to negative material and emotions, having violent/criminal beliefs and behaviors, and getting in trouble with the law. The perceived benefits of disengagement referred to no longer committing illegal acts, and regaining independence/not being manipulated. The drawbacks referred to exposing oneself to harm and reprisal. These findings provide an insight into how male youth think about (dis)engagement in violent extremism, and can inform future quantitative research designed to explain and predict (dis)engagement in violent extremism. Eventually, such research may inform the development of evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies.

Keywords

rational choicerisk perceptionterrorismviolent extremism
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E51
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, R. (2010). A general strain theory of terrorism. Theoretical Criminology, 14, 131–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480609350163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. (2006). Jihadi terrorists in Europe. The Hague, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. Retrieved from http://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/20061200_cscp_csp_bakker.pdf Google Scholar
Beyth-Marom, R., Austin, L., Fischhoff, B., Palmgren, C., & Jacobs-Quadrel, M. (1993). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 29, 549–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.3.549 Google Scholar
Bishop, B., Cooper, A., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). Innovative survey methodologies for the study of attitudes toward terrorism and counterterrorism strategies. Institute for Homeland Security Systems. Duke, NC: Duke University. Retrieved from http://sites.duke.edu/ihss/files/2011/12/Bishop_Cooper_Hillygus_SurveyMethodsLitReview.pdf Google Scholar
Bjørgo, T. (2011). Dreams and disillusionment: Engagement in and disengagement from militant extremist groups. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55, 277–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9282-9 Google Scholar
Borum, R. (2011). Understanding terrorist psychology . In Silke, A., (Ed.), The psychology of counter-terrorism (pp. 19–33). Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burroughs, J. E., Chaplin, L. N., Pandelaere, M., Norton, M. I., Ordabayeva, N., Gunz, A., & Dinauer, L. (2013). Using motivation theory to develop a transformative consumer research agenda for reducing materialism in society. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(1), 18–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.10.046 Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V., & Newman, G. R. (2009). Reducing the opportunities for terrorism: Applying the principles of situational crime prevention. In Stritzike, W., Lewandowsky, S., Denemark, D., Clare, J., & Morgan, F. (Eds.), Terrorism and torture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 86–105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, H. H. A. (1978). Psychopath as terrorist. Legal Medical Quarterly, 2, 253–262.Google Scholar
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amico, E. J., & Fromme, K. (2002). Brief prevention for adolescent risk-taking behavior. Addiction, 97, 563–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00115.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, J. C. (1973). Aggression, violence, revolution and war. In Knutson, J. N. (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 234–260). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dhami, M. K. (2014). A scientific approach to countering the terrorist threat. In Cole, J. & Pantucci, R. (Eds.), Community tensions (pp. 9–17). STFC/RUSI Conference Series No. 3. London, UK: RUSI and STFC.Google Scholar
Dhami, M. K., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Spanish young adults’ perceptions of the costs and benefits of risky driving. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 638–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38875 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2012a). Crime as risk taking. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18, 389–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.498423 Google Scholar
Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2012b). Forecasted risk taking in youth: Evidence for a bounded-rationality perspective. Synthese, 189, 161–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0110-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1%3C1::AID-BDM333%3E3.0.CO;2-S Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Lerner, J. S., & Small, D. A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 124–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124 Google Scholar
Garfinkel, R. (2007). Personal transformations: Moving from violence to peace. (Special Report 186). Washington, DC: United Estates Institute of Peace. Retrieved from http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr186.pdf Google Scholar
Gerstenfeld, P. B., Grant, D. R., & Chiang, C. P. (2003). Hate online: A content analysis of extremist interest sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x Google Scholar
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Sachdeva, S., & Medin, D. (2011). Psychology out of the laboratory: The challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist, 66, 507–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024715 Google Scholar
Glees, A., & Pope, C. (2005). When students turn to terror: How safe are British universities. London, UK: Social Affairs Unit.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (2001). Risky behavior among youths. An economic analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, S. E., Severson, H. H., Burns, W. J., Slovic, P., & Fisher, K. J. (2001). Risk perception, personality factors and alcohol use among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 167–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00025-8 Google Scholar
Hannah, G., Clutterbuck, L., & Ruben, J. (2008). Radicalization or rehabilitation: Understanding the challenge of extremist and radicalized prisoners. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Hegghammer, T. (2006). Terrorist recruitment and radicalization in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Policy, 13, 39–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2006.00269.x Google Scholar
Helmus, T. C., York, E., & Chalk, P. (2013). Promoting online voices for countering violent extremism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
HM Government (2010). Channel: Supporting individuals vulnerable to recruitment by violent extremists. London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
HM Government (2011). Prevent strategy. Cm 8092. London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2012). On the limits of rational choice theory. Economic Thought, 1(1), 94–108.Google Scholar
Home Office (2012). Operation of police powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and subsequent legislation: Arrests, outcomes and stops and searches. HOSB: 04/12. London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (2008). From profiles to pathways and roots to routes: Perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 618, 80–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716208317539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsee, C. K. (1999). Value seeking and prediction-decision inconsistency: Why don’t people take what they predict they’ll like most? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 555–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212963 Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Belanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachici, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163 Google Scholar
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychology and Aging, 6, 28–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.28 Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lum, C., Kennedy, L. W., & Shirley, A. (2006). Are counter-terrorism strategies effective? The results of the Campbell systematic review on counter-terrorism evaluation research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 489–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9020-y Google Scholar
Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 117–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.117 Google Scholar
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20, 425–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546550802073367 Google Scholar
Merari, A. (2010). Driven to death: Psychological and social aspects of suicide terrorism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monahan, J. (2012). The individual risk assessment of terrorism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 167–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025792 Google Scholar
Post, J. (1998). Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces. In Reich, W. (Ed.), Origins of terrorism. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre.Google Scholar
Pressman, E. (2009). Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism. User Report 2009–02. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2009-02-rdv/2009-02-rdv-eng.pdf Google Scholar
Victoroff, J. (2005). The mind of the terrorist: A review and critique of psychological approaches. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 3–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002704272040 Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed